• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Most sociologists acknowledge that there is a definite link between location and crime, along with other aspects such as ethnicity and gender and try to link parallels with it.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Most sociologists acknowledge that there is a definite link between location and crime, along with other aspects such as ethnicity and gender and try to link parallels with it. Some theorists, such as Right Realism, believe that crime flourishes in situations where social control breaks down. In all communities there are people that engage in incivilities, e.g. dropping litter or partaking in vandalism, and in most, they are prevented from progressing further with crime as other members hold this in check by their reactions. However, if these incivilities are left unchecked, the entire social order of the areas breaks down and gradually there is a shift toward more frequent and serious crime. James Q Wilson (1982) deduced the Broken Windows Theory to back this view paralleling this to an abandoned building and challenged whether anyone has seen just one window broken; therefore evidencing the flourishing of crime in such areas. Some theories such as Left Realism agree that more crime occurs within Urban areas as stated by Jock Young, however this is in contrast to Right Realists as they then take into account relative deprivation and marginalisation of the people living in that particular area, not simply just geographical area. ...read more.

Middle

Further tightening his approach in order to avoid vagueness criticisms like Shaw & McKay's theory, he stated that definitions vary in frequency, duration, priority, e.g. more influenced during primary socialisation and intensity., ignoring the relationship between geographical area and crime. Not only is this hard to apply to the contemporary UK due to the fact that the theory is not only dated, but more applicable within the USA, as housing policies mirror, in that British research has failed to reproduce the clear pattern of concentric circles that Chicago School has identified. Morris (1957) stated that there was no evidence that people in high areas in high delinquency held a coherent set of values that was any different from that of mainstream society, ignoring the relationship between location and crime, the reason being the council's housing policies in his study of Croydon, the council kept high-problem families together so that almost by definition, it was a high-crime area. To expand on this, applicable to the high-problem zone in Shaw & McKay's theory is the process of 'tipping'. ...read more.

Conclusion

Another theory similar to this was that developed by various sociologists named 'Cognitive Maps'. Patricia and Paul Brantingham, for example, argue that people have different perceptions to others of the area in which they live, depending upon where they live and routes to and from work. Each person then carries in their mind a different image of their city; called a cognitive map. Wiles & Costello extended this further when they studied offenders in Sheffield; finding that offenders on average travelled approximately two miles to commit offences and invariably the area chosen was based on strategic decisions within their routine activities and cognitive maps. In contrast to these, administrative criminology theories such as these have been criticised by Jock Young, as they do not explain why people commit offences within these areas, merely the circumstances that they are more likely to commit them within. Furthermore, it seems illogical that offenders makes calculated decision regarding offending, as some other studies suggest that these are mostly not rational, motivated purely by thrills and the search for excitement, such as that of Katz Pleasure of Crime in the instance of joyriding within contemporary society. ?? ?? ?? ?? Kate Iliff ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    It's also nastier with increase in hate crimes, often the result of relative deprivation downwards, for example attacks against asylum seekers. Reactions to crime by the public and state are also changing. With late modernity society becomes more diverse and there's less public consensus on right and wrong, so that the boundary between acceptable and unacceptable behaviour becomes blurred.

  2. New Right Realism & New Left Realism. The realist approach to crime treats crime ...

    Certain groups may feel pushed out of society with little chance to protest against capitalism or improve their lives. This is due to the lack of organisations to represent their interests in political debate. Also the unemployed have no access to trade unions meaning they have no say in control over the standard unemployed wage packet.

  1. Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors ...

    Murray argues that the crime rate is increasing because of a growing underclass or 'new rabble' who is defined by their deviant behaviour and who fails to socialise their children properly. According to Murray, the underclass is growing in both the USA and the UK as the result of welfare dependency.

  2. subcultural theory

    This evidence suggests that working class deviance can take many different forms. Just as the opportunity to be successful by legitimate means varies, so does the opportunity for success by illegitimate means. Cloward and Ohlin have produced the most sophisticated version of structural and subcultural theory, by combining the work of both Merton and Cohen.

  1. Evaluate Which of the Three Social Factors (Class, Gender, Ethnicity) has the Greatest Impact ...

    The most common answer to this question is opportunity. If one has the opportunity to commit crime, he/she often will. However, you cannot commit a crime if the correct objects and conditions are not there. (IE. You do not have the opportunity.)

  2. Clearly there is a link between alcohol and crime and the government are keen ...

    fixed penalty notices c) To prevent alcohol related violence by i) targeting hotspots ii) developing pub watch whereby local pubs and clubs communicate with police and other establishments to prevent troublemakers moving onto another premise, fore warned is fore armed!

  1. Crime and Ethnicity

    There is a much higher chance of an Afro Caribbean person being stopped and searched (five time higher) then a person from any other ethnic group. This means that they are subjected to stereotypes of society (and the police are part of society), so as they are being stopped more then there is more chance of them being arrested.

  2. Marginalisation theories on Ethnicity and Crime

    However, they do not agree that this is inevitable. Mugging is not a legally defined crime. So how do you measure it? How do you point out when it has happened? They used the statistics of the nearest example of mugging (robbery) which showed an annual rise of 14% between 1965 and 1972.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work