• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Marxist view of education

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay on the Marxist view of education I will be looking at and evaluating the Marxist view of education. The theory of Marxist sociologists was developed by Karl Marx a German political philosopher in the 19th century. It is a structuralised approach (individual is less important than the social structure). Marxists see society as characterised by conflicts of interests. Marxists analysis is based on historical materialism; this means that all societies can be characterised by the nature of their mode of production. Society is divided into the infrastructure and the superstructure. The economic base, the infrastructure dictates the activities of all other institutions, which Karl Marx terms as the superstructure. The economy is therefore the most important institution. Marxist sociologists state that the education system is there to serve the interests of the Capitalists. They argue that there are two main groups in society; these are the Ruling class and the Subject class. ...read more.

Middle

They state that the education system produces a subservient workforce. They found that the grades students achieved related more to personality qualities than educational ability. Low grades were related to creativity aggressiveness and independence, while high grades were related to determination consistency, reliability and punctuality. They reject the functionalist view that those who get high qualifications and jobs do so because of their social background and because they do what they are told and work hard. Bowles and Gintis also claim that the hidden curriculum encourages acceptance of hierarchy. Schools are organised on the hierarchical principle of authority and control. This prepares them for relationships within the workplace. Teachers are the ones who give the orders; students are then expected to obey. This relates to their later experience of lack of control in the workplace. They state that pupils learn to be motivated by external rewards for example, educational qualifications. This corresponds with the workplace, workers are motivated by external rewards, a salary or wage. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many pupils break school rules, in one of Willis' studies he found that the working class boys behaved in a way that definitely would not encourage them to be passive workers. Bowles and Gintis ignore the formal curriculum. This is significant in that some of the subjects taught in schools do not encourage uncritical passive behaviour, sometimes the reverse (e.g. communications, law, government and politics etc). Reynolds suggests that Bowles and Gintis fail to sufficiently explain how the economy shapes the education system. He suggests it is not possible for British capitalists to control education as such. Teachers' control to a large extent what occurs in classrooms; they may have quite fundamental ideas. They are not mere capitalist puppets. Bowles and Gintis developed their theory in the 1970's. It is yet still relevant today. The government was responsible for introducing a National Curriculum. This means they have increased control over what occurs in the classroom. Overall, the curriculum has become more openly designed to meet the needs of the economy. Nuray Gungor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and economy.

    The education system disguises this with its myth of meritocracy. Those who are denied success blame themselves and not the system. Their argument is based on studies that are conducted on people with their average IQs. They say that if education was meritocratic they would have similar outcomes, however they found a wide variety of outcomes.

  2. According to Marxist, the main aim of the education system is to provide capitalist ...

    As they are not obtaining any internal satisfaction, they turn to the external rewards that can be obtained as a result of acquiring an educational qualification. They therefore stay in the system now motivated by the attractive wage packages etc, which can be obtained as a result of being educated.

  1. Assess The View That Material Deprivation Is The Most Important Barrier To Educational Attainment.

    Sugarman concludes that subcultures of pupils from working class backgrounds place them at a disadvantage in the educational system. Language is yet another explanation for low educational attainment. Bernstein found two system codes used within a school. The first was restricted code, which was used only by working class children.

  2. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    in the job hierarchy to a level most suited to their abilities. Equally importantly schools teach the value of equality of opportunity. Pupils in schools are treated with universalistic values in a meritocratic system; therefore all are treated equally and do well or badly through their own effort and ability.

  1. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    They can lead to poor concentration and attitude due to tiredness and malnutrition. This could well lead to illnesses and absence from school and lower the child's chances of succeeding in the education system. Although this study was done in the 1960s so circumstances have changed since then so it may not be so relevant today.

  2. Compare and Contrast functionalist and marxist views on religion

    All of these crises are surrounded with religious ritual, such as death and a funeral. In Malinowski's eyes it, expresses the belief in immortality and comforts the bereaved. Also with the presence of all the family and friends at the funeral support the mourner and help them to control their stress through the expression of solidarity.

  1. What were the lives of people like in the 19th century cities?

    This class was a major update during the Industrial Revolution and a change towards today's society. It let the people with possibilities use them and live a better life. Daniel, due to the work he has, can't think his life was ruined.

  2. Religion can both be a conservative force and an initiator of social change. To ...

    However, Calvinists did not know whether they were amongst the elect and convinced themselves that they had been chosen to go to heaven. They believed that if they behaved well they would be able to go to heaven after earth.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work