• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the role of access to opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance (12 marks)

Extracts from this document...


Examine the role of access to opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance (12 marks) Opportunity structures can be described as a factor, situation or pathway which can lead towards or away from deviant or criminal behaviour, for example if someone does not gain access to the legitimate opportunity structure of education to achieve goals they may look to other, illegitimate opportunities and which can lead to them committing crime or engaging in deviant behaviour. One theory that supports the role of access to opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance is, arguing that unequal access to legitimate opportunity structures is the cause of this behaviour is Merton's Strain Theory. Merton's 'Strain theory and anomie' argues that deviance arises from the structure of society. He has developed the functionalist theory of deviance to attempt to explain why deviance occurs in the first place. He argues that people engage in deviant behaviour because they are unable to achieve socially approved goals by legitimate means. Most people share goals - for example, financial success, having their own home and possessing consumer goods - and most conform to the approved means of achieving them, like working in paid employment. However, in an unequal society, Merton argues that not all individuals have the same opportunity of realising these goals by approved means. ...read more.


However, Merton's strain theory can be criticised because it focuses on individual responses to limited access to opportunity structures or access to illegitimate opportunity structures and doesn't recognise that there is a social pattern of crime and deviance affecting whole groups of people, linked to social class, age, gender, ethnicity and locality, and not all of these people are subjected to the same opportunity structures. Strain theory also fails to explain why some people who are exposed to illegitimate opportunity structures do not take advantage of them and turn towards crime and deviant behaviour, or why people who have access to positive opportunity structures within a society and appear to be apparently conforming people in society can actually be 'innovators' in illegal activities, such as white-collar and corporate crime. Subcultural theories, such as the status frustration theory proposed by Cohen (1971) focus on the position of groups and their opportunity structures rather than just on individuals, and how these groups adapt in different ways to the strain facing them in achieving social goals. Cohen argues that working-class youth believe in the success goals of mainstream culture, but their experiences of failure in education, living in deprived areas and having the worst chances in the job market all mean they have little access to legitimate opportunity structures to attain these goals by approved means. ...read more.


Conflict subcultures are characterised by violence, gang warfare, 'mugging' and other street crime. Both approved and illegal means of achieving mainstream goals are blocked or limited and young people express their frustration at this situation through violence or street crime, and at least obtain status through success in subcultural peer-group values, such as those that Cohen's status frustration theory recognises. 3. Retreatist subcultures emerge among those lower-class youth who are 'double failures' = they have failed to succeed both through the mainstream legitimate opportunity structures and in the crime and gang illegitimate opportunity structures. The response is a retreat into drug addiction and alcoholism, paid for by petty theft, shoplifting and prostitution. This theory therefore shows how even in illegitimate opportunity structures, unequal opportunities arise which causes the 3 different types of subcultures. These theories all provide evidence for the role of opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance, being the unequal access to legitimate structures and the access of illegitimate structures leading towards criminal and deviant behaviour. However, it can be argued that access to opportunity structures do not fully explain causes for all deviant behaviours and cannot be seen to play the full role in deviant and criminal behaviour. These theories do not provide reasoning for individuals who are exposed only to legitimate opportunity structures yet still engage in deviant and criminal behaviour. Therefore, there must be other factors also contributing to the role of these behaviours, but the role of opportunity structures can be seen to contribute largely to causing criminal and deviant behaviour. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    crime and result in different systems of justice for disadvantaged and privileged groups. Not without its weaknesses, however, critics point out that laws protect most people, not just the affluent, as conflict theorists argue. In addition, although conflict theory offers a powerful analysis of the origins of crime, it is less effective in explaining other forms of deviance.

  2. Evaluate Functionalist Theories of Crime and Deviance

    However, "Strain Theory" can be criticized, namely by Interactionists who would challenge his claim of everyone sharing similar ends. They would instead point to the differences in objectives between different societies, as well as clear anomalies (as seen in Merton's theoretical views)

  1. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Instead they develop an alternative distinctive set of values- a delinquent subculture. They replace accepted means of behavior, for instance stealing cars becomes hard work, and instead stride to achieve status and respect from peers that they are denied in wider society.

  2. The Sociology of Crime and Deviance

    The term Anomie derived from Durkheim, to Merton means: a discontinuity between cultural goals and the legitimate means available for reaching them. However, there is less empahsis on the legality of reaching goals as this theory looks at what happens if goals cannot be reached.

  1. subcultural theory

    This tendency exerts pressure for deviance, a pressure that varies depending on a person's position in the social structure. For example, there is more pressure for deviance for someone lower down in the social structure because they have little means of achieving their goals.

  2. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    In 1957, Merton developed the concept of the 'American Dream', where the society had culturally defined goals, achievable due to the well established institution. But this resulted in several key theories for deviance: INNOVATION - The American Dream strongly encourages all to succeed, although the opportunity for success is unevenly distributed, partly due to variant levels of resources and technology.

  1. Assess the view that cults and sects are fringe organisations that are inevitably short ...

    However, this did not destroy the sect, and on the contrary, it actually grew under the new leadership of ?Aleph?, and the movement continued to recruit members. This casts doubt on the claim that sects are short lived movements, or if certain sects manage to continue on due to the dedication of the members.

  2. Examine the role of access to opportunity structures in causing crime and deviance

    education and careers. Merton argues that an individual's position in the social structure affects the way they adapt or respond to the strain to anomie, and there are five different types of adaptation depending on the individual's response to situations.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work