• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Examining equality in Education.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Education A major issue within the sociology of education is that of equality, particularly why working class families generally attain less educationally than their middle class peers. The British government has been trying to make the education system of this country a meritocracy since around the start of industrialisation. However, research shows that each new policy introduced has failed families of the lower classes in some way. My aim in this essay is to discuss what extent the education system of this country is a meritocracy. The way I have decided to structure this essay is firstly to look at the history of education in Britain, then to examine attempts to make educational attainment equally achievable for each and every individual, regardless of gender, race or class. I will then look at some of the problems faced by families of the lower classes and also give some possible reasons for the failure of each new policy and finally to conclude with some criticisms aimed at the education system as a whole. In 1870, the Forster Education Act made the state responsible for elementary education and in 1880 schooling became compulsory for all children up to the age of 10. Prior to this, the only type of education available was private and so came at a cost. This was usually only affordable by the upper and middle classes. There were many factors contributing to the introduction of compulsory education, one of which being with industrialisation sweeping through Britain at this time, more and more parents were finding themselves in paid employment in factories and workshops away from the home. This meant that safe, suitable establishments were necessary to care for the children of working class families. Other factors included the development of our armies and providing educated young men to defend our country as well as developing a skilled workforce for the new industrialised Britain that was emerging, and developing educated young women to make better wives and mothers, to name but a few. ...read more.

Middle

What followed was the 'Comprehensive System' and those who favoured this system did so because they believed the damaging, unfair stigma of the 'eleven plus failure' would be removed. It was thought that by enabling children of different social backgrounds to mix with each other that a cultural 'rub-off' effect would occur and that it would be of particular benefit to the working classes. However, with this system, the schools and the class sizes were too large and impersonal and more children were held back as the teachers had more children to focus upon. The system has also been criticised for not breaking down the class barriers. Children of working class backgrounds tend to mix with other children of working class backgrounds in the lower academic groupings, whilst children of the middle classes, in the higher academic groupings, tend to mix with other middle class children. Also, the aim of the Comprehensive System was to improve academic results but the results are fundamentally unchanged. Instead they reappear in new guises as the educational environment changes. The final and most recent attempt at providing equality within the British education system came with the 1988 Education Reform Act. This saw the introduction of various new schemes nationwide. In particular, the Government laid down, for the first time, a 'National Curriculum' that required both boys and girls to study both sciences and languages. Previous to this, boys would tend to study sciences and girls would tend to study languages. This act also introduced a new qualification known as the 'General Certificate of Secondary Education' or 'GCSE', which replaced the previous two tier system of 'O' Levels for the more academic pupils and CSE's for those judged less able; it meant that all students would now be entered for the same exams. The National Curriculum also meant that all subjects, nationwide, would contain the same core content and students would be taught the same regardless off the school they went to or where they lived. ...read more.

Conclusion

Then, in 1975, the Sex Discrimination Act prohibited sex discrimination in admission to schools, appointing teachers and in giving careers advice. It also specified that neither boys nor girls should be refused access to courses or benefits based solely on their sex. Since this act, the achievements at both 'O' Level and 'A' Level have been reversed, however, males still achieve more at university. Until 1997, the majority of university students were male with 80% of university professors being male. It has been suggested that that there is a difference in innate ability between boys and girls. However, while researchers have looked for evidence suggesting girls have lower levels of ability than boys, they have found that if anything, it's the boys with the lower innate ability. Although, this could be because girls generally mature quicker than boys but by the age of 16, the boys have again overtaken the girls. Therefore, it seems apparent that of previous years, girls have been held back during the earlier years of education. In conclusion, it seems as though some sociologists claim that inequality within education has a biological rather than a cultural basis which returns us to the nature/nurture debate. Within the education system today, all students have access to the same educational provisions regardless of social backgrounds but only if everyone has equal opportunity to succeed can the system be seen as a meritocracy. The sheer existence of a private, independent education sector to which access is restricted according to income and social background is clearly not meritocratic. Also, labelling and typing, which is done on the basis of social class and/or race, is strongly linked to educational achievement. Essentially, today in Britain, the education system is a meritocracy although not completely and it hasn't always been. It still fails some families but the number of pupils leaving school without any qualifications has fallen considerably suggesting more have been able to develop. More students are now taking 'A' Levels and the proportion of students in higher education has risen from about 10% in the 1960's to around 40% in the 1990's. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. 'The function of education is to reproduce and legitimate social inequality. Discuss.'

    Qualifications do not necessarily make you more proficient in those jobs. The schools select who is a success and who is a failure but they may often misplace them in the social structure by not allowing for labelling, social class backgrounds or sex differences.

  2. Examine sociological explanations of the relationship between education and the economy

    The lads chose to and accepted themselves as failures and didn't see the point in trying so just gave up. It was not passive as Marxists first thought. Even this type of attitude created the right workforce, they were uncritical and just got on with it.

  1. Assess the claim that the nuclear family as a dominant form of family structure ...

    He also suggests that female attitudes to sexuality are responsible as fidelity is less important because of women's movement and contraception. With evidence as strong as this, it is difficult to argue against the claim that the nuclear family has been replaced by a variety of family types.

  2. Sociological explanations of under achievement.

    be proposed that Marxists are more likely to blame society however functionalists and interactionists are not, as a result of the discussion it could be argued that the theories are significantly different. Our next focus is on feminists, feminism is a social movement which makes women aware of the disadvantages

  1. Free essay

    Access sociological explanations of the patterns of women's physical illness and access to healthcare.

    Women also visit the doctors more because of their role as a primary carer. They often take other relatives to the doctors and end up talking about their problems themselves. In this way, they access more health care. But these statistics aren't always to be trusted because they don't show everything in contrast.

  2. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    In other ways the same barriers that were in place in the tripartite system still stand. The schools perform differently depending where they are, who goes there and how good the teachers are. The students from the working class are still underachieving compared to the middle class pupils.

  1. Assess The View That Material Deprivation Is The Most Important Barrier To Educational Attainment.

    The theory of cultural deprivation is that working class groups deprived of certain important factors before school accounts for low educational attainment or underachievement at school. Equality of opportunity can then only become a reality by compensating for the deprivations through education.

  2. What is education for? Critically evaluate the diverse functions of education with reference to ...

    (Finch p,16) This is an issue that still prevails nearly sixty years later. It must be stressed that there were other issues of inequality besides class which will be discussed in the next section of this essay, in relation to the different kinds of education children could expect to receive.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work