• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of the role of the education system.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of the role of the education system. (50) ________________ As a theory which places heavy emphasis on the analysis of institutions and their relationship with society, especially with regards to the functions of institutions, Functionalists place a significant amount of focus on the education system. However, this perspective is not always accepted, it?s macro theory approach is often seen as too wide bearing to be applied to the study of the education system as well as critics which dispute the functions of the education system as portrayed by functionalists. Nevertheless, its macro theory approach puts the education system in context and is therefore a theory which is notable when discussing the role of the education system. Firstly, it cannot be ignored that one of the main principles of the theory is that society is based upon consensus, - agreement between norms and values. As an institution of secondary socialisation, Functionalist theorists see the education system as one of the main institutions which help to achieve value consensus within society, allowing society to operate in a smooth manner. Durkheim suggested that the education system is an institution which helps to create a ?collective consciousness?, uniting society into one body, with the system creating ?social beings?. ...read more.

Middle

For Marxists, the education system is not one which is based upon the principles of equal opportunities, but one which serves to promote the myth of meritocracy, socialising children to accept in equality as endemic and hence keeping class position fixed. Support for Marxists and therefore a statistic which is against the view is that at secondary level, class is a very influential factor over results, with a national 40% divide in performance between the lower and middle class. As a result, it could very much be argued that the education system does not provide social mobility through meritocracy but rather acts as a form of state control, with middle class and upper class (the bourgeoisie) using the education system to maintain dominance. Whilst, we do know that the state does place key emphasis on using the education system as an institution which provides social mobility, with Tony Blair claiming that his priorities were ?education, education, education?, in addition to the introduction of the ?Education Maintenance Allowance? scheme and the new ?pupil premium? initiative. It could therefore be argued that the functionalist perspective is correct, in that the education system is a system based upon a certain degree of meritocracy. ...read more.

Conclusion

In conclusion, it is clear that Functionalists tend to paint a positive picture of the education system, suggesting that it is an institution which promotes social cohesion, social mobility and economic stability. Through its role as an agent of secondary socialisation, the introduction of the national curriculum and the design of the qualification system, functionalists argue that the education system contributes to the positive function of society and to the benefits of its students. However, critics, mainly from the Marxist perspective find that class inequality is perhaps one of the biggest factors that functionalism ignores. Although, it is often the case that governments (at least in principle) do attempt to champion the education system as an institution of social mobility, with policy which aims to reflect and increase this. Furthermore, support for Functionalism also comes from the overwhelming statistics that countries with more graduates tend to have more highly advanced economies,- support the work of Davis and Moore. In all, Functionalism is a theory which tends to lend itself to looking at the positives of the education system, documenting the benefits of it- which all are founded upon both research and also operating realities in many cases. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

This is a fairly strong essay that compares the Functionalist and Marxist viewpoints using the key theorists and terms. The essay also makes some contemporary links in regard to policies. The essay could benefit from using feminism as a counter argument to Functionalism too as well as further criticisms as to why the Functionalist view is now seen as outdated. Overall: ****

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 10/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the usefulness of feminist contributions to our understanding of society today

    4 star(s)

    Thirdly, women are a source of cheap, exploitable labour, they can be paid less because it is assumed they will be partially dependent on their husbands' earnings. Lastly, women reproduce the labour force through their unpaid domestic labour both by nurturing and socialising children to become the next generation of

  2. Free essay

    Assess the contribution of functionalism to our understanding of society

    3 star(s)

    Status roles come in clusters called institutions. For example, the family is an institution. Related institutions are grouped into sub-systems, for example factories, banks etc. And finally these sub-systems grouped together make up the social system as a whole. Parsons identifies the importance of all these institutions in society, when

  1. "Compare and contrast modernisation theory and dependency theory as explanations of development and under-development"

    Lastly is the age of mass consumption, this is where economic production is high and social and political choices can be made about society this is found in countries like Britain, USA and South Korea. The main idea of modernisation is the last countries mentioned, for example USA has passed

  2. The education system is meritocratic

    use to sift and sort its members into different positions in this way they believe that school is meritocratic. They view meritocracy as allowing the principles of stratification to take place where individuals are place and motivated into different positions.

  1. How do the three factors of class, gender and ethnicity affect achievement in education?

    According to Marxist, capitalism requires a highly motivated workforce and education serves as the reproduction of labour power. This is provided through the hidden curriculum, which shapes the next generation of workers by helping to produce a subservient workforce of uncritical, passive and docile workers.

  2. Identify current patterns of ill health and inequality in the UK. Explain probable ...

    in the smaller shops, this means that in some cases cheap and varied food is only accessible to those that have private transport or are able to pay the cost of public transport. " People on low incomes eat less healthily partly because of cost, rather than lack of concern or information.

  1. Family Diversity

    There are also many advantages to being in a reconstituted family, also known as step family. One of these is; the ex lone parent may now be happier as they have changed partner, the reasons for the separation may have been due to abuse or unhappiness and now that the

  2. Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in ...

    no consensus or harmony in this society because there is no equality. The similarities of both contrasting structural theories are only exterior resemblances and have no associations with the ideas behind them. Firstly, both sociological theories are macro theories. The focus of both theories studies the society as a whole and in a large-scale manner.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work