Citizenship Coursework

Teenage Curfews

The issue that I am studying and what both the articles are studying is the matter of teenage curfews.

I am going to look at two articles to see what the press and newspapers, from different sides of the political spectrum, have to say about the concern of teenage curfews.

There are arguments for and against, depending on what article it is.  The main arguments for teenage curfews are that teenage “yobbery” and “hooliganism” have been increasing; whereas the main argument against teenage curfews is that it is “breaching young people’s rights”.

The two articles are from the Guardian and the Daily Mail.  The Guardian has the title “Teenage Curfews Criticised” this article has a balanced view with points for and against the use of teenage curfews.  Whereas the Daily Mail’s title is “Blair Blitz on Yobs” this article is a lot more biased and has loads of points for the curfew but none against it.

The Guardian, on the left wing of the political spectrum, is a fair, balanced article with points and views for and against the installation of a teenage curfew.  Many people have been interviewed in this article.  The first is Chris Stanley, spokesman on youth crime for the crime reduction charity NACRO said “These powers could well up end becoming the Dangerous Dogs Act of the juvenile justice system, popular with no one and virtually impossible to enforce” this is a point against the use of teenage curfews “Enforcement could prove to be a nightmare, with tension and conflict between young people and the police increasing, not diminishing, as a result”.  He later added “I pity the police officer who has to spend his or her evenings working out which teenagers are under 16 and which are over 16” what Mr Stanley is on about is that if the bill did become an act then the police would find it almost impossible to enforce, this could also mean that while a policeman was checking a bunch of teenagers for their age, there could be someone older further on down the road who is robbing a shop or vandalising something.

Join now!

Beverly Hughes a junior home office minister has a different view though, “extending the age range of the curfews would mean the authorities could better protect communities and the young people themselves.  These orders are not designed to be used in isolation, but are another tool that police and local authorities can use to tackle antisocial behaviour” she said.  Her point of view shows us that she is for the use of teenage curfews.  She added that they would also better equip officers to “protect children from the risks of being unaccompanied on the streets on the streets at night ...

This is a preview of the whole essay