• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Explain and analyse the Reasons for Punishment.

Extracts from this document...


Religious Studies Assignment 6 by Marc Piano Explain and analyse the Reasons for Punishment A Categorical Imperative (4) B Natural Moral Law (4) C Intuitionism (4) Punishment, in the context of law, is "a penalty inflicted by a court of justice on a convicted offender as a just retribution, and incidentally for the purposes of reformation and prevention". In this definition, three possible understandings of punishment are stated, but there are several more. Some of the theories or reasons for punishment include retribution, vengeance, rehabilitation (or reform) and deterrence. Retribution and vengeance are backward-looking theories, insofar as they understand punishment to be inflicted as a direct consequence of an offence committed in the past, whereas forward-looking theories such as deterrence, rehabilitation and reconciliation are based on the notion that punishment can change the offender and improve society. Retribution is a theory of punishment based on proportionality or desert, and is best summed up by the adage 'the punishment fits the crime', or lex talionis. The theory claims that individuals are free to act as they wish, and that by choosing to offend and break laws, they choose to accept the consequences of their actions. Thus, punishment is a way of restoring an offender's debt to society, owed through offending, as the theory makes the assumption that an offence does not just cause suffering to a human victim but also to society as a whole, thus the offender must suffer proportionally to compensate. ...read more.


However, career criminals or those who offend to survive either do not believe they will be caught or are prepared to chance and endure the punishments arising from committing such an offence, either because they offend for a living or offend to survive. No matter how harsh punishments may be, those who are determined enough to offend will not be deterred. For example, people who steal food to survive are prepared to risk incarceration as they will die if they do not commit the offence. The advantages and disadvantages of the theories of punishment above show that one system on its own cannot fully encompass the administration of punishment necessary to operate a legal system. Many countries, including the UK, operate a hybrid system, whereby retributive theory operates in conjunction with rehabilitation, so that whilst offenders are suffering through deprivation of liberty and/or remuneration, they are also undergoing rehabilitative programmes so that when they have finished their sentence they have been both punished and reformed so that they are better citizens. Vengeance theory is generally not employed by legal systems, as examples of vigilantism in the UK following the publication of the names and addresses of paedophiles shows the vicious and primal nature of uncontrolled emotion when manifested into a thirst for revenge. a. Categorical Imperative Kant's approach to justice is based on his theories of respect and of behaviour according to the Categorical Imperative. ...read more.


Something is right if it leads to something good, and the definition of good, and thus the definition of a good action, is known innately but is not describable. Intuitionists argue that the norms that seem self-evident to us; should be taught by personal example, verbal instruction, praise and blame, and reward and punishment. The extent and appropriateness of punishment is also innately known and understood, which also implies an innate sense of proportion as well, thus people intuitively know that it is 'over the top', for example, to sentence someone to death for the theft of an apple, whereas a long prison sentence or execution for the crime premeditated murder is 'right'. Intuitionists argue that as people 'know' what is right or wrong, most people 'know' and thus choose to break the law, and thus bring punishment upon themselves, subscribing to the retributive theory of justice. Whilst some people may have a different sense of right or wrong, this is discounted as the vast majority of people will intuitively know an action is wrong, and thus it is wrong, even if a few people believe it to be right. However, one of the problems with intuitionism occurs if the society, and thus the moral values, are themselves intrinsically wrong, if, for example, they were to be viewed by an external society. If, for example, we live in a Nazi society, and Nazi norms seem self-evident to us, then Intuitionists would still argue that Nazi norms and intuitions should be taught to our children. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. This paper attempts to analyse Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. In order ...

    Beccaria would probably recognise that zero tolerance could demonstrate and promote the certainty and promptness of a punishment. However, according to Beccaria, for punishment to attain its end, the evil which it inflicts has only to exceed the advantage derivable from the crime.

  2. anti-social behaviour

    Although it does not allow for knowledge of the wider population, and therefore the results can not be generalised because the sample is too small. The third research question relates to the various types of ASBO's. 70% of all respondents were aware that various types of ASBO's existed and 30% stated that they were not aware.

  1. subcultural theory

    The least common response is retreatism. It applies mainly to "outcasts, vagrants, tramps and drug addicts". They have strongly internalized both the cultural goals and accepted means of achieving, however, they are still unable to achieve success. They abandon their goals and drop out of society - defeated and resigned to their fate.

  2. Functionalist accountDurkheim argues that crime is a universal feature of all societies. This is ...

    Hence, norms instruct people in the actions people may legitimately use in the pursuit of goals, and institutionalised means refers to the actual distribution of opportunities for achieving the cultural goals by legitimate means. Goals and norms refer to cultural factors, while institutionalised means 'brings in aspects of the social structure'.

  1. Punishment is difficult to apply in the workplace. Explain why, what might be done ...

    the way" and result in punishment where the employee keeps on thinking that his helpfulness was being punished which further build up a negative feeling towards the punishing agent who can be a manager or a supervisor when they behave in highly critical manner and harass their subordinates.

  2. Describe law and order in London in the late 19th century

    ripper managed to commit these horrific acts and get away with the types of crimes perpetrated.

  1. crime and punishment

    What this lead to is that community policing is affected by another syndrome known as the "public-image" symptom, which used community-"policing wages on the image of crime rather on the crime itself" (Barlow 1999, p. 647). The side effect of the syndrome shows that community policing is not really effective.

  2. public law

    evaluated the effectiveness and necessity of the UCR. The U.S. found an increase in crime rates in the past 10 years, from 1966 to 1976. From there, many organizations and forms of research emerged. "Crime Stoppers" is one of them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work