• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Functionalist analysis of education

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

SOCIOLOGY: EDUCATION The functionalist argument that schools serve the interests of the individual and the society can be supported. That is, we are focusing on education in terms of the purposes served by this institution in relation to the overall social structure of society. Mainly Functionalist, theorists see the role of schools and education as being that of an institution charged with making people different educationally and selection of individuals into adult work-related roles. Durkheim's theoretical position was that the education system should be seen as an agency of secondary socialisation. As the family is an agency of primary socialisation (performing the initial socialising functions required to integrate children into their immediate culture), the education system is an institution that "broadens the individual's experience" of the social world. It prepares people for adult role relationships. One of the primary functions of the education system in an industrialised society is that of socialising people into instrumental relationships. These are relationships based upon what people can do for us in return for the things that we can do for them. Therefore education serves in the interest of the individual. In Durkheim's terms, people have to learn how to develop instrumental relationships and the education system effectively serves this kind of function. ...read more.

Middle

Also the school encourages individual competition and the influence of social stratification largely prevents the school system from efficiently grading individuals in terms of ability this does not seem to favour the individuals. Theorists like Illich suggest schools create mindless, conforming and easily manipulated individuals. They are learning to defer to authority to accept alienation and to forget how to think for themselves. This then prepares the pupils for their roles as consumers to who the passive consumption of goods and services becomes an end in itself. This therefore means only society can benefit from this social solidarity and reluctance to question authority and routine, and the ruling class can keep power. For Functionalists schools can produce social consensus, involving shared norms, values, beliefs and so forth. Society, in this respect operates for the ultimate benefit of all and individuals benefit from the skills and knowledge gained to fulfil their roles in society. For Conflict theorists the emphasis is placed upon the ways that a powerful, politically and economically dominant, social class attempts to use the education system and schools as a means of reproducing their domination over time. ...read more.

Conclusion

The role of education is therefore to give people the impression the educational system is based on merit and to control and limit people's expectations. This is false class consciousness. The main opposition to this theory of ruling class ideology and false class consciousness is that it seems to state that people have no choice and conform to the ideas they are presented with. But Paul Willis has shown that people may have some understanding of the way they are treated in school and they may try to resist in various ways. Willis argues that many working class children do resist the ideological messages transmitted through the education system. Some may argue that education produces students that can see through the system and rebel against it. Overall there is a very strong argument that education is beneficial to the ruling class in a society and the ruling class can produce an ideology that all future generations will conform to thus keeping social order and control over them. This then can cover their true identities as exploited workers in the future. However education does not totally benefit the ruling class as it teaches pupils skills and values that may enable them to achieve a high status and may educate them into realising the situation they are in. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    The final major criticism comes from the Interactionists, who see Functionalist views as too deterministic, as they ignore the power of what they refer to as individual 'actors' to interpret and negotiate their educational experience. One of the main critics of the Functionalist perspective is the Marxists, whose theorists can

  2. What is education for? Critically evaluate the diverse functions of education with reference to ...

    norm and has done little to change the inequality of choices and opportunities available to certain sections within society. The demands for an education system to meet the needs of the economy as opposed to the individual are still a top priority and would seem to be pursued with as much vigour if not more than there predecessors.

  1. 'The function of education is to reproduce and legitimate social inequality. Discuss.'

    the workers do not rebel against owners or capitalists, nor do the working class attempt to change the system that does not work for them. According to Bowles and Gintis, the pupil is powerless to the choice of subjects which they learn and how they are taught.

  2. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    in the job hierarchy to a level most suited to their abilities. Equally importantly schools teach the value of equality of opportunity. Pupils in schools are treated with universalistic values in a meritocratic system; therefore all are treated equally and do well or badly through their own effort and ability.

  1. Report on: Lowood Institution for Orphan Girls.

    It sometimes takes longer than three hours if it is very cold and the conditions are bad. 5 Conclusion 5.1 Good Elements of Lowood School * There is a wide variety of subjects studied, which is vital for a decent education.

  2. Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to ...

    Bowles and Ginitis based their study on schooling in capitalist America. They argue that the major role of education is the reproduction of labour power. The correspondence principle provides the key to understand the workings of the education system. Education is subservient to the needs of those who control the workforce and the means of production.

  1. Do TNCs benefit LEDCs?

    Workers are often forced to work long hours; they seldom receive overtime pay, and risk being harassed, fired or even jailed for protesting for their rights. Multinational companies are free to locate where there are the lowest wages, so in order to maintain jobs in manufacturing, workers must compete to

  2. 'Education is a tool of the ruling class'- Discuss.

    The way in which schools are organised was also looked at; everyday rules and routines were concluded as a way in which to transmit different messages to middle and working class kids. Streaming and exams were said to be there to convince working class kids that their knowledge and experiences

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work