• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

In the article Madonna I: Animality and Artifice, Camille Paglia argues that Madonna is the true epitome of feminism.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Gerard Gaba Eng 110D Formalist Analysis Essay In the article ?Madonna I: Animality and Artifice,? Camille Paglia argues that Madonna is the true epitome of feminism. Aside from attempting to persuade her readers that Madonna is the future of feminism, her purpose in writing this essay is to provoke a reaction from the opposing view. As a fellow feminist and as an educator with extensive experience, Paglia structures her essay by using a Model 1 argument flow. After introducing the topic of her essay, the author admitted the validity of the opponent?s position, and then made a response against the opposition. Paglia used an example of induction organization as she revealed her thesis at the conclusion of the essay. Paglia begins the essay by mentioning a controversial music video of Madonna that has been recently released. She begins developing her article by completely embarrassing Madonna as the artist tried to defend her new controversial video. Paglia describes how ?Madonna stumbled, rambled, and ended up seeming far less intelligent that she really is? (par. ...read more.

Middle

7). Paglia might have exaggerated and oversimplified the hypothetical conversation of the mother and daughter, but her mockery of Madonna?s intelligence is significant as it shows her mistakes in oversimplifying the opponent?s position. She develops her essay by introducing some feminist charges regarding ?degradation and humiliation of women? (par. 8). In spite of Madonna?s failure to display competence in answering those charges from feminists, Paglia inserts her impolite defense by saying, ?But who cares what the feminists say anyhow? They have been outrageously negative about Madonna from the start? (par.9). This is a significant statement in her essay because finally, we have a better understanding on Paglia?s thesis. Aside from getting a sense of what she really is arguing about in her essay, this statement also reveals that Paglia has committed a fallacy of the argument ad hominem. She completely ignored the feminist charges on degradation and humiliation. Instead, she attacks the other feminists for their opposing view on Madonna. Furthermore, Paglia inserts another sarcastic remark as she talks about how Cyndi Lauper was awarded as the woman of the year. ...read more.

Conclusion

We can infer from the evidence that she deliberately included these fallacies to spark a reaction not only from the feminists but from the male population as well. She then shares her views on Madonna?s vision of sex as ?both the animality and the artifice? (par. 14). This is interesting because this affirms how constricted the ideas of Paglia are. While Paglia attempts to persuade her readers that ?Madonna is the future of feminism,? (par. 16) she is limited to the idea that women empowerment is only grounded by sexuality. Perhaps she decided to focus on this aspect alone, but her overall effect to persuade its readers that Madonna is the epitome of feminism is not very effective. Using an induction organization to present her thesis, she fails to persuade the readers of her ideas. Her mockery and her humiliation of Madonna?s intellectual ability have overpowered her strange manner of defense against feminist charges on Madonna. Paglia?s mistakes on non sequitur and ad hominem fallacies have made her arguments irrelevant and inappropriate. However, Paglia?s underlying objective in this subtle and complex essay is to provoke a reaction. With no doubt, Paglia has produced a controversial essay, with a controversial topic, and a provocative purpose. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Is Feminism Still Important?

    Women are treated as a reserve army of labour whose help is only requested when employers require it. This is supported by Freedman (2001) who states that women are to be economically dependant on their husbands and should focus on their responsibilities at home.

  2. Sociology Feminism

    play at home, having an equal say about the running of their homes, not being ruled by their husbands, the choice of abortion, the choice of becoming a mother / housewife or having a career.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work