• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examine the weakness of different types of documents used in a sociological research. Examine why positivist prefer quantitative data whilst interpretivists prefer qualitative data.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

1a. Examine the weakness of different types of documents used in a sociological research. (20 marks) Documents are secondary data developed by individuals, groups, and organisations, in which sociologist may find particularly advantageous in their research. Taking that into account, there are two types of documents both personal and public. Public documents are items such as letters, diaries, autobiographies, notes and photo collections. Personal documents may be noted as unrepresentative, because some groups are unlikely to produce personal documents such as diaries and letters, because they have got limited leisure. Therefore, their views may not be represented, whilst those with the time and literacy skills may be overrepresented. When it comes to examining the personal documents, it somehow lacks the authenticity. There may be possibly missing pages, or someone must have reproduced another copy, making it seem fake. For example, there was claim that Hitler diaries were fakes. Personal documents may also potentially lack the credibility. ...read more.

Middle

The researcher may need specialist skills to comprehend the document. It may have to be translated from a foreign language, but the meaning of words may change. Historical documents unrepresentative, because some documents can get lost or destroyed, giving an incomplete and unrepresentative picture of the past. Alternatively, public documents can be easily accessible, because someone else has already gathered the information. The existing document saves the sociologist time and money. Furthermore, positivist tend to reject do document because they lack representativeness, reliability, and generalisability. They are often unreliable. They are often unreliable and unstandardised. For example, a person diary is different so it makes it hard to generalise from. They can be unrepresentative, because a minority of people write diaries and letters. Interpreting documents is challenging, because researchers use their own meaning. 1b. Examine why positivist prefer quantitative data whilst interpretivists prefer qualitative data (20 marks) Sociologist choice of research method is influenced by their methodological perspective, which is their perspective of what society is like and how we should examine it. ...read more.

Conclusion

This may not be necessarily true, because the interpretivist decisively argued that social actor's behaviour is predominantly based on meanings they give to a situation, not the they influence of external or social forces. Positivist purposely used quantitative data to discover and measure the causes of these behaviour patterns. When examining the data, sociologist can discover the scientific laws of cause and effect that determine social actor's behaviour. Whereas, the interpretivist uses qualitative data to discover and describe the meanings held by social actors. When interpreting the qualitative data, interpretivsit can uncover the subjective meaning of social actor's behaviour. Furthermore, when a sociologist chooses which methodology to use, there are practical and ethnical limitations. Questionnaire data have problems to do with sampling frames, the geographical distribution of sample, question design, planning time. On the other hand, there are practical problems concerning gaining trust, access etc. However, sociologists do not need to make a choice between quantitative and qualitative research methods. They could the triangulation process by combining two of the different research methods to complement one another- with the strength of one balancing out the weakness of the other. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a good answer showing a strong understanding of the methodological issues in both question one and two. The candidate should try to use more named examples to give evidence when making a point. In question two the candidate could link to perspectives such as Feminism, Marxism or Functionalism to advance their marks further.

Marked by teacher Lesley Clark 27/02/2012

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Free essay

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society

    3 star(s)

    be traced back to Emile Durkheim, a French sociologist and pioneer in the development of modern sociology and anthropology. In 1895, Durkheim wrote "The Rules of Sociological Method". In this, Durkheim stressed that sociology as a science would be characterized not by abstract theory, but rather by observation.

  2. "Compare and contrast modernisation theory and dependency theory as explanations of development and under-development"

    He also makes a contrast with undeveloped and under-developed countries, undeveloped countries have no manufacturing sector and also no interface to change this whereas under-developed countries have some manufacturing as a result of an external interface yet are poor. Underdevelopment is the process where the economy of a third world country is distorted by the TNCs of a western nation.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of interviews, as a research method

    Unstructured interviews also have ethical issues. The ethical advantages are that unstructured interviews are particularly useful when researching sensitive topics. This will help the interviewee to feel comfortable discussing difficult or personal subjects, such as abuse, as there are no set answers and discussing topics in an informal manor forms more of a relationship between the interviewer and interviewee.

  2. Can and should sociology be a science?

    This involves the process of falsification by following a particular set of methodological procedures. In order for sociology to be a science, Popper proposed that it should be based on the hypothetico-deductive method. He believed that the longer a theory has yet to be falsified, the closer it is likely

  1. Outline and evaluate the interactionist view of education (40 marks)

    Once separated, behaviour began to diverge and lower set pupils became lazy because they felt that they could not achieve as highly as the top set classes. Similarly, Keddie found that pupils in the top sets would be taught abstract knowledge and pupils in the lower sets were taught concrete knowledge disabling them from competing with pupils in higher sets.

  2. Is sociology a science?

    Thus scientists interpreted findings in terms of these belief systems rather than with reference to the qualities inherent in the object of study. In addition, feminists would also argue sociology is not scientific as sociology must produce interpretative understandings using in-depth methods and therefore positivist methods are inappropriate.

  1. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of questionnaires, as a research method

    The researcher should also tell the participants all the relevant aspects of the research so that they can make a fully informed decision. Also, if a participant is under the age of 18, the researcher needs to get parental consent before they can take part in the research.

  2. Compare and contrast two sociological theories

    The word conflict describes those perspectives which assume that, in society, groups exist with differing interests. Even though these two theories oppose, they do have some similarities. They both offer a macro-explanation of society meaning they both look at the overall structure of society, rather than looking at individual views.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work