• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16
  17. 17
  18. 18
  19. 19

Find out what subjects girls study more in higher education as well as for boys. Why are girls less likely then boys to study science and technology subjects? Create and carry out questionnaires similar to Dale spender research.

Extracts from this document...


Rational "What is considered inherently interesting is knowledge about men. Because men control the records, and the value system, it is generally believed that it is men who have done all the exciting things: it is men who have made history, made discoveries, made inventions and performed feats of skill and courage - according to men. These are the important activities and only men become the curriculum." (Dale Spender 1982) The above quite reflects the findings and attitude of Dale Spender, a female sociologist. She believed that his is the reason why females were underachieving during this time and females were gendered into caring subjects. To remove this gender difference the national curriculum, and programs such as the "Girls into science and technology" was introduced. The national curriculum helped girls under achievement. Today girls are now outperforming boys. However there is still a clear difference in subject choice by gender. Girls still tend to study and take up careers in the arts and social science where as males study science and technological subjects in higher education. I am currently a college student studying A levels in Information communication technology, biology, chemistry and sociology. In my scin3ece and technology subjects I have observed that there is a small female presence in the classroom, but in my sociology classroom the majority of students are females. These differences have influenced me to carry out this research project under the current hypotheses. Secondly research carried out by Alison Kelly in the Missing Half: Girls and science Education (1981) has also influenced my subject choice for this project. Alison Kelly found that girls do not study science because they cannot associate them with something that girls do. Thirdly the consideration of the availability of material, research, statistics and research subjects. Hypothesis: Girls are less likely then boys to study science and technology subjects in Higher education because these subjects are seen as masculine subjects. ...read more.


My second Objective was: 2. Why are girls less likely then boys to study science and technology subjects? To conduct this objective I included the following questions on my questionnaire: 2. What are your parents occupation? a. Father b. Mother 3. Why do you think girls are less likely then boys to study science and technology subjects in higher education? (Science and Technology subjects include chemistry, biology and Information Communication Technology or Computer Studies) Girls do not perform as well as boys in science and technology subjects. Science and Technology subjects are boy's /masculine subjects. Some careers that girls choose do not require science and technology subjects. Science and technology related careers are male dominated. Females are more caring and have the role of brining up children and prefer social science subjects. Boys are expected to take up science and techonology subjects? (Expected by teachers, family etc). Other Reason: 4. If you are doing or not doing any science or technology related subjects why are you doing them or not doing them? Both males and females saw that girls were less likely then boys to study science and technology related subjects because "Some careers that girls choose do not require science and technology subjects." And for the males and females that were not doing any science or technology related subject the most popular response was that it was not course related. This means that it's not necessary for what the want to study. However the second popular response among girls was that science subjects were seen as being hard. The theory that I am applying to my conclusions and results is that of Alison Kelly. In the Missing half: Girls and Science Education 1981. She states that as long as science and technology subjects have a masculine image, it is more likely that boys rather then girls will choose to study these subjects. In 1987 she observed how teachers of science and technology subjects use boy examples etc. ...read more.


It appears that there are more girls then it actually appears to be studying science subjects such as chemistry and in particular biology. Physics tends to have fewer girls or no girls at all. From figure 3.12 physics and computer studies and maths have very little female presence. In conclusion from my questionnaire two reasons why females did not take up science subjects were that girls view science and technology subjects as being very hard and not course related. Due to the fact that girls are not going into careers that require these science and technology subjects they do not take them. Therefore this suggests that the career choice affects the subjects taken. And the career choice is affected by gender socialisation in the home and education system. Colley concludes that subject choice continues to reflect: "adult male and female social roles and the abilities and attributes assigned to males and females on the bias of these roles in the gender stereotypes of academic subject areas. The information contained in these stereotypes is acquired during socialisation and reinforced by prevailing beliefs, observations of the status quo and educational practices which themselves are influenced by the same stereotypes." Figure 3.12 GCE A level or equivalent entries for young people1: by selected subject, 2001/02 United Kingdom Percentages Males Females 1 Pupils in schools and students in further education institutions aged 16-18 at the start of the academic year in England and in Northern Ireland, and aged 17 in Wales. Pupils in Scotland generally sit Highers one year earlier and the figures relate to the result of pupils in Year S5/S6. 2 England and Wales only. Source: Department for Education and Skills; National Assembly for Wales; Scottish Executive; Northern Ireland Department of Education If more time were allotted I would have conducted my research on a larger area such as interviewing students from different colleges. I would have also liked to look into the home as well. I wanted to conduct observations or carry out interviews to see what affect the home played on subject choice for girls. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Report on: Lowood Institution for Orphan Girls.

    Outdoor corridors lead to most of the rooms. There is one classroom, one refectory, one dormitory for the girls and one each for the teachers and one sick room. Those are the basic rooms and there are only a few others such as storerooms, etc.

  2. Religion can both be a conservative force and an initiator of social change. To ...

    However, Marxists argue that this force was not always positive and beneficial to society. Marxists argue that the primary function of religion is to reproduce, maintain and legitimate class inequality acting as an "ideological apparatus" which reflects the ruling class' beliefs.

  1. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    The Education Reform Act of 1988 allows schools to recruit extra pupils if there is a demand rather than having a limit imposed by the local education authorities, which occurred before the act. Open enrolment was seen as away of rewarding successful schools and encouraging schools to bring about improvements.

  2. Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to ...

    In conclusion Functionalists and Marxist have similar and also differential ideas towards education. Both perspectives are macro theories and have a degree understanding level of "shifting and sorting".

  1. Assess the strengths and limitations of participant observation for the study of labelling in ...

    It ignores what effect it has on the labelled student also, which means results are not accurate and are very vague. Lastly, the Hawthorne effect has a major impact on the results of participant observation. As most classroom studies have to be overt to protect the student's identity, there are

  2. Examine sociological explanations of the relationship between education and the economy

    Not all children are passive products of the education system it might motivate some children with the thought of ending up in a factory. Paul Willis conducted his survey in 1977 and provides internationalist approach to understand the meanings pupils.

  1. Sociological explanations of under achievement.

    on social backgrounds, they believe that a person with a high class background is more likely to attend higher qualification or higher occupations, as if we consider interactionalists theory so we find their views quite different although their views are ideal in some issues with functionalists because they both see

  2. Assess the claim that the nuclear family as a dominant form of family structure ...

    Different ethnic groups will have different customs and beliefs. Beliefs in contraception can affect areas of the family such as family size, stability and the division of labour. Fourthly, cohort diversity describes the generational links between the family in which children may have different experiences to their parents at the same age.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work