• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month
  1. 1
  2. 2
  3. 3
  4. 4
  5. 5
  6. 6
  7. 7
  8. 8
  9. 9
  10. 10
  11. 11
  12. 12
  13. 13
  14. 14
  15. 15
  16. 16

Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

Extracts from this document...


CRIME AND DEVIANCE DEFINING DEVIANCE Sociologists define deviance as behaviour that is recognised as violating expected rules and norms. Deviance is more than simple non-conformity; it is behaviour that departs significantly from social expectations. In the sociological perspective on deviance, there is subtlety that distinguishes it from commonsense understandings of the same behaviour. * The sociological definition of deviance stresses social context, not individual behaviour. Sociologists see deviance in terms of group processes, definitions and judgements, not just as unusual individual acts. * The sociological definition of deviance recognises that not all behaviours are judged similarly as all groups. What is deviant to one group may be normative (non-deviant) to another. Understanding what society sees as deviant also requires understanding the context that determines who has the power to judge some behaviours as deviant and others not. * The sociological definition of deviance recognises that established rules and norms are socially created, not just morally decreed or individually imposed. Sociologists emphasise that deviance lies not just in behaviour itself, but also in the social responses of groups to the behaviour. Sociologists distinguish between two types of deviance: formal and informal. Formal deviance is behaviour that breaks laws or official rules. Crime is an example. There are formal sanctions against formal deviance, such as imprisonment and fines. Informal deviance is behaviour that violates customary norms. Although such deviance may not be specified in law, it is judged to be deviant by those who uphold the society's norms. An example is the body piercing that is popular among young people. No laws prohibit this practice, yet it violates common norms about dress and appearance and is judged by many to be socially deviant even though it is fashionable for others. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance Functionalism Recalling that functionalism is a theoretical perspective that interprets all parts of society, including those that may seem dysfunctional, as contributing to the stability and continuance of the whole. ...read more.


LABELLING THEORY Labelling theory interprets the responses of others as the most significant factor in understanding how deviant behaviour is both created and sustained. This theory stems from the work of W.I. Thomas, who wrote, "If men define situations as real, they are real in their consequences'. Labelling is the assignment or attachment of a deviant identity to a person by others, including by agents of social institutions. Therefore, the people's reaction, not the action itself, produces deviance as a result of the labelling process. Once applied, the deviant label is difficult to shed. Linked with conflict theory, labelling theory shows how those with the power to label someone deviant and to impose sanctions wield great power in determining deviance. When police, court officials, school authorities, experts of various sorts, teachers, and official agents of social institutions apply a label, it sticks. Furthermore, because deviants are handled through complex organisations, bureaucratic workers "process" people according to rules and procedures, seldom questioning the basis for those rules or willing or able to challenge them. Bureaucrats are unlikely to linger over whether someone labelled deviant deserves that label, even though they use their judgements and discretion in deciding whether to apply the label. This leaves tremendous room for all kinds of social influence and prejudice to enter the decision of whether someone is considered deviant. Once the label of deviant is applied, it is difficult for the deviant to recover a non-deviant identity. Once a social worker or psychiatrist labels a client mentally ill, that person will be treated as mentally ill, regardless of his or her mental state. Pleas by the accused that he or she is mentally sound are typically taken as more evidence of the illness. A person's anger and frustration about the label are taken as further support for the diagnosis. A person need not have engaged in deviant behaviour to be labelled deviant. ...read more.


However Young sees these policies as nostalgic and doomed attempts to recreate the golden age in the 50s. Young criticises the record of governments including new labour. He argues they have largely only addressed the symptoms such as anti social behaviour; they have been tougher on tackling crime than crimes underlying issues such as inequality. Left realism has succeeded in drawing attention to the reality of street crime and its effects on victims of deprived groups. However it has been criticised. Henry and Milovanovic (1996) argue that it accepts the authority's definition of street crime being committed by the poor instead of defining the problem as being one of how powerful groups do harm to the poor. Marxists argue it fails to explain corporate crimes which is more harmful even if less conspicuous. Interactionists argue that because left realists rely on quantitative data from victim surveys they cannot explain offenders motives. Instead we need qualitative data to reveal their meanings. Their use of sub cultural theory means left realists assume that value consensus exists and that crime only occurs when this breaks down. Relative deprivation cannot fully explain crime because not all those who experience it commit crime. The theory over predicts the amount of crime. Its focus on high crime inner city areas gives it an unrepresentative view and makes crime appear a greater problem then it is. There are both similarities and differences between the two types of realism. For example both left and right realists see crime as a real problem and fear of crime as rational. On the other hand they come from different ends of the political spectrum; right realists are neo conservative while left realists are reformist socialists. It's reflected in how they explain crime; right realists blame individual lack of self control while left realists blame structural inequalities and relative deprivation. Likewise political differences are reflected in their aims and solutions to the problem of crime; the right prioritise social order achieved through a tough stance of offenders while the left prioritise justice achieved through democratic policing and reforms to create greater equality. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Assess the Usefulness of Official Crime Statistics to a Sociological Understanding of Crime

    4 star(s)

    This victimization of ethnic minorities through police discrimination and racism is an important element in the assessment of official statistics. This can be seen from figures issued by the Home Office in June 2000 where there was an over representation of ethnic minorities in prisons in Britain and where 19%

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Evaluate the Functionalist explanations of Deviance.

    4 star(s)

    This is much like the primary socialisation given to a child by the family. When a child breaks the boundaries of what is acceptable, they are punished. 2. Changing values - every so often, when a person is taken to court and charged with a crime, a degree of sympathy arises for that person.

  1. Evaluate subcultural explanations for crime and deviance

    This was seen to be done in order to gain status in this subcultural group and a way of fighting against an unequal social system branding them as failures because of their class. This has been criticised by Cloward and Ohlin because of Cohen's failure to explain the variety of subcultural forms that emerge out of the social structure.

  2. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    Therefore the generating of rules is the cause for crime and deviance. He says that deviance is not a distinctive form of behaviour but behaviour which breaks these certain outlined rules. Becker presents well the idea that in some contexts certain behaviour is seen as deviant whereas in others it is not.

  1. Assess the view that ethnic differences in crime rates are the result of the ...

    Like most of the other main stages of the process of the justice system, the majority of the population in prison are members of the ethnic minority community. In 2007 Blacks held 15% of the population, Asians held 7%. We can also note that the existences of similar patterns in others countries.

  2. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    A situation where the subject may not have acted deviant to the extent of being a criminal could be labelled criminal by other persons. The false labelling could invoke the criminal behaviour, therefore transforming them into a criminal. The false assumption to start with, actually becomes true in the end.

  1. Assess sociological explanations of social class differences in crime rates

    that they do, things like selective enforcement, stereotyping and class bias from the police forces may unfairly affect the statistics, giving a warped view of the criminology of the working class.

  2. Assess the usefulness of functionalist theories in explaining crime and deviance

    Merton had a different theory to Durkheim. This is called the strain theory. He focused on the ?American Dream? where money and wealth is a measure of success. He found that people had to have money to be seen as successful and if they couldn?t get their money by legal

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work