• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and asses sociological explanations of gender differences in the pattern of crime

Extracts from this document...


Outline and asses sociological explanations of gender differences in the pattern of crime By looking at official statistics it would appear that 80% of all crime is committed by men. Crime committed by women is generally more minor and men commit more crime in every area with the exception of shoplifting. However in the past 10 years female crime has increased three fold. Although women only make up 4% of the prison population, in the 1970's government experts predicted that there would be no women in prison at all, which has evidentially not occurred. Even so men still commit a much higher proportion of crime. An early study into the causes of crime by Lombrosso claimed that men commit more crime as they are more likely to have physical flaws such as an extra nipple creating a more ape like appearance. By studying criminals in one Italian prison he argued that a more ape like features that he claimed could be seen in convicts and not in the prison officers, suggested that the individual was less evolved and therefore predisposed to committing crime. He noted that women are less likely to have these flaws and are therefore not born criminals explaining less female criminal activities. However Lombrosso ignored socialisation as being a factor in creating a criminal disposition, which is the idea favoured by most sociologists. ...read more.


It also coheres with phenomenologist Matza, who said that crime is the product of subterranean values which usually hide beneath our socially accepted values. However during times of 'drift' such as youth, when the individual is subject to few social bonds one may act on criminal urges. As males are said to have weaker social bonds due to informal agents such as parents often being less strict they are able to commit more crime, giving explanation for the differences in crime rates. The Functionalist, Merton argues that crime is committed due to monetary needs. He studied young men and found due to blocked opportunities such as poor education they were unable to meet the socially ascribed goals. Instead they could 'innovate' and gain monetary success through unlawful means. This would explain why men commit more crime as they are under more social pressures to earn money due to their sex-role socialisation as the bread winner. However Carlen would argue that woman are more likely to be economically marginalised than men and therefore have reason to have given up on the justice system meaning that they should in fact commit more crime. However women do commit more shoplifting than men and their second biggest crime is fraud, so this would cohere with Carlen. ...read more.


Miller took an independent conception approach and claimed that working class males commit crime due to their focal concerns; they commit more crime than other demographics as there culture is different and it leads directly to criminal activities. Focal concerns such as excitement, autonomy, smartness, toughness and trouble lead to crime. These focal concerns need to be followed to prove masculinity, therefore giving an explanation as to why males commit more crimes than females who do not have such social pressures. Miller is able to show the pressures of socialisation mentioned by functionalists. Similarly New Right Realist Murray also studied the working class in his study of what he called "the underclass" referring to those who live entirely off state benefits. He claimed that crime was committed by men due to a lack of paternal role models due to a high amount of single parent families. New Right Realists claim that serious unemployment leads to crime as the perpetrator has fewer responsibilities. In the north of England where there is high male unemployment due to the reduction in manual work, there are also higher crime rates. This would explain why men commit more crime than women. However New Left Realists would disagree and claim that the New Right Realists were over concentrating on the operation of control agencies and that in fact a combination of political marginalisation, relative deprivation and the formation of deviant subcultures leads to crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Asses the arguments and evidence which suggest women commit much less crime than men

    4 star(s)

    She says that there has been a change in the nature of crime; the crime that was traditionally committed by men is now being committed by women. She looked at different statistics and her examination of the American scene concluded that the number of women committing crime and in prison was rising faster than the number of men.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    The chivalry thesis claims that women will be treated more leniently for committing certain ...

    4 star(s)

    this has spurred feminist campaigners to urge police officers to take cases of domestic violence more seriously. Pollak's full chivalry thesis is in short, slightly sexist as it states that 'women are particularly adept at hiding their crimes, this is attributed to female biology '.

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    For example fear of attack prevents women going out at night. At the same time these groups are less likely to report crimes against them and the police are often reluctant to deal with crimes such as domestic violence, rape or racist attacks.

  2. Assess the Sociological explanations of social class differences

    Murray, a right realist, claims that an underclass is emerging in modern western societies and these r to blame for crime rates. He defines an underclass not simply by those with the lowest income at the base of class system; instead it consists of those with low income who behave

  1. Assess sociological explanations of social class differences in crime rates

    class area to implode upon itself', the working class start off from a lower position than others, and commit crimes, mainly against each other because of their poor background. Positivists and Interpretivists have two different outlooks on the official criminal statistics.

  2. Examine the pattern of, and reasons for, domestic violence in society.

    This concept in female incitement is strong aspect of cultural beliefs. In the Dobash study, 31% of women claimed that there were appropriate circumstance in which the man has the right to hit his wife, for neglecting children or perhaps committing fornications outside marriage.

  1. Outline and Assess Sociological Explanations of Gender Differences in Crime Rates.

    Some believe that the figures are misleading and that they rarely show up the data due to other reasons. Otto Pollak in 1950 argued that crimes committed by women go unreported due to the nature of the crimes they commit such as shoplifting and prostitution.

  2. Examine the differences between Muslims living in the UK and Muslims living in Saudi ...

    Usually they are provided with a different diet or because of ignorance from their parents might end up eating the unlawful food. The Muslim youth wonder why they have a limited choice of food, only that which is lawful (Halal)

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work