• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline and evaluate the Marxist view of the family

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

´╗┐Outline and evaluate the Marxist view of the family Marxism looks at the methods of control of the ruling class (bourgeoisie) in determining the way society is organized. The family is seen as part of the structure of society and is one of a number of social institutions which help maintain the capitalist system. Marxists state that it is the requirements of this system that has come to shape the family in modern societies. From a Marxist perspective, society revolves around the infrastructure and social superstructure. The superstructure maintains the infrastructure whilst the infrastructure shapes the superstructure. ...read more.

Middle

Engels stated that this system is maintained by the socialisation of capitalist social norms and values. Marxists do not see this as benefiting the family at all, only the system, and therefore this helps support their theory that the family exists as a largely negative institution. Zaretsky (1979) looked at the change in the family from a unit of production to a unit of consumption. Like Engels, he noted that socialisation was used to instill values and norms applicable to the system of capitalism. He saw the family as a tool of capitalist society that is vital for its survival, and observed how many features of the modern family supported it, like spending on leisure activities and encouraging aspirations such as owning a house and attaining wealth. ...read more.

Conclusion

The family was observed to provide a source of satisfaction that cannot be found in society as a whole, something that bears similarities to the functionalist 'warm bath theory'. In conclusion, the Marxist view of the family is mostly negative. It sees many of the key features of the family as mechanisms of capitalist society, and differs greatly from other sociological theories such as functionalism, which presents a comforting image of the family. Critics of Marxist viewpoints include Somerville (2000), who claimed that Zaretsky did not take the element of the 'dark side of the family' into account when discussing its supportive qualities. Its extensive focus on class division could be seen as another negative feature of Marxist theory on family, as it appears to ignore other factors such as gender and ethnicity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Family & Marriage section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

5 star(s)

A brief but effective piece of work regarding Marxism and the family. The theory was outlined well, and there was good use of other theorists to critique/support it. The writer evidenced clear knowledge of not just Marxism but Functionalism also.
Consider how you could develop the work regarding Marx's narrow focus on class - why exactly is it a weakness?
5/5

Marked by teacher Diane Apeah-Kubi 28/06/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Family & Marriage essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the View that the Family is a Universal Institution

    3 star(s)

    The commune is a group of people sharing chores, yet a family is connected by blood and love. However, in the commune there are families living there so in parts of the commune you can class as a family. But this is only because they are connected by blood.

  2. Examine the view that the nuclear family is universal. (24)

    After puberty, the Nayar girl began taking visiting husbands, often warriors who spent long period of time away from their villages acting as mercenaries. During their time in the village they were allowed to visit any number of Nayar women who had undergone the tail rite and were members of the same caste or lower.

  1. Sociology The Family

    For example, feminists look at the male dominated nature of the traditional family structure and the existence of violence within the private sphere. Functionalists do not tend to consider alternatives to the family. For example an Israeli kibbutz carries out the functions of the family but it does not fit the 'typical' or 'nuclear' definition of a family.

  2. Assess the view that the nuclear family is no longer the norm

    Furthermore, the Rapoports believe that diversity is the most important concept when trying to understand family life today. They talk about five types of family diversity: organisational (differences in members' roles within families), cultural (difference in family structure depending on culture, ethnicity and religion - e.g.

  1. Discuss the view that the modern family is becoming more diverse

    One issue that arises is the confusion of the family within the household. Households in Britain basically have the general form of a nuclear family rather than extended families. From the sixteenth to the nineteenth century the average household accommodated less than five people (Laslett and Wall 1972).

  2. The nuclear family is considered the 'ideal'. Why and for whom?

    With a Marxist view in mind, a nuclear family, re-constituted or single parent family, are all very much doing the same job in those terms; they are both mass consuming which supports the economy and socialising children within their class.

  1. Gay Marriage - persuasive essay.

    Historical figures from America's history to now have always promised equal rights for everyone, yet hays seem to continue to be discriminated against. The basis of America has always been freedom and equality for all, discarding all of homosexuals who are granted limited marriage rights.

  2. Sociology Family Revision Notes

    Statistics on household composition are misleading as they only show a snapshot point of their life- does not show the future as they would be likely to live in a nuclear family. Evidence that there have been no major changes; Most people live in households that are headed by married couple.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work