• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Identify & Discuss The Factors Which Will Influence A Researchers Choice Of Methods

Extracts from this document...


Identify & Discuss The Factors Which Will Influence A Researchers Choice Of Methods When researchers decide to carry out investigations and studies, they must first decide how they are going obtain the accurate data, which they need to support their initial hypothesis and aim. Once the researcher has selected the topic, which they want to investigate, they need to choose the correct methods to collect their data. The choice of the methods they use depends on a number of factors. For example, there are practical considerations, in some cases participant observation or researcher participation may be a better way of investigating behaviour in gangs, than asking the members to fill out questionnaires and participate in interviews. On the other hand, interviews, questionnaires may be better used in other research topic circumstances, in which they provide important statistical data, from which general conclusions can be generalised from. Halfpenny (1984)1, suggests that there are, 'Two main research traditions or approaches to research with sociology". Firstly, there are Positivist researchers. These researchers, when deciding methods to use in their research use hard quantitative data, such as questionnaires and surveys, mainly using first hand primary data. They gather numerical data, for example questionnaires, which have several advantages. ...read more.


Positivist sociologists would then ask why this is and try to identify a small number of factors, which would explain this, gaining their conclusions from the hard evidence. An example of positivist research comes from Albert Cohen (1998)5. He suggested that Crime was a solution to the problem of status frustration. Young men were frustrated in trying to gain status in legal ways and therefore by becoming delinquents and engaging in unsocial activities, they achieved a certain kind of higher status within their peers. By doing this, he could see cause and effect and determine casual relations. However there are many disadvantages to using scientific methods, mainly concerning ethics and the fact that if the evidence is gained from, say a laboratory experiment, then how far can you generalise it to outside life and everyday social interactions? Another sociological approach comes from sociologists known as Interprevists. These researchers prefer to understand human behaviour by seeing the world through the eyes of those being studied. They believed that people give meaning to their own behaviour and to the behaviour of others. Therefore to understand their behaviour, you have to discover and interpret the meanings, which give their actions. ...read more.


For example road accidents are rarely seen as suicides, while drownings, hangings and drug overdoses are more likely to be put down as suicides. Therefore, this shows that you cannot generalise completely. There may be circumstances. By using official data, like Positivists do, you just generalise to one situation, you are not allowing any other conclusions to come from it, there may be exceptions, such as a road accident could have been intended rather than just an accident. The interpretivist views allow us to see all aspects of a circumstance and generalise all to conclusions, instead of having one preset idea. By having a preset idea, the world does not work in that way, society has exceptions, so you should not collectively generalise situations. Societies are all different, so are individuals, so they should allow their owning meanings of situations to be put across. It is said that, 'qualitative research has traditionally been used predominantly in the Social sciences such as in Sociology' Denzin & Lincoln (1994).9 In conclusion, there are many different viewpoints on how researchers should choose their methods when studying a topic. While both sides have their pro's and cons, either way can be used. Some circumstances call for one type of view to be used, for example Positivists, while another may need an Interpretivist viewpoint. Maybe a combination of the both can allow better results (triangulation). ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Can and should sociology be a science?

    But Khun also said that for a subject to be really considered a science, it should at least have a prevailing paradigm, an overriding belief system that most practitioners believe. Sociology is pre-paradigm. Sociology should not be a science until it has a single paradigm agreed by all sociologists.

  2. Examine the ways in which practical, ethical and theoretical factors may influence a sociologists ...

    They favour qualitative data e.g. through informal interviews, observation and personal documents as it produces valid, in-depth and insightful which is also not predefined and can allow the researcher to establish verstehen.

  1. METHODOLGY The research design sets out how the researcher will collect evidence and ...

    being involved with the group but known to be researching or observer as participant, present in the group but taking little active part. During participant observation the researcher is either 'covert' or 'overt'. If a sociologist conceals the fact that they are doing research, they are doing 'covert' research.

  2. Gender and subject choice.

    "Why did you choose Biology?", and "What did you think of it ?(in comparison to GCSE level), etc. I would record the answers to these open questions as it would be time-consuming to write down many long answers, etc. This would enable me to extract a varied viewpoint on many different students perspectives of subject choice and preference.


    The main strength of the biological approach is that chemotherapy, ECT and psychosurgery can be used to treat the symptoms of abnormal behaviour directly and in a very short time. For example, Ritalin can be used to control ADHD, and Prozac can be used to alleviate depression fairly quickly.

  2. Discuss the usefulness of Quantative and Qualitative Methods in study of Suicide.

    As his methods looked in-depth at the situation around suicide he was able to take much more of in-depth view of suicide on the whole, and consciously make subjective decisions he knew coroners were making. This means that the qualitative method were more useful for looking into how suicide statistics are formed.

  1. Examine some of the factors that influence a researchers choice of method (20 Marks)

    sociological experiment as there would be no other way of gathering information. An example is Lawd Humphries 'tea room' study in the 1960's. He would not have been able to gather the information that he did as his subjects would not have been willing to cooperate as homosexuality was such

  2. Assess the factors that influence a sociologists choice of research method.

    women over 50. Sampling can save time and money, because the larger population cannot be studied. There are different methods of producing a sample. Random sampling is the simplest. Everyone in the population has an equal chance of being in that sample, and it gets rid of bias sampling.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work