• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The chivalry thesis claims that women will be treated more leniently for committing certain crimes, generally shoplifting is often associated more with females than males, but the statistics suggest that males commit many more acts of theft than women, an

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the value of 'chivalry thesis 'in understanding differences in crime. gfg Pollak (1950) was of the opinion that police and magistrates tended to be more 'chivalrous' and 'lenient' towards female offenders, resulting in sentence disparities, and as a result, criminal statistics underestimate the amount of female offending. (Item A). Pollak (1961) argued that men - namely in this case police officers, magistrates and judges, are socialised to be protective towards women and thus are less likely to chare or prosecute them, and are also treated more leniently in court. Pollak goes further to argue that women are accustomed to deceiving men, for example in faking orgasms during sex, or lying in a relationship to gain material wealth. This skill in deceit mean that their crimes, such as poisoning and infanticide, are less easily uncovered (item A) leading to women being underrepresented in criminal statistics. The chivalry thesis claims that women will be treated more leniently for committing certain crimes, generally shoplifting is often associated more with females than males, but the statistics suggest that males commit many more acts of theft than women, and this may be because females are let off with a warning rather than a conviction. ...read more.

Middle

Although these findings may not show the severity of the specific offences. Campbell through self report studies in 1976, of urban schoolgirls, compared to 16 year old males, these sources showed that 1.33 offences were committed by males for every 1.0 for females, this hugely contrasted to 1976 official figures on convictions, which showed 8.95 convictions for every female 1.0. This shows how official statistics can be greatly misleading, that although males may convict more crime, the gulf between the amount of offences shown by statistics, and popular opinion, is not as wide as it seems. Although these studies do give evidence towards the chivalry thesis, the bulk of research does not give this indication. Steven box 1981, reviewed data from self report studies in UK and USA, and concluded that 'the weight of evidence on women committing serious offences does not give clear support to the view that they receive differential and more favourable treatment from members of the public, police or judges'. Although it has to always be remembered that in a self report study, the validity and reliability relies upon the respondent's ability and willingness to tell the truth, which is not always apparent. ...read more.

Conclusion

Frances Hiedensohn 1985 slated the theory greatly, stating that is was based on analysis that had very little evidence and many unsupported assumptions, she regarded it as being based upon an unsubstantiated stereotypical image of women. In conclusion, although some parts of Pollak's chivalry thesis, namely the parts saying women are naturally more likely to conceal crime are quite unsupported and base, studies associated with the theory have hinted that women are often in some cases treated more leniently by the criminal justice system. Although the extent of this cannot really be measured, statistics would have us believe that the gap between male and female criminality is huge, but upon closer investigation this is not the case. Reasons for this may be that criminology and sociology is largely dominated by males that the research is done on males by males, leading to an underrepresentation on female crime, or that perhaps female crimes are comparatively seen as trivial and are not deemed worthy of research. Whichever way it is looked it, there is a case for the argument that females are often not treated as harshly as males upon committing crime, but of course the opposite argument could be valid also. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Here's what a teacher thought of this essay

4 star(s)

Overall this is a really strong essay. The content never drifts from the focus of the question, there is a good even debate on both sides of the discussion and the use of the item has been applied well. The studies applied are also very effective and support the evidence throughout. At times there is opportunity to apply key terms such as iceberg theory or the hidden figure of crime.

Marked by teacher Matthew Wilkin 04/04/2013

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Social control agents are those who regulate and administer the response to deviance, such as the police and mental health workers. Members of powerless groups may be defined as deviant for even the slightest infraction against social norms, whereas others may be free to behave in deviant ways without consequence.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    For example, utilitarian crime occurs in all three subcultures. Miller didn't see juvenile delinquency as being rooted in the rejection of the middle-class value system, as did other subculture theorists, but in the value system of the lower class. It is this value system that generates delinquent acts. He believes that this lower class group has for centuries possessed

  1. Sociological explanations for patterns of female crime

    by brining women onto the agenda and by demonstrating how women have been ignored in research, there will be greater understanding of female deviance. In particular, new theories can be developed that will cover both males and females.

  2. "An eye for an eye, a tooth for a tooth". How far would you ...

    Likewise, heavy but fair punishment meted out to these criminals would also exemplify the fairness of the government in maintaining law and order, so much so that it would be enough to deter would-be lawbreakers. Even if capital punishment were to be necessary to highlight this, it will serve its cause amply.

  1. The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime ...

    to find the cause of this, such as the Marxist and Left Realist do, will have no effect of the rate of crime. What we can try and achieve is to lessen the impact of crime on the victims, particularly crimes like burglary where there are major concerns for the public.

  2. Evaluate the strengths and limitations of using self-completion written questionnaires to investigate unauthorised absences ...

    A questionnaire also has limitations by hindering the answers a child, teacher or parent can give to the sociologist.

  1. Outline and evaluate the view that crime and deviance are socially constructed

    (Haralambos, 2008) In conclusion, the law of a country does not exist without constant influences ? it is moulded together by a moral conduct of traditions and customs adhered to in that society. Although many sociologist?s opinions would vary on how these customs come about, majority would agree that it

  2. Evaluate the contribution of Marxist theories to our understanding of the role and functions ...

    in their place, and used cynically by the ruling class to create a ?mystical fog? to cover the real misery of the exploitation they are responsible for. One example to support Marx?s theory come from the caste system in Hinduism, which used religion to legitimate the class divide, serving the

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work