• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'Refugees come to Britain for help, support and most importantly safety. It is wrong of the general public to assume refugees have a negative effect on our society'.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Refugees come to Britain for help, support and most importantly safety. It is wrong of the general public to assume refugees have a negative effect on our society' The above statement claims that Refugees come to Britain for help and safety, and that the way the public condemns them is wrong. Refugees are individuals who leave their home country for one of a number of reasons, although they are usually fleeing a war, persecution or an illegal dictatorship. In this essay, I will present an argument agreeing with the above statement, stating that refugees should be always be allowed into the country and that the public should be proud to be seen as a safe haven for the unfortunate few who flee are forced to flee their home countries. Firstly, Britain is a very rich country, the people of Britain can afford the small amount required to take in these refugees. Britain is one of the worlds richest countries, when you take into account the country's size and comparatively small population, it is easy to see that, on average, the people of Britain are, themselves, very well off. ...read more.

Middle

Another aspect the media exaggerates is the amount of Asylum Seekers that Britain takes in each year. In 2002, 110,700 people tried to gain asylum in Britain. Yes, this is a shockingly high figure, a 20% increase on 2001, however; only around half of these were accepted. Also, in Britain, 110,700 is 1.8 refugees per 1000 British citizens, in Austria, for example, 37,000 Asylum applications were filed in 2002, that is a staggering 4.6 refugees per 1000 Austrian citizens. Put simply, Britain does not take in many refugees. Also many people argue that the screening process for refugees is flawed, and that many who are granted asylum in the country were criminals in their homeland. However, in 2002, 49% of applications for asylum were turned down, 33% of which were down to the background checks carried out by the government. That's 36531 Asylum applications turned down due to the Refugees past. Another argument put forward by those attacking the statement is that the refugees create racial tension in the communities the government places them in. However, again, there is very little evidence of this tension, in many places quite the opposite is seen. ...read more.

Conclusion

People may complain, but they do not realise the poor deal these refugees are receiving, yes, some refugees my manage to struggle up the ladder into a position above the average British person, but those who do are a very, very rare breed. In conclusion, the statement 'Refugees come to Britain for help, support and most importantly safety. It is wrong of the general public to assume refugees have a negative effect on our society' is true, as those who do come to the country are fleeing injustice, yes there must be some who try to abuse the system, fighting to get into the country to reap the benefits of our generous welfare system, but that is true of any system, there will always be a few cheaters who feel the need to abuse it. The negative effect described in the statement seems to be no existent in Britain, there are few cases of refugees causing trouble, on average they commit less crime then the average British citizen, the only negative effect seen is the commotion caused by us Brits when it is announced that the ever present stream of refugees may be directed in our direction. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Word Count: 2,252 Student Number: 032411410. Do the Media Inform or Misinform the Public ...

    So how can it be proposed that the media misinforms the public, when those that produce the media are in fact, the public? It could be said that the media therefore is an opinion, and how can an opinion be misinforming, it is not fact it is merely an interpretation of an event expressed by the public for the public.

  2. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    * Second interview with over 16. Q. What exposure do you have towards the media. Not much I only read the local newspaper. Q. What issues concern you. Immigration, drugs and crime. These are linked as when they come over here they smuggle drugs and start robbing houses for more money.

  1. Censorship is necessary to protect the public

    However, in the past few years, standards have generally seemed to relax. The watershed, a guideline implemented to stop offensive material being broadcast on terrestrial television before 9.00pm, is not as stringent as it once was, with mild bad language and some nudity shown before this time.

  2. To what extent do media representations of refugees and asylum seekers limit their integration ...

    country of their nationality and either unable or, owing to fear, is unwilling to return" (Johnston et al, 2000). When examining the role of the media in inciting racism and xenophobia within society it is important to look at previous work theorising the effects of the media on its audience.

  1. Does violence in the media effect peoples behaviours and opinions?

    What is an interesting finding is that the parents included in this questionnaire stated that the watershed hours are vital in the rearing of their children. Parent's general comments were 'it ensures that when the children are watching TV there is a guarantee will be no explicit material will be shown'.

  2. Explain and Discuss Moral Panics.

    Whilst it remains true that homosexual men are at considerable risk from the virus the media's portrayal of the issue provoked mass public resentment of homosexuals and a general belief that they were responsible for the disease due to their 'unorthodox' lifestyle.

  1. In what ways did the British Government attempt to hide the effect of the ...

    Most propaganda was positive and mostly funny also, to keep spirits high and to show the enemy they were surviving. It was also funny because it was uplifting and not to frighten people. Some propaganda used fear to make people do what the government wanted such as recycling.

  2. Censorship-is it Right or Wrong?

    (certificate 18) The BBFC is fully aware that if a film is given an 18 certificate than some 16 and 17 yr olds will see it and if a 15 certificate is awarded to a film some 14 and 13 yr olds will see it, and certify the films with this in mind.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work