• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

secondary sources of data

Extracts from this document...


'With the exception of official statistics, most forms of secondary data are too subjective to be useful in sociological research.' Explain and assess this view. [25] Secondary data refers to preexisting data that has been produced by someone other than the sociologist involved in the research. Official statistics include data produced by the government or other agencies e.g. trade unions. Other forms of secondary data include life documents or historical documents such as diaries, letters, and suicide notes etc. They are certain cases when there are no alternatives to secondary data - in the case of 'before' and 'after' studies or studies conducted to analyze trends over a long period of time one cannot go back in time and therefore needs to rely on existing data. Official statistics refers to data collected by the government e.g. statistics relating to unemployment. The fact that statistics are already available to the sociologists means that the sociologist does not have to spend time or money collecting his/her own data. The data allows comparisons to be made, which the researcher would find difficult to collect personally such as in the case of cross cultural studies e.g. ...read more.


Interationists for that reason consider official statistics socially constructed. Marxists would consider official statistics as a tool of the ruling class to justify the status quo in the capital system. Also, to what extent can official statistics be regarded as representative? They provide merely a 'snapshot' of reality which no indications as to people's meanings. For example, statistics can provide us with the number dropouts from school but the question remains as to why these dropouts occurred. Interpretivists would argue that although statistics are useful they should be utilized in a different manner and one should completely rely on them as a source of data. They would place more emphasis on the uncovering the views of the people who made them. They tend to favor data sources, which could be seen as important for allowing 'verstehen' a German word, which means the understanding of human activity. Interpretivists consider life documents useful in revealing personal meanings, which they see as shaping behavior. Life documents are a secondary source that involve the expression of feelings e.g. diaries, letters, emails and blogs. ...read more.


However, this may be difficult, as certain documents may have deteriorated over time. Also, asking four key questions should assess the reliability and validity of any historical document - How authentic it is? Does it have credibility? Is the document representative? And do we share the author's interpretations? Mass media reports such as newspapers etc may also be used as a secondary source of data but these too are often 'too subjective' as they largely reflect the views of journalists or those who created them. They have also been criticized for distorting images of society. All in all, official statistics are useful, however, they are often questioned in terms of validity. It could be argued that it would be a better use of the sociologist's time to not completely rely on official statistic but perhaps to use them in comparison with the findings of primary data. For instance is the trend uncovered by primary research typical of the wider society? In the case of say, demographics, official statistics are vital however, other secondary sources can provide data more an insight into people's subjective states. Perhaps a combination (known as methodological pluralism) can be used to balance out the research in terms of objectivity and subjectivity. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Overall this is a good essay that covers reliability, representation and validity and some good key studies. There is both advantages and disadvantages but a little more on the advantage side would balance up the essay. Also, a little more focus and explanation of subjectivity is required. Overall: ****

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 09/03/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the usefulness of feminist contributions to our understanding of society today

    4 star(s)

    argues that this is because Marxism is 'sex-blind'. Dual systems feminists regard patriarchy and capitalism as intertwined, though sometimes in conflict. Hartmann sees capitalism and patriarchy as two intertwined systems that form a single entity, 'patriarchal capitalism'. Difference and poststructuralist feminists argue that other feminist theories are essentialist and disregard differences between women.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Outline and assess Functionalist explanations of the role of the education system.

    4 star(s)

    Working together with the principle of meritocracy, functionalists see the education system as an institution which provides the members of society with the benefit of working hard to achieve in life. Davis and Moore see the existence of a hierarchical qualification system as positive, - providing employers with the ability

  1. Autobiography - I am going to write about the first day at secondary school.

    But when I got to my class we were put in a seating plan, which was ok, as I was sitting to a girl who was nice. But we had to stars doing some work, and I realised that I had forgotten my pencil case and my teacher had to

  2. The education system is meritocratic

    the poor should accept their poverty as it's their fault as they didn't try hard enough or they messed around. The myth of meritocracy is spoken about by Bowles and Gintis they said that school did allocate students into jobs but said this was not a positive concept but a

  1. What it Means to be Canadian.

    This new nationality created from the blended backgrounds is Canadian. In other countries a lot of people don't accept ethnic minorities.

  2. Assess the strengths and weaknesses of interviews, as a research method

    The interviewer can gain a true and genuine picture into what something is really like, as semi-structured interviews allows the researcher to get close to the truth by asking a variety of their own questions. On the other hand, it may be hard to produce a replica of this interview because the interviewer focuses on their own questions.

  1. Is sociology a science?

    This supports the idea that sociology is not scientific as objective methods cannot be used to study the individual's behaviour which is what gives structure to society.

  2. Can and should sociology be a science?

    the world, therefore sociology can be a science as it studies social facts. Positivism aims at discovering patterned and regular events in the social world whose occurrence is either caused by another event, or correlated. Therefore sociology can be a science as correlation and causation can be established in sociology

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work