• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

It has been claimed that hate crimes are an 'Orwellian response to prejudice'. How convincing are the justifications provided for such laws and what are the chief objections against them?

Extracts from this document...


It has been claimed that hate crimes are an 'Orwellian response to prejudice'. How convincing are the justifications provided for such laws and what are the chief objections against them? George Orwell's novel '1984' is a fictional story in which the government attempts to control the speech, actions and even the thoughts of the public. Unacceptable thoughts are a breach of the law and are called 'thought crimes'. An 'Orwellian response to prejudice' is therefore one in which the state regulates every aspect of social life including controlling the thoughts of individuals in an attempt to wipe out the opportunity for prejudice thoughts and actions to exist. This essay is going to begin with an outline of the current hate crime laws in the United States and Britain. It will then investigate the arguments in favour of hate crime laws with careful consideration of why these arguments may not be a justifiable and logical basis for these laws. The conclusion will summarise the main points, and attempt to provide an answer to the long-standing debate of whether hate crime laws are justifiable or unjustifiable. Hate crimes make headlines in the media. An example of a few include the brutal murder of Anthony Walker who was axed to death because he was black, the racist killing of Stephen Lawrence, and the homophobic nail bombing on Admiral Duncan pub, a gay pub in Soho, which killed three people. ...read more.


*** (fragment consider revising) The weakness of this argument is that evidence also shows that some victims of crimes motivated by reasons other than hate were more emotionally affected than some of those victims targeted because of hate. Again the subject of averages crops up****, is it just to give an individual offender a more severe punishment because the law of averages suggest that victims of hate crimes may be more emotionally affected than victims of otherwise motivated crimes? Thirdly, Supporters of hate crime laws suggest that hate crimes send out a terroristic message. Apparently, an act of violence targeted at a member of a certain group results in repeat victimisation towards other members of this group. This can also create retaliation and counter-retaliation between the victims group and the offenders group. However, opponents of hate crime laws have also found problems with this line of argument. Jacobs and Putter *** suggest that if a hate crime is punished more severely on the basis that it can cause retaliation, the offender is therefore being punished because he chose a victim who is more likely to also break the law by carrying out attacks of retaliation. Although this is a slightly distorted sense of logic, it is a valid counter argument. *** Other types of crime can also be said to have a terroristic result on society, however these are not punished more seriously. Examples of these are crimes against the aged, sexual assaults and rapes, these all create a sense of fear within the community so why is it only hate crimes that receive the more severe punishment? ...read more.


Again, this is unlogical. Just because the objections to hate crime laws propose a stonger argument than those justifying them it does not mean that hate crime laws should not be prosecuted. Cases of this kind should be thouroghly investigated. However, extra punishment for thoughts is not right. *** The only plausible solution is time. As time goes on and diversity continues individuals in newer generations should be more accepting. It is already apparent that the majority of older generations are (stereotypically) less open to minorities than younger generations. As cultural diversity reaches the suburbs and villages there could be a chance that existing prejudices will be whittled out. Laws such as lowering the consent age of gay sex, and allowing gay marriages show that we are living in a more accepting society. These laws reward the victims of hate crime, rather than punish the offenders. This in turn sends out a message to society that these people are to be accepted as equals. Discriminating against someone because of their race, religion, or sexual orientation is incomprehendable although this may be the opinion of the minority. Individuals are entitled to their prejudices just as long as they do not act them out by way of a crime against another human being. We are a part of a tolerant but outspoken society and this is something that we should all value. Current legislation only steps in when a thought is turned into an action. So far this is not infringing our rights to freedom of expression. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. An analysis of The Daily Mail.

    The crime committed against them would be termed as horrific and wicked and the victim would be sometimes referred to with the word 'prey'. The article would usually contain a picture of the victim and the victim would be usually shown as the innocent person.

  2. This paper attempts to analyse Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. In order ...

    A person should be tried by a jury of his peers, and the jury should reflect class differences between the offender and the victim. Beccaria further asserts that trials should be made public so that "opinion, which is the best or the only cement of society, may curb the authority

  1. How emergency incidents are graded

    The roles and responsibilities of the ambulance service are to: * Provide first aid on scene * Locate casualty loading point * Locate casualties * Take causalities to located hospitals When an ambulance attends the scene of an accident, they have to use their experience, skills and quick thinking to assess the situation as quick as possible.

  2. Tacking crimes involving in juvenile

    offences after engaging with a YIP, similarly those who had not offended previously but who were at risk, 74% did not go on to be arrested after engaging with YIP (YIP 2008). Research by government's Youth justice Board showed that anti social behaviour orders ASBO are widely seen as badges of honour by offending teenagers.

  1. Examine the ways in which social policy and laws may have influenced families and ...

    then, cohabiting couples or single parent families ect, this not focusing on couples who choose to cohabit, to so something about It therefore more people will be wanting to marry having an influence on the family and household. Another policy that may have an influence on the family is 'The

  2. Does the media heighten fear of crime?

    Chandler (1995) adds that another major criticism lies in that the cultivation theory tends to ignore the importance of social dynamics in television use such as one's viewing experience, the individual's general knowledge, their gender, ethnicity, viewing contexts, family attitudes, and their socio-economics and so on.

  1. A critique of policy or a piece of research - The British Crime Survey.

    * Possible alternative research methods * Values and ethics raised or overlooked * Future improvements These have been chosen as they will demonstrate the ideas behind the methods used in the BCS. It is the opinion of this essay that suggesting the positives as well as the negatives plays a role in the creation of future BCS's.

  2. Describe law and order in London in the late 19th century

    During the 30th of September, there were two more murders. Elizabeth Stride's dead body was found in Berner Street at around 1.00am with her throat savagely cut. It not known whether she was a victim of the Whitechapel Murderer who might have been interrupted or if it was a coincidental murderer.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work