• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Classical School of Criminology

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The Classical School of Criminology The Classical School of Criminology evolved out of a response against the barbaric system of law, justice and punishment that subsisted before 1789. It sought an emphasis on free will and human rationality. The Classical School was not interested in studying criminals, but rather law-making and legal processing. They believed that humans were hedonistic but rational beings, deterred from unlawful behaviour by threat of sanction. Therefore, punishment is made in order to deter people from committing crime. Classical theory focused on a legal definition of crime rather than a definition of criminal behaviour. Two famous philosophers of this classical epoch were Cesare Beccaria and Jeremy Bentham. Beccaria focused on the law, its punishments, and its outcome on the individual--crime was a result of bad laws not bad people; Bentham was concerned with utilitarianism-the greatest good for the greatest number of people. Both men supported the idea of a social contract-individuals agree to give up some of their freedom to the state, and in return, the state will protect them; people create the government to defend their mutual promises by laws and punishments. While Beccaria's ideas hailed him as "the father of criminology", his ideas along with Bentham's paved the way for human rights and free will. ...read more.

Middle

Beccaria states that the punishment must be proportional to the crime-hence, it should not be excessively harsher than the crime (1764, p.281). Excessive punishments actually encourage crime-by making minor and serious offences equally punishable, disproportionate punishments make it in the interests of would-be offenders to commit the more serious crimes (Brantingham, 2001). My concern is one of determining suitable proportionality for a crime-it is not written out specifically for each crime, like the Criminal Code is, making it difficult for a judge to apply suitable punishment proportionality to the crime. Therefore, I think proportionality, like beauty, is in the eye of the beholder-except it is the judge who has the actual say in proportionality. This is why people are allowed to appeal their sentence and why others protest, criticize, and complain about a given one. In my opinion, the average punishments for Canadian crimes are not justified-criminals are getting off easy, and that is unacceptable. Aggravated sexual assault is life without parole for 25 years, yet the average time served is about 37 months. Justification relies on empirical demonstration that general and specific deterrence is accomplished (Brantingham, 2001). General deterrence in this case may result in high recidivism rates due to the fact that this example lacks proportionality and celerity (from previous example). ...read more.

Conclusion

Classical theory is also supported by due process-to ensure that the government does not act oppressively or tolerate appreciable risks of inaccurate findings of guilt (Packer, 1968, p.303-305). This is probably where certain individuals may see the criminal justice system as lenient since due process advocates are willing to release the factually guilty to deter government violations of rights. The Rule of Strict Interpretation states that the scope of criminal law should be applied to the smallest possible set of behaviours and judicial application of it should always opt to cover the fewest possible types of behaviour (Brantingham, 2001). Therefore, if the law restricts too many behaviors, then too many things will be considered a crime, and the purpose of the social contract will be flawed. Beccaria and Bentham were strong influences in the Classical School of Criminology. Being advocates of the social contract they believed that it was in the society's best interest that the government ensured the safety and happiness of society. Beccaria believed that efficacy in the law and its punishments would ensure this security while Bentham's utilitarianism complimented this belief. Together they formed the basis for future generations of criminal justice systems around the world-including our very own Canadian criminal justice system today. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Is The Judicial System Racist?

    There is a much higher chance of an Afro Caribbean being stopped and searched (five times higher) then a person from any another ethnic group. This means that they are subjected to stereotypes of society (and the police are part of that society), so as they are being stopped more there is more chance of them being arrested.

  2. REVISION - CRIME, PUNISHMENT AND PROTEST INTRODUCTION Crime, Punishment and Protest covers a period ...

    3: Law enforcement Once laws have been decided, they have to be enforced. While this is true of all societies, the methods used vary from period to period. Sometimes the whole adult community was involved in apprehending suspects and deciding their guilt.

  1. Discuss the effectiveness of the Prison system, and its purpose in relation to its ...

    Research has also indicated that they are less likely to receive police cautions unlike their white counterparts and more likely to face criminal proceedings. All of the features above suggest that discrimination is rife within the criminal justice system and that institutional racism is the cause for the over representation of ethnic minorities within the prison system.

  2. How does positive criminology differ from classical criminology in its approach to understanding criminology ...

    Rationality,- This is where we think about each pro and con of each action we take, and we think about what we are doing. Self-intrest.- The classical school believed that we were all born selfish, and that we try to minimalise pain and maximize pleasure.

  1. A Failing Justice System

    Innocent people go to jail whereas criminals go on committing crimes without any punishment (Fraser, The Failing Criminal Justice System in England & Wales). Many crimes are not even registered (Demirbas 83). The perpetrators of crimes use "legal loopholes" not to be punished (Fraser).

  2. How might we best explain the rise of the prison as a replacement for ...

    The American revolt brought the issueof transportation to a head and the British involvement in the conflict from 1776-83 disrupted the shipping of criminals to America. This caused English prisons to fill however little was initially done to find a solution.

  1. Is the judicial system racist?

    Methodology The first research methodology I chose is Positivist. The key features of this research are that it is more about data, statistics and structured interviews then case studies. The advantages are that I will be able to easily find statistics from the web and by doing a questionnaire I can find out the public's view on things I want to find out about.

  2. public law

    Although there were not a handful of incidents that directly led to the legislative proposal, those who represent the developmentally disabled have been making strides toward improving their quality of life. The bill was presented during National Crime Victims Rights Week, in April of 1998.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work