• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

'The media simply reflect and reinforce existing social values, they cannot change society.'

Extracts from this document...


'The media simply reflect and reinforce existing social values, they cannot change society.' There is a notion held by many people that the media has the power to affect our beliefs, attitudes, values and behaviours either directly or indirectly. Many sociologists believe that the media could be extremely powerful and influential because of their technology, economics, and because of the sheer scale of operations. There has been a tremendous amount of research done into the possible short and long term effects of the media on society but very little has been proved either way. Early research often stressed the construction of the audience and made assumptions about the impact on the public. This includes the hypodermic effect theory, also known as the behaviourist approach, which sees the mass media as not just an influence on society but as being able to directly affect us with a metaphorical, powerful syringe full of messages directly into the mind. Based on the theory that behaviour is learnt through rewards and punishment, the notion here is that the media could provide a model of behaviour which could influence people by showing them that they could get the same results as those portrayed in what they had read/seen/heard. ...read more.


Morley found that the different types of audience did indeed take different meanings from the programme; the middle class viewers didn't like the patronizing tone but accepted what they saw was true, and the working class viewers liked what it said but not the content. Black students interviewed said the content and the tone was irrelevant to them. This research is seen as a step forward from some of the earlier approaches such as the behaviourist approach as it at least presumes that the audience is creating meanings from the messages that they consume, however it doesn't take into account for intended meanings of the media and whether or not the meanings can influence or reinforce our views. This theory comes with the assumption that the media has no influence on society at all. Also this research has been criticised for being too narrow in its selection of people to represent 'society' for research. Research was conducted through interviews on selected groups. No specific research was done on the reactions of women. A large scale survey might have had better and more accurate results. The problem with this and the behaviourist approaches are that neither takes into account the ability the media might have to set agendas by continuing to show one version of reality to their audience. ...read more.


The value of the boundary line must continually be reasserted; we can only know what it is to be saintly by being told just what the shape of the devil is.' (Stanley Cohen, Images of defiance (penguin 1982), introduction) Whatever the view they each hold the notion that the media is setting an agenda whether it's for subconscious or conscious reasons. Another element of the cultural effects theory is that it often takes into account the audience effect model. Although this approach would seem a common sense approach it is not very testable, however this theory coupled with the audience effects model could go a long way to explaining what the effects of the media are on society. Despite all the research done on media effects there is very little conclusive evidence to suggest that the media can change society. This does not mean that it does not, just that it is very difficult to prove or disprove because of the so many different variables that can affect the research. Even though there is little conclusive evidence common sense would suggest that if the mass media cannot change society then it certainly would seem to influence it, if there were no influence there then the billions spent on advertising would be a waste of money. 1 Micaela Owen media essay ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. "Any sociological explanation of the influence of the mass media needs to take into ...

    The attacker was either rewarded, punished or not rewarded/punished. After seeing the violent act where the attacker was rewarded, the children copied the same behaviour. This shows imitation when they know there is no harm in doing it. However, children didn't tend to copy the attack when the attacker was punished.

  2. The function of Education is to develop and reinforce social solidarity.

    As well as pledging allegiance Makes individuals feel part of a group and therefore less likely to break rules. To maintain social roles Durkhiem says School is a society in miniature. It has a similar hierarchy, rules, expectations to the "outside world".

  1. How does the media represent female bodies?

    However I have read this magazine several times in the past and I know that it does include plastic surgery stories but in this particular issue it neglected this topic due to a top 10 sexiest men story. Between the other 4 magazines 36 pages of images were dedicated to

  2. Do the Media have the power to shape public opinion?

    much more of an impact than any of the founding fathers of sociology proposed. Thompson sees the Frankfurt attitude to the media as too negative and he wishes to move away from such a view. The mass media do not, according to Thompson, limit critical thought as all aforementioned theorists have done.

  1. "The media reflects society; just as there is diversity in society, there is diversity ...

    The main difference between Pluralism and Marxism is that the Pluralist model of the media assumes rather than demonstrate that media content is diverse. Marxist theories share almost nothing in common with the pluralist theories. They conflict on almost ever view they have.

  2. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    generally more accepting as they need not acquire an image in the way the upper-classes do. It is also true that upper-class families are more likely to discourage television and computer games as they often partake in more varied activities outside the home whereas lower-class families build up home entertainment

  1. How is Crime represented in the Media

    These are: * Conducting Pilot Surveys * Using Sample frames * Then Conducting Cross-Sectional Surveys drawn up from the strengths of the pilot survey * Conducting an interview The Pilot survey would involve a trial run, to ensure that I have got everything right.

  2. What are some of the key messages and ideas presented in the novella, Fahrenheit ...

    Beatty also explains this to Montag, "Don't step on the toes of the dog lovers, the cat lovers, doctors, lawyers, merchants, chiefs, Mormons, Baptists, Unitarians, second-generation Chinese, Swedes, Italians, Germans, Texans, Brooklynites, Irishmen, people from Oregon or Mexico.(p.57)" Bradbury positions his readers, through the role that censorship plays in Fahrenheit

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work