• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Sociology cannot and should not be a science To what extent do sociological arguments and evidence support this view?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

'Sociology cannot and should not be a science' To what extent do sociological arguments and evidence support this view? (33 marks) According to the Oxford Dictionary, science is defined as: the intellectual and practical activity encompassing the systematic study of the structure and behaviour of the physical and natural world through observation and experiment. By following this definition it could be conceived that sociology can be considered as a scientific discipline. Positivist and interpretivism are the two main theoretical arguments with regard to this issue. The theory of positivism is based on the idea that sociology should be based upon the guidelines of the natural sciences. Whereas the theory of interpretivism would bring about the argument that the knowledge is based on people's interpretations. People's personal opinions would also affect whether they believe that sociological theory can be regarded as a scientific theory as subjects such as psychology and sociology are often regarded as 'people sciences' because they appear to follow some basic guidelines. Positivists would argue that the methods of the natural sciences are applicable to the study of people within society, and that it will help solve social problems and achieve progress by applying these methods in the same manner as a scientific theory or experiment. ...read more.

Middle

Interpretivists do not see sociology as a scientific theory as science deals with laws of cause and effect, whereas sociology would appear to deal with people's meanings, rejecting the use of casual explanations and scientific methods. When it comes to conducting research interpretivists are more likely to use qualitative data such as personal documents and analysis. For example when the issue of suicide arises, they would require evidence of a suicide note. However, positivists prefer to use quantitative data, such as official statics. So when suicide is considered it cannot be defined as a social fact because people attach their own meanings to make sense of it, which is internal to their consciousness. Because of this social factors may not be applicable to a person's death, as the deceased will have their own personal reasons for the taking of their own life. Overall interpretivists see sociological theory as a purpose to uncover people's meanings, by seeing the world through another viewpoint. However, positivists see natural sciences as verificationalism applied to the study of observable patterns, and they feel that sociology should follow its methods. Again, not everyone accepts this view, producing three major challenges to it. The first is Karl Popper's theory of how Science Grows. ...read more.

Conclusion

Both natural and social sciences attempt to explain the causes of events in terms of hidden features by observing their effects. For example, social class is not something we can directly see, but its effect on things such as life chances can be observed. On the other hand, realists see little difference between natural and social sciences, except that natural sciences are able to study closed systems in lab experiments. Overall, whether sociology is a science or not can be argued either way, but it would appear that there is more sociological evidence to suggest that sociology cannot and should not be a science. Scientific methods are not necessarily applicable to most areas of sociological study, and direct casual explanations cannot be made where individual people are involved, especially for things such as suicide where things are too personal to conduct a valid study. Scientific methods can be used in sociology, but are used differently, as meanings have to be attached to the study of people, as people make their own decisions based on the opinion or meaning they attach to a situation. Also, there are multiple sociological theories; there is no unified sociological definition or idea. Therefore, it is impossible for sociology to be considered a science. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Examine the weakness of different types of documents used in a sociological research. Examine ...

    4 star(s)

    Taking that into account, there are two different perspectives on the choice of research methods. This is positivism and interpretivism. Positivist and interpretivist collect and use different types of data. Positivsit prefer quantitative, whilst interpretivist prefer qualitative data, because they make different propositions about the nature of society and how we should examine.

  2. Can and should sociology be a science?

    the world, therefore sociology can be a science as it studies social facts. Positivism aims at discovering patterned and regular events in the social world whose occurrence is either caused by another event, or correlated. Therefore sociology can be a science as correlation and causation can be established in sociology

  1. Sociological theories and Healthcare.

    The theory outlines two rights of a sick person and two obligations. Obligations are what the sick person must do whereas rights are what the sick person is entitled to. Listed below are the rights and obligations a sick person must follow: > Rights: * The sick person is not

  2. Can and should sociology be science?

    For example, the study of suicide conducted by Emile Durkheim. By analyzing suicide statistics, Durkheim found causal and correlation relationship between external social forces with suicide, as in fact the law governing suicide rate. His studies show that suicide rate rises during economic booms or slumps as they brought the

  1. Compare and contrast two sociological theories

    Because others have felt it was necessary and acted on that thought with an ordinance for recycling bin placement, you are now influenced by their actions. Marxism offers a different means of creating change, conflict and revolution. The lower class must band together and fight the upper class if they want equal rights and suitable working conditions.

  2. Compare and contrast any two major theoretical perspectives in Sociology.

    Functionalists use the organic analogy to explain both change and social structure were change occurs through a gradual process as society develops, it organically adjusts and adapts naturally to change.

  1. Assess the view that sociology can and should model itself on the natural sciences

    Interpretivists argue that the matter of sociology is meaningful social actions and we can only understand it by successfully interpreting the meanings and motives of the persons involved. In their view, sociology is not a science, because science only deals with laws of cause and effect, and not human meanings.

  2. Religion can be both a conservative force and an initiator of social change to ...

    Femonists also argue that religion is a conservative force and it?s a patriarchal institution which functions to oppress females and maintain the power of males in society. For example the priests are predominantly males and in some churches females are separated/ required to sit at the back of the church.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work