• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the contribution of functionalist explanations towards an understanding of the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

JOHN SMYTH SOCIOLOGY ESSAY (1500 words) EXAMINE THE CONTRIBUTION OF FUNCTIONALIST EXPLANATIONS TO AN UNDERSTANDING OF THE FAMILY Functionalists believe that the family is a positive institution and view the ideal modern family as being the Nuclear Family. The nuclear family is described by Giddens (1989, p385) as a family 'which consists of two adults living together in a household with their own or adopted children'. Abercrombie et al (2006 p168) defines the nuclear family as 'Social units comprising a man and a woman living together with their children' Regardless of individuals definitions of what the nuclear family is, it is perceived as a family consisting of a father, mother and their children.The functionalist view (most popular in the 1960's) of the nuclear family comprises of a breadwinner husband and dependant wife and children - the 'cereal packet family' (Leach 1968) - this view of the family is also taken by sociologists like Murdock and Parsons. Functionalists take a consensus approach towards society and believe social institutions such as a family play an important part - i.e. the family makes a positive contribution towards society. Although Murdock and Parsons put across are similar themes - they believe that a nuclear family is best suited for a healthy society. Functionalists see the family as essential to the smooth running of society, therefore they emphasise the positive role of the family. Of all the views of the family the functionalists view is the most positive, whereas feminist and Marxist views and definition of the family are dissimilar ...read more.

Middle

He sees the family as having 9 functions - 3 essential and 6 non-essential. The 3 Essential functions were - Stable satisfaction of sexual needs, Production and rearing of children (the family structure provides a platform for the bearing and raising of children) and Provision of a home (provides physical shelter/serves as the main point of family existence). By regulation of sexual needs Fletcher is stating the family is a primary institution for the provision of love, care and emotional support for both adults/children and provides a sense of belonging and serves to clearly-define role relationships between men and women. The 6 non-essential functions were - Government (voting for government, strong views from senior family members) Economic (families working, paying taxes, consumption/shopping etc) Education, (encouraging family members to get educated, teaching right and wrong), Health, (both physical and mental)Religious (first exposure to religion and its ideas) and Recreation (meaning sport/games, fun activities). Fletcher sees these non-essential functions as providing a link with the wider social world. Young and Willmott are functionalists who after conducting studies suggested the family had gone through 4 stages of evolution. The Families at each stage were; The Pre-Industrial family, The Early Industrial Family, The Symmetrical Family and The Ay-Symmetrical family. In The Pre-Industrial family members worked together and unlike today home and work were not separated. This family ceased to exist as a result of the Industrial Revolution, but continued well into the nineteenth century. With The Early Industrial Family, men were drawn into industrial work as women did domestic duties. ...read more.

Conclusion

Murdock and Parsons have very good studies of the family from the 1950's and 60's. However the failure to point out negative aspects - the fact that families have minor conflicts and break ups and acknowledge other types of families and their contribution to society makes functionalist ideas one-sided. Critics claim they create a picture that is possibly too harmonious for a nuclear family whilst ignoring family diversity - e.g. cohabited couples or single parents. Family diversity is not mentioned by functionalists as they see the nuclear family as the only family that contributes to society. What has emerged over time helping to highlight family diversity is social change - rather than having one type of family we now find there are families and households from all different backgrounds - same sex marriages, lone parent families, mixed marriages (different race/religion/culture,etc). Households now vary considerably - today we have groups of singletons, student digs, households where extended family live (step brothers/sisters/parents etc) and normal rented households with people choosing to live with flat mates (people even move in with strangers) from completely different backgrounds. With more human and civil rights, people today have much more freedom to make their own decisions, whereas in years gone by people felt a considerable amount of (In some cultures enormous) pressure to conform to their particular religion/culture or that of their families. Although in some cultures (e.g., Indian families) the pressure of following tradition still exists, this new found freedom has contributed to help making diverse families more acceptable and the norm. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a star student thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Response to the question

This question has been answered well. The writer has a sound understanding of Functionalism, which is evident as the essay refers to many Functionalist sociologists (Parsons, Fletcher, Murdock). As well as using external criticisms from other groups within sociology such ...

