• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sociologists who have studied the role of religion in society, and perhaps more specifically Functionalists and traditional Marxists often tend to adopt the view that religion is a conservative force.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

a) Assess the extent to which religion can be seen as a conservative influence. Sociologists who have studied the role of religion in society, and perhaps more specifically Functionalists and traditional Marxists often tend to adopt the view that religion is a conservative force, 'conservative' meaning that it favours keeping things the way they are and inhibiting change. Restraining change can be seen as a force for stability and social order, and is thus reflected in the majority of conservative thinkers. Functionalists believe that society's religious basic shared beliefs, values, traditions and norms that make the society run smoothly through group worship and celebration serves to create cohesion and group solidarity. In maintaining this social solidarity, religion acts as a conservative force because if or when it fails to perform this function, new ideas may emerge that effectively become the new religion. Durkheim (1912) regarded 'new religions' such as nationalism and communism as taking over from Christianity, but still performing the same essential functions. Functionalists are therefore saying that religion in its form changes, but what remains unchanged is its function. Religion for them carry out key roles in society such as socialisation to society's members especially the children into a value consensus by investing values with a ...read more.

Middle

This conservative force is reflected in religion's function of reproducing, maintaining and justifying class inequality, according to Marx. Religion serves to reflect ruling class ideology and prevents the working class from questioning the true nature of their exploitation by the ruling class and doing anything about it, almost seeing it as 'God's will' and passively accepting things as they are, hence keeping order and preventing social change. Religion, in the view of the Marx, legitimatise social inequality by controlling the classes and promoting the idea that the existing hierarchy is natural, god-given and thus, unchangeable. 'God made them, high or lowly, and order'd their estate.' Religion also disguises the true nature of exploitation by explaining social inequalities in supernatural terms and distorting the real causes (unequal treatment by the bourgoisie) as the product of sin or a sign that people have been chosen by God. Religion can again be seen as limiting change by keeping the working classes passive and resigning to their fate. Some religions present suffering as normal, and suggesting that those who do not question their situation will be rewarded by a place in heaven, promoting the idea that there is no point in changing society now and so preventing the working class from actually doing ...read more.

Conclusion

Religion is used to support dominant groups in America. Item A. claims that modern Protestant fundamentalists religions in the US support traditional right-wing, conservative and anticommunist values. Christian Right groups often suggest that their Christian political positions are, or ought to be, the views of all Christians. Many elements of the Christian Right, like item A states, sympathise with and sometimes influence the US Republican Party (an extremely conservative party). Fundamentalist groups like these want to return to traditional values and practices and therefore have many strong opinions on modern society's 'new ideas'. Many groups have strong opposition to abortion, gay rights movement and pornography but support the presence of Christianity, traditional family values and the teaching of creationism. All of which are extremely conservative ideas and subsequently supporting the claim that religion restricts social change and so are upholding a conservative influence. However, in reality, American Christians hold a wide variety of political views and are not all conservative in their party loyalties. To conclude, both functionalist and Marxists approaches, suggest that religion generally plays a conservative role in society- preventing change and supporting the existing social order. Nevertheless, there is always an alternative position, for example the Neo-Marxist perspective, that it is possible for religion to change societies. ?? ?? ?? ?? Francesca Cifaldi ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Peer reviewed

    Evaluate the Contribution Marxists Have made in Understanding the Role religion plays in Society

    3 star(s)

    Functionalist recognizes the good religion does for society. In Parsons Study on Totemism (Elementary Forms of Religious Life) he illustrated how religion can give members of a society a sense of identity and belonging. The totem in which Australian aborigines worshipped symbolically represented the group itself.

  2. Free essay

    Is religion a conservative force or a force for social change?

    Feminists argue that religion has been used to maintain traditional beliefs and customs in an extreme way when it is linked to fundamentalism. An example of these extreme beliefs can be seen in Afghanistan - where many Muslim women have to undergo female circumcision as part of the traditional values and beliefs.

  1. Assess the view that cults, sects and new age movement are fringe organisations that ...

    New age movements reflect these concerns as a self help religion about self discovery and personal choice. This means many people are looking to a new age movement for answers instead of influences in society. Secondly traditional norms and values are breaking down. Post modern society is characterised by relativism.

  2. Secularisation. Bryan Wilson said all societies would eventually lose their religion, a vague statement ...

    Critics of this would say that this doesn't show us anything about secularisation. It shows us what his own thoughts on religion are and his ideas of what a church should teach. This tells us more about Herberg than it religion, so the research isn't valid.

  1. What Would Functionalists Say About Health e.g. the Sick Role? ...

    * Medicine has become increasingly specialised and hierarchical. * Medicine now has an extensive wage-labour force (including employees in the pharmaceutical industry and related industrial sectors). * Medical practitioners have become proletarianised, that is, their professional status has gradually

  2. Assess the extent to which religion produces social change. Many sociologists such as functionalists ...

    Overall functionalists opinion is that instead of religion being a radical change, it is conservative and keeps society remaining the same. However people would criticise functionalists views by saying that church attendance is declining in the UK, so it's difficult to see how religion can be functioning to socialise members, so therefore its promoting change.

  1. This essay will evaluate three groups within society; the Feminists, Postmodernists and the Marxists, ...

    behaviour patterns of someone with a stomach bug or a broken bone are clear and expected, a chronic long term condition changes these set behaviours and expectations (Long-Crowell, 2016). This raises the questions, how sick is the person? And, how should they be acting?

  2. Assess the view that religious beliefs and practices are changing to reflect a new ...

    Stark and Bainbridge argue that religion thrives in the USA because there?s never been a religious monopoly there but this differs in Europe. Therefore they conclude that the main factor influencing the level of religious participation isn?t the demand for religion like the secularisation theory suggests but the supply.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work