• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the view that the nuclear family did not exist in the U.K before industrialisation (20 marks)

Extracts from this document...


Examine the view that the nuclear family did not exist in the U.K before industrialisation (20 marks) The pre-industrial society was based largely upon extended kinship networks where labour was shared communally. Each family would produce and manufacture goods, which were then sold to other family groups. Extended family was the norm with very few people leaving the family home. Talcott Parsons, a functionalist, argued that the nuclear family did not exist before industrialisation and was a product of it. He argued that industrialisation brought about four major changes to the system of the family, thereby making the shift from extended family to privatised nuclear family. Due to industrialisation, the economy demanded a workforce that was more geographically mobile. According to Parsons view the nuclear family was formed as many people moved away from extended kin in order to take advantage of the job opportunities that were available. ...read more.


The male takes on an instrumental role as the bread winner. It is seen as the males job to go out to work and earn money for his family. The female, on the other hand, takes on an expressive role as carer and nurturer of the family. Parsons, along with other functionalists, favoured these family roles as they provide children with both male and female role models to look up to. Parsons concluded that industrialisation brought about the nuclear family which did not exist before then. The nuclear family is seen as best fit as it benefits the industrial society better than the extended family. Some social historians, such as Peter Laslett, disregarded Parsons claim and stated that the nuclear family existed before industrialisation and was not a product of it. Laslett studied the Parish registers, which suggested that only 10% of families, before industrialisation, were extended. ...read more.


Pre-Industrial Family was typically seen as extended family. Links to wider kin helps produce an economic unit where goods were produced. The farther was seen as the head of the household, exercising economic control over his family. Asymmetrical Family was then brought about. The family home and work place became separated. Many males went off to work while females carried out domestic responsibilities. Symmetrical Family was brought about in the twentieth century. This family was quite different from the first two in many respects. Symmetric families are more child-centred and involve greater equality between males and females based upon joint conjugal roles. In conclusion, there is much evidence to suggest that the nuclear family was brought about due to industrialisation. As Parsons suggested, extended family shifted towards nuclear family as the industrial society demanded a workforce which could only be obtained through the nuclear family. There is also evidence to suggest that industrialisation did not completely wipe out the extended family as it still exists in many societies. ?? ?? ?? ?? Shareen Akhtar ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically examine the Functionalist idea that the nuclear family exists for the benefit of ...

    5 star(s)

    They argue that the nuclear family is the main reason for the patriarchal ideology is transmitted through the process of socialisation to children. This, in turn, encourages the notion that the sexual division of labour is natural and for the benefit of all society.

  2. Examine the view that the nuclear family is universal. (24)

    Another type of household that may contradict Murdock's claims about the universality of the family as defined by him is the gay or lesbian household. By definition, such households will not contain adults of both sexes; at least two of whom maintain a 'socially approved sexual relationship' (Murdock 1949).

  1. Assess the view that Industrialisation led to the decline of the extended family and ...

    Parsons agreed that Industrialisation did lead to the decline of extended families and the rise of nuclear families. He suggested that before Industrialisation families were large and extended and that Industrialisation created the isolated nuclear family.

  2. Sociology The Family

    needs of society have brought changes which have influenced how the family as a social institution now works. For example the early capitalist textile production of cloth took place in the home and involved all family members. (Harolambos and Holborn 2004:471).

  1. Discuss the view that the modern family is becoming more diverse

    as cited in Fulcher, J. and Scott, J., 2003. Sociology. 2nd Edition. United States: Oxford University Press Inc. Dennis, N. and Erdos, G. (1992), Families Without Fatherhood (London: Institute of Economic Affairs) as cited in Fulcher, J. and Scott, J., 2003. Sociology. 2nd Edition. United States: Oxford University Press Inc.

  2. Is the nuclear family in decline?

    Jeffrey Weeks and Catherine Donovan (1999) did observe in their studies that during the past generation the possibilities of living together in an open lesbian or gay life have being transformed. Moreover the new reproductive technologies have affected the way traditional families are seen. The first ?test tube baby? was born in 1978 through a process

  1. Families and Households. Notes on Diversity Childhood and Industrialisation.

    Charles Murray ? Argues that welfare benefits too high, resulting in a ?culture of dependency? because of this individuals find it acceptable to take benefits rather than work. Fletcher ? Criticises structural differentiation as he argues that the family has retained its functions which have become increased in detail and

  2. Sociology and the Family

    Marxist Friedrich Engels (1984) suggested that the monogamous nuclear family developed to resolve inheritance problems. Male offspring were shaped to be suitable heirs for the family assets. Thus, the nuclear family was designed to control women and protect property, conserving patriarchalism . The ?cereal packet? nuclear family is typically portrayed by the media as idealistic.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work