• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Marxist view of education

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Essay on the Marxist view of education I will be looking at and evaluating the Marxist view of education. The theory of Marxist sociologists was developed by Karl Marx a German political philosopher in the 19th century. It is a structuralised approach (individual is less important than the social structure). Marxists see society as characterised by conflicts of interests. Marxists analysis is based on historical materialism; this means that all societies can be characterised by the nature of their mode of production. Society is divided into the infrastructure and the superstructure. The economic base, the infrastructure dictates the activities of all other institutions, which Karl Marx terms as the superstructure. The economy is therefore the most important institution. Marxist sociologists state that the education system is there to serve the interests of the Capitalists. They argue that there are two main groups in society; these are the Ruling class and the Subject class. ...read more.

Middle

They state that the education system produces a subservient workforce. They found that the grades students achieved related more to personality qualities than educational ability. Low grades were related to creativity aggressiveness and independence, while high grades were related to determination consistency, reliability and punctuality. They reject the functionalist view that those who get high qualifications and jobs do so because of their social background and because they do what they are told and work hard. Bowles and Gintis also claim that the hidden curriculum encourages acceptance of hierarchy. Schools are organised on the hierarchical principle of authority and control. This prepares them for relationships within the workplace. Teachers are the ones who give the orders; students are then expected to obey. This relates to their later experience of lack of control in the workplace. They state that pupils learn to be motivated by external rewards for example, educational qualifications. This corresponds with the workplace, workers are motivated by external rewards, a salary or wage. ...read more.

Conclusion

Many pupils break school rules, in one of Willis' studies he found that the working class boys behaved in a way that definitely would not encourage them to be passive workers. Bowles and Gintis ignore the formal curriculum. This is significant in that some of the subjects taught in schools do not encourage uncritical passive behaviour, sometimes the reverse (e.g. communications, law, government and politics etc). Reynolds suggests that Bowles and Gintis fail to sufficiently explain how the economy shapes the education system. He suggests it is not possible for British capitalists to control education as such. Teachers' control to a large extent what occurs in classrooms; they may have quite fundamental ideas. They are not mere capitalist puppets. Bowles and Gintis developed their theory in the 1970's. It is yet still relevant today. The government was responsible for introducing a National Curriculum. This means they have increased control over what occurs in the classroom. Overall, the curriculum has become more openly designed to meet the needs of the economy. Nuray Gungor ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    They argue that meritocracy in society is a myth, which merely reduces the discontent of those who are least successful, and that the education system is just something that serves the needs of capitalism by legitimating inequality and thus preventing conflict.

  2. a) With reference to the Items and elsewhere, assess the view that the introduction ...

    Whereas the middle class as pushed toward deferred gratification so they get the highest qualification they can. There are criticisms to how home factors explain differential educational achievement between social classes. One criticism is that there is no clear way to define class, there aren't any objective to meet to be classed as working class or middle.

  1. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and economy.

    Parson are stated that within the family the child is judged on particularistic values and in a society the child is judged on universalistic standards, which are standards applied to every individual in society. The child moves from particularistic standards to universalistic standards.

  2. Assess The View That Material Deprivation Is The Most Important Barrier To Educational Attainment.

    He also found that members of the working class place a lower value on achieving higher occupational status. In evaluating jobs, they emphasize "stability, security and immediate economic benefits" and tend to reject the risks and investments involved in aiming for high status occupations.

  1. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and the economy

    All these processes of secondary socialisation, described by Durkheim, contribute to value consensus and the specialised division of labour. Parsons (1961 'The school class and the social system') argued that school is necessary, because it bridges the gap, between primary socialisation in the family and adult society.

  2. Free essay

    This essay discusses the functionalist and Marxist approach to the relationship between education and ...

    This rests on the assumption that technical education is a productive investment - a means by which societies can bring about and sustain economic growth. Schools, Colleges and universities provide highly educated and trained workers who have the necessary knowledge and skills to make effective use of the advanced productive technologies found in modern industries.

  1. "Society originates because the individual is not self sufficient and no two of us ...

    This would lead to war, for which is needed an army, where "soldiers go out and defend"21 the lives and guard the property of the civilians. They have a natural aptitude that makes them suited to this job alone and are called "Guardians"22.

  2. To what extent do feminist theories remain relevant for interpreting gendered patterns of work.

    employment, it still is not enough to account for the sustained gender roles which emerge in the house, thus the sustained gap between men and women in employment. The present reality of the gender divisions in the pay gap - for example - is another aspect which feminist theory is not enough to explain.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work