• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the effects of industrialization on the structure of the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Examine the effects of industrialization on the structure of the family Daisy Boois 12 lee Industrialisation came about around the late 18th century and early 19th century .industrialisation refers to the shift form an agricultural economy to one that is based on factory production. Industrialisation was considered as a factor that transformed British society in many respects. It is said to have had an effect on the family structure but many sociologist disagree to what degree it changed the family structure parsons (1955) claimed that industrialisation caused the transformation from extended family house holds to a nuclear family household. Whereas other sociologist like peter Laslett believe that the family has always been nuclear. So to what extent did the family structure change due to industrialisation? Parsons believed there were two types of society, industrial and pre-industrial society. He argued that these types of societies both had corresponding family structures that fitted there needs. He referred to this as a functional fit. He said there is a functional fit between pre-industrial societies and extended three or more generational family and a functional fit between industrial society and two generational nuclear family. Parsons argued that pre-industrial families were "units of economic production" work and home were not separated; family members worked together and lived together. ...read more.

Middle

Stage three was the modern industrial stage from about the 1900 from witch the symmetrical nuclear family started to emerge; as a result of social changed such as higher standards of living more married women getting paid work and the welfare state improved the living conditions Young and Wilmot's work show the importance of social class. Hardships encouraged some families to keep larger family units, because each member can help with child rearing, contributing to rent and food. Young and Willmott disprove parsons view on the family because it is considered as to generalised, where as there study shows a more in-depth study of the change of the family due to industrialisation. Michael Anderson used "exchange theory" to prove that the industrial 19th centaury kin preferred extended family network. Exchange theory involves the factors that motivate people to keep relationship with others depending on the cost and benefits. Andersons work showed because of industrialisation working class families formed extended families networks due to their hardship of the time, poor working condition in factories being dangerous and unhealthy pay. Extended families benefited its members because they could use older kin to take care of young while the parents went to work; also having other kin in the house hold brought extra money. Anderson also found that so son as conditions got better families started to cut ties with wider kin because they did not see the benefits. ...read more.

Conclusion

his sources because families could have had and extended network despite the fact that they did not life under the same roof. Due to the conditions families were exposed to sociologist like Young and Willmott and Anderson could be correct that the family might not have been extended but nuclear to begin with and changed because industrialisation especially in its early years that caused poverty. On the other hand the need for extended family in pre-industrial times could indicated that the family structure could have started out as extended because they lived as a economic unit of production, so the best way to keeping a farm especially a big farm having many people working on them, provided them with cheep labour and a way to survive. in addition statements that the family structure had always been nuclear cant be completely correct because industrialisation with a bit from help urbanisation did change the family structure. I would have to agree with parsons and young and Willmott that both there studies could be correct to a to some extent but also conclude that the effect of industrialisation to the family was that the family structure were not only extended in pre-industrialisation but also in early industrialisation because in both times a wider kinship seemed necessary and then after that in modern society they changed into nuclear isolated family units. ?? ?? ?? ?? Daisy Boois ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Sociology The Family

    different parts of family, for example housework to examine issues women have within the family as a social institution.

  2. Examine the relationship between Industrialisation and the changes in the family

    The only problem with Michael Anderson's analysis is that he only looked at 10% of the census and Preston may not have been the best place to take a sample from to analyse. Peter Laslett (1965) believed that the extended family did not exist as a dominant family in pre-industrial Britain.

  1. Explain the relationship between family structure and industrialisation

    Britain the family was actually an isolated nuclear family, this was because people had such short lives that they often married and had children late in life meaning that they would never live to be grandparents. Laslett then discovered that it was when urbanisation occurred as a result of industrialisation,

  2. Analyse how the family structure has changed over the last 100 years

    Singletons could be a result of the impact of feminism however so could single parent families as women are frequently told that they dont need men and therefore choose to bring up their children fatherless or with hardly any imput from the male side.

  1. Is the nuclear family in decline?

    A kind of family in crises seems to be put forward by politicians, sociologist and even journalist. The preferred assumption was that the family was in decline and that this decline has a negative effect in the society. According to M.Phillips,2006 ?The causes of crime is in the widespread and

  2. Families and Households. Notes on Diversity Childhood and Industrialisation.

    The state encourages women to stay at home and look after the family by distributing carers allowance to those who do this they use women as a ?reserve army of labour?. Equal Pay act ? ensures women have equal pay as men ? new right argue policies like these take

  1. Sociology and the Family

    Marxist Friedrich Engels (1984) suggested that the monogamous nuclear family developed to resolve inheritance problems. Male offspring were shaped to be suitable heirs for the family assets. Thus, the nuclear family was designed to control women and protect property, conserving patriarchalism . The ?cereal packet? nuclear family is typically portrayed by the media as idealistic.

  2. Sociology Research Paper - To examine how teenage pregnancy affects the teen mothers health ...

    According to www.healthcommunities.com there are health risk in teenage pregnancy such as Teenage mothers are less likely to gain adequate weight during their pregnancy, leading to low birthweight. Low birthweight is associated with several infant and childhood disorders and a higher rate of infant mortality.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work