• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the Marxists view of the family

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐Examine the Marxist view of the family Marxists believe that the nuclear family is dominant in capitalist?s society. They see the family as performing essential functions, but negative functions. These functions benefit the minority in power (bourgeoisie) and the economy. The functions disadvantage the working class society (proletant). Marxists believe that the family is a unit of consumption. Family members go out to work to earn money. With their wages/salary they purchase goods such as food, clothing and electrical goods, from capitalist manufacturers. The bourgeoisie make a profit from this. Zaretsky (1976) backed this theory up by saying that when a man returns home form work he is the ?king of his castle?. This helps him to accept his low work status by allowing him to believe he has a high status at home. However, whilst men think that they are the ruler of the home, Morgan (1996) argues that the source of power with in the family is food. ...read more.


From being a child, they will grow up and mature and become aunties/uncles, parents and grandparents themselves. The children will also grow up to look after their parents when they become too old and incapable of doing things. In contrast to Marxists, functionalists believe that society is held together by shared culture and the institutions. They believe rules in society exist to benefit both individuals and society. Murdock was a functionalist theorist that carried out a study of 250 societies. From this he identified 4 common functions of the nuclear family. These include: sexual; reproductive; economic and educational. The reproductive and sexual sector of the family provides and controls sexual relationships of its adult members. By doing this, they create a new member of society. When the child is born, families teach the child norms and values of society, therefore maintaining the value of consensus. This is what functionalist see as the educational side of the family. Parsons (1902-79) introduced the theory that there are two basic irreducible functions of the family. ...read more.


Functionalists have also been accused of ignoring growing family diversity, because they believe that the nuclear family is the one that is best suited to the wider needs of society. They completely ignore all other family types such as extended, reconstituted and single parent. Be that as it may, every family may have their ?dark side?. All types of families can consist of emotional blackmail and verbal/sexual abuse. To conclude, I think both Marxists and Functionalist both have made some fair points with their theories. I think that Marxists have an acceptable point when they say that the family socialise children to accept capitalism and levels of hierarchy. I also agree with Berger and Kellner?s theory of ?on-going construction? throughout the family. With Functionalists, I agree with Parsons theory of the two basic irreducible functions of the family and to some degree I do agree with Murdock?s theory of socialisation. However, I do despise how Functionalists completely ignore the negative side to families and I think that this is a factor they should consider before they automatically assume that every nuclear family is rosy. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically examine the Functionalist idea that the nuclear family exists for the benefit of ...

    5 star(s)

    This inequality is supported by the use or the threat of male violence against women and the nuclear unit reproduces this patriarchal ideology that is not for the benefit of all of society, especially not women. Additionally, Feminists argue that primary socialization of children ensures the inheritance of male dominance and female submission is reproduced generation after generation.

  2. How cultural deprivation affects the educational attainment of students.

    The data will therefore be quantitative. Information such as opinions and perspectives will not be included. This is because it would be harder to analyse and is time consuming. Closed questions are more suited to my study than open questions. This is because the data will be measurable and a wider range of topics can be covered in the questionnaire.

  1. Is the nuclear family in decline?

    a real choice for way of living, and this gittins sees as improving awareness that the nuclear family might not live up to reality (general one file).Fuelled by the media moral panics about rising crimes, low standard of education, the young lacking work ethnics and the rise of illegitimacy.

  2. Sociology Research Paper - To examine how teenage pregnancy affects the teen mothers health ...

    Thus, consensus is apparently achieved through the structuring of human behavior. Within medical sociology, this approach is essentially concerned with the theme of the 'sick role', and the associated issue of illness behavior. Talcott Parsons, the leading figure within this sociological tradition, identified illness as a social phenomenon rather than as a purely physical condition.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work