Read full review

Response to the question

This question has been answered well. The writer has a sound understanding of Functionalism, which is evident as the essay refers to many Functionalist sociologists (Parsons, Fletcher, Murdock). As well as using external criticisms from other groups within sociology such as feminism, the writer provides internal criticisms. For example: “Whilst Fletcher (1966) agrees Murdock and Parsons that the nuclear family is the normal family, he disagrees with Parsons that the social functions in the family have decreased over time”. The fact that the writer reflects on differences within Functionalist sociology, really shows that they understand the main sociological theory that the question is addressing. The introduction and the conclusion are of very high standards – they are detailed, and not just the brief few lines that most candidates tend to write.

Level of analysis

The essay begins with: “Functionalists believe that the family is a positive institution and view the ideal modern family as being the Nuclear Family. The nuclear family is described by Giddens (1989, p385) as…” which wrongly seems to imply that Giddens is a Functionalist. He is in fact a late modernist. I feel that this would not diminish the overall grade awarded to this otherwise academically sound essay, but it’s just these little things that distinguish the top candidates from the rest. However I like the candidate’s use of dates as it shows how theories have changed and developed over time.
The writer explains sociological theory in detail, which shows the great extent of their knowledge. Marxism and feminism are also well explained as a Functionalist critique, which is impressive. Marxist and feminist key terms are used well in context, “capitalist” and “patriarchy”, as well as Functionalist key concepts such as “the stabilisation of adult personalities”. This clearly shows that they have a good knowledge of sociology as a whole.
The use of a bibliography suggests that the writer has thought very carefully about their essay, and has therefore documented where their evidence has come from for future reference (obviously in examination conditions this isn’t necessary). It shows the examiner that they have an awareness of other people’s work – they are not just copying or plagiarising. Instead they are using other people’s work, in their essay, to come to an informed conclusion.

Quality of writing

There are random uses of capital letters for certain words in this essay, “Socialisation” and “Nuclear” which is inaccurate. I think the writer just feels that these terms are crucially important to the essay, and so feels the need to differentiate them somehow. However this importance could be best portrayed by using quotation marks instead.
Murdock is spelled incorrectly as “Murdoch” and Willmott as “Millmott” which inclines me to think that the writer could and should have taken time to proof read their writing. On the whole though, spelling, punctuation and grammar are fair.


Did you find this review helpful? Join our team of reviewers and help other students learn

Reviewed by cwhite 12/09/2012

Read less
Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Examine the contribution of feminist perspectives to an understanding of the family.

    They claimed that 72% of the married men in their sample help their wife in some other way than washing, even though they do fail to specify what this help is. They believe that the family is symmetrical and both husband and wife have joint conjugal roles, which makes the family a functional institution.

  2. Assess the view that the symmetrical family exists in modern day society

    An argument that disagrees as well with the view that the symmetrical family exists in today's society is that joint incomes and pooling create inequality in families. The inequality between men in women is increased because of joint incomes as families do not share money or resources between each other.

  1. Decline of nuclear family

    to replace the old with a better, more desirable arrangement than try to repair it. Essentially divorce is a result of a more 'throwaway' attitude to marriage. Goode supports this idea by contending that as the moral significance of marriage declines so too does the value we place on our

  2. Assess the view that gender roles and relationships have become more equal in modern ...

    Radical feminists heplp to explain why most domestic violence is commited by men. They argue that violence against women is part of a patriarchal system that maintains men's power. They give a sociological explanation by linking patterns of domestic violence to dominant social norms about marriage.

  1. Examine the view that the nuclear family is universal. (24)

    If this argument is accepted, it is possible to see the matrifocal family as the basic, minimum family unit and other family structures as additions to this unit. This view is supported by Ynina Sheeran. She argues the female-carer core is the most basic family unit.

  2. Analyse how the family structure has changed over the last 100 years

    for reasons such as fear of divorce as the statistics show that you are more likely to get divorced if you marry at a young age. However, it could also just be general fear of divorce and the idea of having a series of long lasting relationships leading to cohabitation or marriage otherwise known as serial monogomy.

  1. Assess the view that marriage is no longer a popular institution in todays postmodernist ...

    Although divorce is the legal termination of a marriage, couples can do and find other solutions to the problem of an unhappy marriage such as an empty shell marriage, in which the couple continue to live under the same roof but remain married in name only.

  2. Sociology Family Revision Notes

    The decrease of the nuclear family due to the life cycle- many of the people who are not in a nuclear family right now are either divorced widows or young men. They have been a part of a nuclear family in the past or the future.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work