• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the ways in which educational policies may reproduce and justify social class inequalities

Extracts from this document...


Examine the ways in which educational policies may reproduce and justify social class inequalities The Macro, Structuralist theory of education is said to be meritocratic from a functionalist perspective, creating equality of opportunity for all. The Marxist perspective challenges this and sees education as part of societies ideological state (Althuser 1972), controlled by policies. These policies have, in effect contradicted the theory of equality of opportunity. Over the past several years sociologists have investigated how social class affects people's success and opportunities throughout education. Their finding clearly show students are treated differently dependant upon their class. The higher your class the more success you will have. When looking at social inequalities the first areas to consider are the processes within the school itself, in particular the labelling imposed upon students primarily by teachers. Ball (1981) studied labelling within schools and found that teachers have different expectations from students of different classes; in particular they had higher expectations of middle class students and looked more favourably upon them. This was further supported by Keddie (1971) and Becker (1971). They proposed that negative labelling of students can lead to a self fulfilling prophecy of failure. Teachers evaluate pupils in terms of an ideal student by looking at appearance, personality, speech and social class. ...read more.


Pupils who passed their 11+ and went to grammar school were automatically seen as being upper class, regardless of their mental and academic capabilities. Children who failed their 11+ had to attend one of the other two schools and they were seen as failures because they failed their exam. This links back to the negative labelling theory and directly implicates the Education Act as the culprit for social inequalities and also psychological harm to children labelled as a failure. In addition to the in school factors it is worthwhile considering out of school factors. The main factor would be material deprivation. Halsey (1980) found that the most important factor preventing working class students staying on at school was lack of financial support. Once children reach the age of 15 they are able to leave school and it is no surprise that many working class children do leave school as they do not have the money to continue. This is clearly a result of a rigid Marxist society. Society makes it easy for people to leave school if they have no money so they can enter the workforce as obedient, docile workers, leaving room for the rich and middle classes to fill the high powered positions within society, fitting the ideological state theory. ...read more.


Their efforts are fair and somewhat admirable but they still reproduce inequalities. Money and ambition play the largest role in whether students can continue their education once thy reach 15. Government funding and EMA have recently been introduced but for some it is still not enough money to support themselves therefore the idea of entering the workforce is more appealing. It is comforting that the government takes education so seriously but what they are indirectly doing is removing the people from lower class backgrounds from education as quickly as possible and leaving middle class "respectable" citizens in education so that they can enter the workforce and fill the high powered, top positions. Hyman (1967) suggested that the values of the working class are a self imposed barrier to improving their position. He said that the working class tend to place a low value on education. Whereas Sugarman (1970) said that pupils from non manual backgrounds and manual backgrounds have different outlooks on life. Manual background pupils lived for immediate gratification and pupils from non manual backgrounds were ambitious and deferred their gratification by spending time studying and planning for the future. Is this true or is it simply due to the fact that we live in a Marxist society where the government imposes strict educational policies to push out the working class and concentrate on their precious ideology of a society ruled by middle class, rich powerful citizens. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Examine the Marxist view that the role of the education system is to reproduce ...

    It also ensured schools that students had an acceptance of hierarchy. Hierarchy is where you always have a person above you telling you what to do.

  2. Examining equality in Education.

    He says that restricted code is a kind of shorthand speech that is characterised by being short, grammatically simple and often with unfinished sentences. People who have shared the same experience may often use restricted code as long explanations are not always necessary but an outsider or someone who has not shared the experience may not fully understand.

  1. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    This according to them is the fragmentation of most work is mirrored in the "breaking up of the curriculum" into subjects and topics. The lack of control over work for the individual is reflected in the powerlessness of pupils over what they learn and how.

  2. 'The function of education is to reproduce and legitimate social inequality. Discuss.'

    In any industrial capitalist society there is a rigid hierarchy of authority, this is evident in the workplace, in society and in its values which are instilled in members of society at any early age - at school. For example in the workplace; Shareholders, Directors, Managers, professionals, technical staff, white

  1. Outline some of the ways in which some marketisation and selection policies may produce ...

    allowing the school to cream-skim the very best pupils making the school more popular because it has a better rank in the exam league tables.

  2. 'Education is a tool of the ruling class'- Discuss.

    It transmits common values (generation by generation) that is crucial to the maintenance of social order in society. Parsons in particular argued the point that school was a bridge that acted between the family and the wider society. Its role was to promote universal values i.e.

  1. What are the strengths and weakness of the conflict perspective in Sociology? Illustrate how ...

    Durkheim states 'education perpetuates and reinforces the homogenieity by fixing in the child from the beginning the essential similarities which collective life demand'. Durheim emphasisizes that in order for society to function, there must be social cohesion and this is achieved through education.

  2. Gender and Educational Attainment

    This is because evidence shows that teachers and all members of staff are not as strict with boys as they are with girls. Teachers are more likely to extent deadlines for work, to have lower expectations of boys, to be more tolerant of disruptive, unruly behavior from boys in the classroom and to accept poorly presented work.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work