• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

How Far Has the Work of Labelling Theorists and Interactionists Helped Us to Understand Why Some People Become Criminal and Others Do Not?

Extracts from this document...


How Far Has the Work of Labelling Theorists and Interactionists Helped Us to Understand Why Some People Become Criminal and Others Do Not? Most sociologists ask what the causes of crime are and try to solve crime by preventing these causes, however, labelling and interaction theorists ask why some behaviour is labelled deviant while other behaviour is acceptable. Their arguments have been discussed below. Becker was one labelling theorist who wanted to find how behaviour was labelled deviant and then become criminal. Everyone in society is potentially a criminal as all commit deviant acts. These deviant acts only become criminal when caught and given a punishment. Becker's study of Football Hooliganism shows how a group can be labelled and then creates more deviant acts. Fights at football matches are not a normal thing, they are usually isolated incidents. However, these events can be focused on and escalated to seem like a real problem by the media. The public then labels the people who go to watch football matches as Football Hooligans. The football fans gain a master status, i.e. ...read more.


Fans can also support their teams at home watching on television. Although, it could be counter-argued that people should not have a label placed on them without real cause. Dunning et al claimed that it was not the label that caused football hooliganism or any other kind of behaviour but masculinity. They claimed that the lower classes feel a need to prove them, and therefore fight in order to demonstrate their masculinity. This may explain persistent football hooligans, but it does not explain those who only get involved in it once or twice. Taylor found that the most common excuse was that they were "caught up in the moment" and that it was not their normal behaviour. Lemert defined two types of deviance, primary and secondary. Primary deviance is the initial act which is not yet labelled but within time becomes labelled. The secondary deviance is when an act is labelled deviant. For example, in a small community in America it was considered to be "abnormal" if a child spoke with a stutter. ...read more.


For example, if a young black male is labelled as a violent, unruly person they will come to believe that they are and then act out their label. The label has been applied and society caused that person to become that label as they can no longer see past it. A criticism of Cooley is that the person who has been labelled is not always aware of it. Therefore if the person is not aware of the label placed upon them, they cannot internalise it and become that label. The person may still become that label by circumstance not attached to the label, but it still has not caused that person to be deviant. In conclusion, the labelling and interaction theories on crime can be applied to specific types of criminal and deviant acts within society such as when the person has recognised they have the label and react negatively to it. The theory does not consider those people who use their label in a positive way or do not realise a label has been placed. Labelling and interaction does occur though so it does explain some crime and deviance but other theories need to be considered to come up with a balanced idea of what causes or creates crime and deviance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Late modern society is thus a high crime society with a low tolerance of crime. The final part of the left realist project is to devise solutions to the problems of crime. They argue we must improve both policing and control and deal with the deeper structural causes of crime.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    of control agents to control deviance can backfire and create more deviance, not less. However, it was the first theory to recognise the role of power in creating deviance, but it fails to analyse the source of this power. For example, Marxists argue that it fails to examine the links between the labelling process and capitalism.

  1. Inequalities within the 'Criminal JUSTICE System/Process'

    Problematic in as much as fundamental decisions may be made that may affect an individual. Morality, culture and politics... About dangerous: Nash (1999 p20) argues that it is often difficult to explain and understand behaviour which is seen as dangerous; therefore it can be seen that the person who kills

  2. How far does Becker's account (The Outsiders 1963) of the processes underlying the selective ...

    who make and enforce the rules, to respond to the title question. As we saw earlier, the existence of a rule does not mean that it will definitely be enforced. " The city dweller minds his own business and does nothing about rule infractions unless it is his own business

  1. How emergency incidents are graded

    a heart attack then the ambulances presence would be essential as they would be able to provide the best possible aid to the individual. The paramedics would be trained and taught the skills which are required for any situation. They would also be provided with equipment which they might need if causalities are injuries severely.

  2. anti-social behaviour

    an ASBO "the crime reduction charity looked in detail at 137 cases and found that many young people had no clear understanding of the detailed restrictions in their orders" (http://www.guardian,co,uk/2006/, Teenagers see ASBO's as badge of honour Nov 2 2006, Accessed: 2008 March 20).

  1. "Prison makes bad people worse". Critically evaluate this statement in the light of rising ...

    would be if no punishment were imposed at all, (Cavadino & Dignan, 1997). This theory also suggests that society as a whole, has a greater influence than the individual and therefore an offender would be powerless to justify not going to prison if he/she had committed a crime that endangered public safety, (Abercrombie, Hill, & Turner, 1988).

  2. Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    This finally leads to a self fulfilling prophecy, if the label becomes deeply accepted the individual may display signs of deviant activity connected with the label, seeing people they believe are deviant anyway, this completes the process. The attachment of labels has important consequences for how others see a person and how he/she comes to view themselves.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work