• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and assess Marxist explanations of crime and deviance.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Julie Wilcox Outline and assess Marxist explanations of crime and deviance. In looking at the Marxist explanation of crime and deviance one must also look to the non-sociologist explanations and those of other different groups in order to come to an informed view of the subject. The non-sociologist definition of crime and deviance would be that deviance is uncommon behaviour, something that offends the morals or the majority of society, without being harmful or serious enough to be criminal. Whereas a criminal act is an act which causes harm to someone else enough to warrant a decision-maker passing a law which forbids the act. The Marxist theory in general splits society in half, the rich and the poor. With the poor being exploited by the rich. This theory appears to be the basis for all Marxist perspective including the Marxist explanations of crime and deviance. Karl Marx stated that crime was the product of poverty and the traditional Marxist view regarding the cause of crime amongst the working classes is competition and the desire to acquire wealth. The working class people want the 'things' that they see the middle classes with but they cant afford them so they resort to stealing. The explanation of the cause of the majority of crime is given as the people fighting back against the oppression of a corrupt capitalist society. ...read more.

Middle

This leans more towards the Marxist view that law is the reflection of the will of the powerful. The social constructionalists believe that deviant behaviour is only defined as such through the behaviour of other people. They consider the main cause of crime to be groups imposing their definitions on others. According to the social constructionist labelling theory there is not much difference between deviants and non-deviants, the only reason they are labelled deviant is because other people see their behaviour as unusual or abnormal but this theory asks the question who is the deviant. The labelling theory would agree with the Marxist perspective that once people are given labels with certain expectations they will live up to those labels or society will see them according to their labels, for example social class. Functionalist Emile Durkheim argued that crime is necessary to society as it allows boundaries to be re-enforced. Durkheim believed that society is held together by shared economic values, that when a person is arrested for a crime they are clarifying the boundaries of acceptable behaviour and giving society an opportunity to reaffirm these values thus safeguarding a continued social cohesion. Erikson agreed with this theory pointing out the drama of a court room scene and the media involved in a court case again publicising the boundaries as well as condemning the criminal act. ...read more.

Conclusion

Policing is selective there is a higher presence inner city areas, targets are raised and more people are arrested and discriminated against because of their age race or financial background. This results in manipulated statistics as shown in the research by Hall et Al. Functionalist Hirschi asked the question who don't people commit crime suggesting that without social pressure crime would not be deemed deviant and society would break down. From a totally different perspective Marxist Steven Box agreed that without the controlling agencies capitalist society would break down suggesting that the law enforcement agencies and judiciary system serve only to keep the proletariat working in order to provide economic security for the bourgeoisie. A breakdown of the agencies of control would lead to crime, which would risk the positions of the middle classes. The Marxist explanation of crime and deviance is exactly that a view from one section of society. The area of crime and deviance is so vast with so many different opinions to come to a complete explanation one would have to look at all views and form a personal opinion. None of the perspective can be deemed right or wrong each has aspects that could be considered completely biased as well as aspects that could be merged into other perspectives. The Marxist view that the ruling classes create and uphold the laws to protect their position in society could be considered more biased and less flexible than most but again that would be down to personal opinion. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

    4 star(s)

    for success did not mean that people simply gave-up wanting to be successful. This was not possible because the whole thrust of their socialisation was geared towards the value of success. In a situation whereby people desired success - yet were effectively denied it - he argued that people would find other, probably more unlawful, means towards desired ends.

  2. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    The weakness of labelling theory is that it does not explain why some people become deviant and others do not. Although it focuses on the behaviours and beliefs of officials in the enforcement system, labelling theory does not explain why those officials define some behaviours as deviant or criminal, but not others.

  1. Critically Compare and Contrast Functionalist and Traditional Marxist Perspectives On Crime.

    people offend whereas others do not and there is no argument on laws and their validity on how they benefit society as a whole. Marxists would strongly criticise the way Durkheim seems to be ignorant of the 'concepts of power' and how a small number of people in power have

  2. describe four studies relating to crime and deviance - each from a different perspective. ...

    It is the realisation that these goals are unattainable to them that creates 'status frustration' and a sense of rejection. Cohen suggests that to address this frustration new goals are created as a way of achieving some form of status.

  1. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    by applying those rules to particular people and labelling them as outsiders.' So Becker is saying that society creates the rules, deviant activity is not intrinsically different to any other, it just steps outside the boundaries of social acceptance. An example would be a deviant drug taker injecting him self

  2. Outline and Assess Sociological Approaches to Social Control Within Crime and Deviance

    This definition reflects modern societies more effectively than absolutist definitions. It takes into account the constantly changing nature of deviance and can be combined with a reactivist definition to provide a fuller picture of the process of deviancy creation. However, it fails to explain why some norms are considered more

  1. Critically evaluate Marxists contributions to the study of crime and deviance.

    Jock Young put forward the example about the polices reaction towards the hippies in Notting Hill. He states that 'the police saw the hippies as 'dirty, scruffy, idle, promiscuous, depraved, good for nothing and drug addicts". This shows that the polices initial instincts as it shows that they naturally assumed

  2. Asses the Marxist Perspective on Crime

    Echoing Merton's 'strain theory', Marxists argue that those with barriers to success, from the businessman to the factory worker, are pressured to break the law in order to achieve the material desires which capitalism encourages. Marx's theory of alienation can be applied to those crimes which have no apparent financial

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work