• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Roman Crime and Punishment

Extracts from this document...


Why didn't the Romans Conquer crime? The Romans passed many laws to try and cover every aspect of people's lives. For example... If you deliberately burned down a building you were either bound, whipped, or burnt at the stake, but if it was an accident you had to repair the damage. Another law was that householders had to keep their door fronts clean otherwise they would be prosecuted by the City officials. You had to sell goods at a suitable weight and if you took someone to the Magistrates Court they would have to go and the only way they could refuse was if the person summoning them was of a lower standard to them. The Romans mainly tried to stop crime by using harsh punishments as a deterrent. For example if you were in the legionaries and one man ran away in battle faced decimation (One in every ten legions were chosen randomly and executed). Another harsh and gruesome punishment was that if you had committed a very serious crime such as murder then you were sentenced to death to fight in the coliseum as Gladiators. ...read more.


The Third types of officials were the Urban Cohorts: Their main job was to keep order and to stop riots. The fourth types of Officials were Called Vigiles: They were fire- fighters who helped patrol the city. If you were a victim of Crime you either had to chase the criminal away or if you knew who had committed the crime you could take them to court. This was difficult for the victim because they had to look for evidence themselves and had to arrange for the court and lawyer etc. The Main Causes of Crime in the Roman Empire were. Rome was a very crowded city this made pick-pocketing, fights, murders and other theft very easy. One major reason of why crime started and carried on through the years was because of the Government. The Government did not see that it was their problem to deal with minor crimes so these minor crimes carried on. Another cause of Crime was that there was an extreme amount of poor people in Rome so the only way they could survive was to steal of murder and there were extreme food shortages. ...read more.


The Senate were the Emperor's advisers and one member said that "All it takes is one bad harvest to cause a catastrophe of crime" This shows that the senate was scared that either a riot would break out or there would be revolt just like the one that Spartacus had lead against the Roman Empire. Some aspects of Roman Justice were useful such as the Magistrates courts and that you were innocent until proven guilty. On the other hand some aspects were not effective such as chasing down your offender by yourself and not having a police force because that means that Rome would one day corrupt with crime and no one will be able to stop it. Roman Crime and Punishment is similar to Britain's in very few ways for example in Rome they Take minor crimes very seriously and can be taken to court, Britain is the same. In Britain the Laws are written down and they are in Rome. Roman Punishments are very different to Britain's Punishments because Britain's punishments are not as harsh and are thought over carefully. By Reetica Sharma 10W ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Free essay

    local trends in crime in Britain

    Evidence suggests that public confidence in the police has declined, especially amongst ethnic minorities. Most crimes are solved from the result of information from victims. If trust breaks down, the flow of vital information ceases and the level of solved crimes diminishes.

  2. Assess the Strengths and Weaknesses of the Different Aims of Punishment

    He listed a set of ethical norms of criminal justice by which our system should be evaluated. Consistence and coherence with realities. Benevolent good will and respect towards all person. Equal rights for all persons. Presumption of innocence. Special care to protect poor, weak and unpopular from unfair treatment.

  1. Crime And Punishment

    Since the vast majority of crimes people hear and see in the news are violent and heinous, they assume that there is a crime problem and that something must be done to stop it. The statistics that the media enjoys to misinterpret and report misleadingly is primarily taken from the uniform crime report.

  2. What is the Function of Punishment?

    Our sole concern should be to enforce the law. The problem with Mabbott's argument is that it is open to the same kind of criticism levied against the utilitarian i.e.

  1. The Evolution of Punishment.

    incarceration, or imprisonment properly so-called, came into existence, being regarded as a genuine punishment'10. It was shown that in the eighteenth century prison was established and recognised fully. When Durkheim distinguished between the religious criminality and the human criminality he was trying to show that as humans we tend to

  2. Explain and analyse the Reasons for Punishment.

    Deterrence is the theory advanced by those who believe that severe punishment on several example offenders can serve to deter those who may have been tempted to offend by the severity of the punishment they will receive. Long prison sentences, extreme deprivation of liberty and, in the United States, the death penalty, are used to shock people into not offending.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work