• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Outline some of the ways in which some marketisation and selection policies may produce social class differences in educational achievement.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Outline some of the ways in which some marketisation and selection policies may produce social class differences in educational achievement. (12 marks) Marketisation is the policy of introducing market forces of supply and demand into areas run by the state, in this case education. The 1988 Education Reform Act began marketisation of education by encouraging competition between schools and choice for parents. Marketisation includes funding formulas, exam league tables, cream-skimming and silt shifting. A funding formula is a formula that gives a school the same amount of funds for each pupil. This can affect a working class child's education because if other schools have a higher fund because they are more popular due to better exam results then working class children are unlikely to be able to get a placement at that school so they will be silt-shifted to a less popular school which has lower exam results because of its lack of funding due to its lack of pupils. However, this idea can be criticised because if an unpopular school gets too bad they will be put into special measures by ofsted, this then gives them more funding to try and help improve the school, if this is achieved then their popularity will improve. ...read more.

Middle

Exam league tables rank each school according to its exam performance but it makes no allowance for the level of ability of its pupils. This means that the schools that cream-skim look a lot better compared to the schools that have had all the less able students silt-shifted into their school but in reality the lower achieving schools pupils have probably made a lot more progress through school than in the higher achieving school. Middle class parents also use exam league tables to help choose the better school for their child so they can almost guarantee that their child will achieve more whereas working class parents just want their child to have a placement, even if they did try and go for a better school they are likely to be turned down because the schools will cream-skim to reduce the amount of competition they have. There is competition among schools to attract students; the lower achieving schools have more competition because they have lower exam results meaning they are less popular so they have less funding to pay for better teachers and more facilities so they get lower exam results and so on, but ...read more.

Conclusion

Geoffrey Walford's research on CTCS found that even though they intended to provide vocational education in partnership with employers and to recruit pupils from all social backgrounds, in practice they became just another route to elite education. Middle class parents became attracted to them because they were seen as the next best thing to traditional grammar school. Educational triage is process through which teachers divide students into safe cases, cases suitable for treatment, and hopeless cases and ration resources to focus on those students most likely to improve a school's test scores. This then helps schools achieve higher in their exam results and improving the popularity but in an unpopular school this is hard because they have more cases suitable for treatment and hopeless cases than in a popular school but in the same instance they have less funding to put into those pupils meaning they can't achieve as high. In conclusion it is very clear that marketisation and selection policies produce social class differences in educational achievement through funding formulas, competition, exam league tables, cream-skimming, silt-shifting and educational triage, with most resulting in the middle class child getting a better education than a working class child which then effects their future in regards to higher education and jobs. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Sociological explanations of under achievement.

    can do all these because they are in a more powerful positions and they have formal authority so finally "Hargreaves believes that the order in the classroom is a negotiated order in the classroom is a negotiated order which is based on an agreement between teachers and students" as a

  2. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    Whereas the middle class as pushed toward deferred gratification so they get the highest qualification they can. There are criticisms to how home factors explain differential educational achievement between social classes. One criticism is that there is no clear way to define class, there aren't any objective to meet to be classed as working class or middle.

  1. Examine the Reasons for Differences in Educational Achievement between Different Ethnic Groups

    An ethnocentric curriculum is a school syllabus that has been designed for the dominant culture and forgets the cultures of ethnic minorities. In 1971, Bernard Coard observed the absence of black literature, history and music in the British curriculum, and of positive images of black people in school books.

  2. SOCIAL CLASS DIVISION

    Like other Marxists, Bourdieu argues that the main function of education is to reproduce and legitimate ruling class culture (i.e. cultural reproduction) and power. Another important function of education is to socialise the working-class into a culture of failure so that they take-up, without protest, unrewarding and relatively boring jobs in the factory system.

  1. A discussion of the theory that class-based differences in educational achievement are mainly due ...

    However, his research has been criticised, as he measured parental interest by attendance at open days, and job difference between middle class and working class parents may account for this. These and other finding came to be known as cultural deprivation theory, believing that those at the bottom for the

  2. Examine the ways in which educational policies may reproduce and justify social class inequalities

    Secondary education was made free and the age of leaving school was raised to 15. The idea of the Education Act at first glance seems to successfully overcome the issue of inequalities within education however the introduction of the tripartite system completely wiped this out.

  1. Examine some of the ways that differences in the home background of middle & ...

    This gives them an advantage when it comes to advising their children about the most appropriate subjects and courses to study. Working class parents offer less encouragement and support towards their children's education. The cultural deprivation explanation for working class under-achievement says that working class children are linguistically deprived.

  2. Gender and Educational Attainment

    focused on the importance of making this traditionally male dominated subject more 'girl-friendly'. These initiatives, changes of attitudes and also the fact that teaching methods have been improved to suit the needs of the girls have resulted in the females excelling in all subjects and producing better exam results than the boys.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work