• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Studies of the effectiveness of punishments often use reconviction rates as a measurement of success or failure. According to fairly recent reports there are currently no real differences between reconviction rates for custodial and all community penalti

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

INTRODUCTION Studies of the effectiveness of punishments often use reconviction rates as a measurement of success or failure. According to fairly recent reports there are currently no real differences between reconviction rates for custodial and all community penalties (Home Affairs Committee, 1998, Home Office, 1998). However, there are many problems associated with the reliability of such data, and much caution is needed when using such measurements as a criteria for assessing the effectiveness of punishment. For instance, there is much disagreement about what reconviction should be counted. For community penalties the counting began on the date of sentence whereas for custodial sentences the counting begins on the date of release (May, 1994). therefore, does not take into account any offence committed whilst in prison. On the other hand, there is no way of knowing how far re-offending whilst serving a community sentence is due to the ineffectiveness of the punishment or an individuals social circumstance. The 1998 report by the Home Affairs Committee draws attention to even more concerns regarding reconviction rates. It is stated that: "Reconviction rates take any subsequent reconviction as an indication of failure and do not take into account changes in offence severity or a reduction in the frequency of offending; Reconviction rates under-estimate the true level of re-offending since for many types of offence the clear up rate is very low; Police Forces have varying clear up rates which reflect differences in the changes of being arrested and re-convicted " ( : XV-XV1). ...read more.

Middle

In the case of 'dangerous offenders' imprisonment is the most effective form of punishment in order to protect the general public. The problem with 'dangerous offenders' is that grave violent offences are rare occurrences and are very difficult to predict (Dunbar and Langdon, 1998). The fact is, the vast majority of prisoners are not convicted of violent offences. Of the 60,000 people sentenced to immediate custody on 1995, 76% were convicted of non-violent offences. Of the 84,000 people who received prison sentences in 1996, 20,157 were convicted for non-payment of fines (Wilson and Ashton, 1998). The question is, what should be done with persistent non-violent property offenders who constantly re-offend? The introduction of electronic tagging and probation orders with a requirement of residence in a hostel allows those offenders to be dealt with in the community while still offering significant protection to the public (Home Affairs Committee, 1998). These types of offenders are released from prison at some point and at present would not receive the same volume of rehabilitation provision that they would within a community sentence. Therefore in the long run community punishment could provide more effective protection from non-violent persistent offenders (Home Affairs Committee, 1998) COST The total annual cost of the prison service to the taxpayers is around �1.8 million, and each new prison costs an average �90 million to build (Wilson and Ashton, 1998). The annual cost per prisoner place is about �25,000. ...read more.

Conclusion

CONCLUSION Prisons are made such problematic places by there extreme overcrowded conditions and the wide range of offenders they have to control, care for, and contain against their will. Because of these extreme conditions prisons are less effective than community sanctions in terms of rehabilitation and cost effectiveness. Unless offenders are violent offenders or worse, they should not be sent to prison to be rehabilitated but given a community sentence. Worrall (1997) asserts that: - "There needs to be a consensus that prison can never be a genuine site of rehabilitation and that some attempts must be made to keep those criminals deemed capable of being rehabilitated out of prison" (:27). Imprisonment can offer immediate protection to the general public, however, nearly all prisoners are released at some point, and at present, will rarely have to confront their offending behaviour in order to be rehabilitated to the same extent as those who are subjected to community sanctions (Home Affairs Committee, 1998). With the provision of electronic tagging and probation orders with a required residence in a hostel, community sanctions can be just has effective in protecting the public against non-violent offenders has a prison sentence. And In the long run, maybe more so. Prison should be reserved as a punishment for the most serious offences. Prison is still accepted by many has a necessary, if not an altogether desirable 'social institution'. And for sometime yet, large numbers of offenders will be kept in them. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Examine the differences between Muslims living in the UK and Muslims living in Saudi ...

    hand they are singing Christian hymns and when they come back from school their parents will send them to the mosque to learn the Quran. Another widespread problem is that of lunchtime at primary schools. The Muslim youth are not permitted to eat the food that is provided by the school due to the fact that it might be unlawful.

  2. Punishment and Prisons. This essay shall describe the changes in the methods of punishment ...

    became more popular. Noel Smith explained that this was because cannabis stays in the system and can be detected for up to nearly two months after use, whilst heroin passes through the body much quicker. Therefore it is difficult to decipher whether drug testing actually worked; if those using heroin were tested but

  1. Describe and Evaluate the Use of Victim Surveys as a Measurement of Criminal Activity

    terrace house They often go out The risk factors for repeated victims of violence 25-44 year old female Living in rented accommodation Single parents As mentioned above that females are more likely to be a victim of violence, the worst kind of violence that they suffer is domestic violence.

  2. Discuss the effectiveness of the Prison system, and its purpose in relation to its ...

    those without a job are confined to their cells for most of the day. Prisoners are entitled to 30 minutes of supervised exercise a day (when the weather is good), and often in the evenings allowed time for association, when they are allowed out of their cells to watch television,

  1. Inequalities within the 'Criminal JUSTICE System/Process'

    But in specific areas eg Dudley, they had a 23% chance of receiving a custodial sentence. Higher proportions of Black (42%) and Asian (43%) offenders were sentenced without a social inquiry report being available (a way to mitigate on behalf of the offender), compared to whites (28%).

  2. Which is more effective - punishment by imprisonment or with in the community?

    Prison provides absolute protection from an individual only for the duration of the sentence. This will not always mean protection from crime. It was suggested to the Home Affairs Select Committee in 1998 that demands for drugs from people inside prison results in crime outside.

  1. A Failing Justice System

    In fact, the probability of being a victim of a crime is only 0.26% (Demirbas 37). However, absolute majority of people see crime as the most important problem (Picca 67). For instance, 57.4% of Texas citizens, 29.8% of Uri people and 48.5% of Zurich residents have a prognosis that they will be victims (Demirbas 38).

  2. 'Crime is both deterred and prevented by the use of imprisonment.' Discuss

    of freedom, they were to be rehabilitated and reformed to be able to resist the temptation to re-offend and to live good honest lives upon release. Revisionists held more radical views in that they saw correctional institutions as repressive forms of social control, born from class conflict and to protect the vested interests of the wealthy and the governing class.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work