• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and asses sociological explanations of gender differences in the pattern of crime

Extracts from this document...


Outline and asses sociological explanations of gender differences in the pattern of crime By looking at official statistics it would appear that 80% of all crime is committed by men. Crime committed by women is generally more minor and men commit more crime in every area with the exception of shoplifting. However in the past 10 years female crime has increased three fold. Although women only make up 4% of the prison population, in the 1970's government experts predicted that there would be no women in prison at all, which has evidentially not occurred. Even so men still commit a much higher proportion of crime. An early study into the causes of crime by Lombrosso claimed that men commit more crime as they are more likely to have physical flaws such as an extra nipple creating a more ape like appearance. By studying criminals in one Italian prison he argued that a more ape like features that he claimed could be seen in convicts and not in the prison officers, suggested that the individual was less evolved and therefore predisposed to committing crime. He noted that women are less likely to have these flaws and are therefore not born criminals explaining less female criminal activities. However Lombrosso ignored socialisation as being a factor in creating a criminal disposition, which is the idea favoured by most sociologists. ...read more.


It also coheres with phenomenologist Matza, who said that crime is the product of subterranean values which usually hide beneath our socially accepted values. However during times of 'drift' such as youth, when the individual is subject to few social bonds one may act on criminal urges. As males are said to have weaker social bonds due to informal agents such as parents often being less strict they are able to commit more crime, giving explanation for the differences in crime rates. The Functionalist, Merton argues that crime is committed due to monetary needs. He studied young men and found due to blocked opportunities such as poor education they were unable to meet the socially ascribed goals. Instead they could 'innovate' and gain monetary success through unlawful means. This would explain why men commit more crime as they are under more social pressures to earn money due to their sex-role socialisation as the bread winner. However Carlen would argue that woman are more likely to be economically marginalised than men and therefore have reason to have given up on the justice system meaning that they should in fact commit more crime. However women do commit more shoplifting than men and their second biggest crime is fraud, so this would cohere with Carlen. ...read more.


Miller took an independent conception approach and claimed that working class males commit crime due to their focal concerns; they commit more crime than other demographics as there culture is different and it leads directly to criminal activities. Focal concerns such as excitement, autonomy, smartness, toughness and trouble lead to crime. These focal concerns need to be followed to prove masculinity, therefore giving an explanation as to why males commit more crimes than females who do not have such social pressures. Miller is able to show the pressures of socialisation mentioned by functionalists. Similarly New Right Realist Murray also studied the working class in his study of what he called "the underclass" referring to those who live entirely off state benefits. He claimed that crime was committed by men due to a lack of paternal role models due to a high amount of single parent families. New Right Realists claim that serious unemployment leads to crime as the perpetrator has fewer responsibilities. In the north of England where there is high male unemployment due to the reduction in manual work, there are also higher crime rates. This would explain why men commit more crime than women. However New Left Realists would disagree and claim that the New Right Realists were over concentrating on the operation of control agencies and that in fact a combination of political marginalisation, relative deprivation and the formation of deviant subcultures leads to crime. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    The chivalry thesis claims that women will be treated more leniently for committing certain ...

    4 star(s)

    Because of his inadequate analysis the theory has been subject to a heavy and fierce amount of criticism.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    The second part of the left realist project to take crime seriously involves explain the rise in crime. Lea and Young (1984) identify three related causes of crime; relative deprivation, subculture and marginalisation. Lea and Young argue crime has roots in deprivation.

  1. Outline and Assess Sociological Explanations of Gender Differences in Crime Rates.

    Some believe that the figures are misleading and that they rarely show up the data due to other reasons. Otto Pollak in 1950 argued that crimes committed by women go unreported due to the nature of the crimes they commit such as shoplifting and prostitution.

  2. Assess sociological explanations of social class differences in crime rates

    Marxists argue that the ruling class (bourgeoisie) commit all the corporate crime they want without punishment, but the overall less damaging crime of the proletariat is harshly punished. From a left realist perspective, the cultural issues of relative deprivation and individualism have, according to Jock Young ' caused the working

  1. Examine some of the reasons why females may be less likely than males to ...

    Women who are violent and aggressive - characteristics required for some types of crime, are liable to be negatively labelled. Heidensohn suggests that control theory can be applied to gender and crime and can explain why so few women get involved in crime.

  2. Assess the Sociological explanations of social class differences

    Murray, a right realist, claims that an underclass is emerging in modern western societies and these r to blame for crime rates. He defines an underclass not simply by those with the lowest income at the base of class system; instead it consists of those with low income who behave

  1. Free essay

    Assess sociological explanations of the different crime rates of men and women.

    They conducted a longitudinal study of female offenders which led them to find that female offenders were much more likely to have had harsh or erratic parenting, and to have had little support or praise from their parents for their achievements at school and in their community.

  2. crimes committed by males and females

    Hence they generally have less opportunity for committing 'white collar' crimes such as fraud, embezzlement, etc. I am interested however, to find out whether females being socialised in a different way and lacking opportunity are the key factors in explaining low rates of female crime.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work