• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The motive of censorship is to stabilize and control society, over which government has control. Do you agree?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

The motive of censorship is to stabilize and control society, over which government has control. Do you agree? Freedom of expression is a fundamental right but also a conflicting right as people is free to express their discontent and create upheavals in the working of society. Therefore, censorship of some kind is a must to stabilize or control society through government's assistance. First, the widespread support for censorship rest on the important societal goals served by it. It works for benefits of each individual inhabiting in society, whether its children, people or society as a whole. Second, censorship protects each one's religious or cultural background. They don't let any sort of speeches to publish that incites threat to any religion. Third, censorship is heredity of government to safeguard country's unity, integrity, security. No matter with what sort of freedom people are being endowed, censorship defend national's pride and honor. ...read more.

Middle

Censorship refers to examination of books, periodicals, plays, films, television and radio programs, internet and other communication media for the purpose of altering and suppressing those parts thought to be offensive or objectionable for religious tolerance. It does not tolerate any sort of misbehaves with religions. It checks offensive speeches that intended to stir up aggression against certain groups of religious, racial. Proponents of freedom adheres that Universal Declaration of Human Rights has clearly mentioned in Article 19, "Everyone has the right to express, opinion, information regardless of frontiers." Arguably, some circumstances get created in society where no option is left with government except "Censorship". Such as, when 13 of Nepalese were brutally murdered in Iraq and Nepal went through complete destruction of Human Power Agencies and other resources were submerged in the anger on Nepalese people, government has only one option to put censorship in the form on curfew. ...read more.

Conclusion

As, for example, some credit of the booming economic condition of china goes to its Communists party which follows less freedom i.e. censorship. For these reasons, censorship guides society along with its economy to track into development process rather that being trapped into the web of political instability. In short, no one can deny that freedom of expression is born right of people. But as the famous saying goes, "man is born free and he is chained everywhere" accordingly some circumstances outcome in society where implementation of censorship is a must. However, censorship without any base is an evil and the government which adopts it, is nothing more that a dictator. Therefore, any kind of censorship to be practiced, it must be provided by law, pursues legitimate aim and must be in proportion to its aim. Finally, government is selected by people and they would not get anything by oppressing their selector's rights, so selectors should," trust the government for making censorship." ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. Which is the Greater Evil - Censorship vs. Freedom of Speech.

    Similarly, the notion robs individuals of their personality, protests, and hope for change. Censorship leads one to believe that certain materials of general media are wrong and immoral. However, one cannot deny that much of the literature that is banned under the umbrella of censorship, is merely the harsh reality of life, as is the case in Margaret Laurence's novel.

  2. Censorship is necessary to protect the public

    independent watchdogs, and would result in a society with much less aggressive laws and guidelines. However, this would be almost impossible to implement because boundaries would inevitably be pushed. Self-regulation of the press has been very successful regarding coverage of Prince William, as described previously, but on other occasions it has not.

  1. Moral Panic and media folk devils.

    This shows that when they see the stories and see how it affecting others they themselves become influenced by the media. It also confirms my belief that the older generation is affected more as they panic on subjects such as computer games whereas children don't.

  2. Do we need Censorship in the Media?

    cutting the rock in pieces and finding the same phrase or word on all of them. The film 'No Orchids for Ms. Blandish' also sparked controversy because it dealt with perversion and people wee worried on the effects it would have on the public, this film was made in 1948.

  1. What are the advantages and disadvantages of Censorship.

    However, if they are responding tin such an impressionable manner to a film, there is no doubt that they will be just as likely to pick something up from somewhere else, regardless of whether the film is made accessible to them or not.

  2. Explain and Discuss Moral Panics.

    fallen victim to the demands of the media and the general public in making the country a safer place and preventing such a tragedy as Dunblane from ever occurring again. The Dunblane incident highlights the fact that many innocent people fall victim of certain moral panics once they are orchestrated by the media.

  1. Whait is society

    a leader there are various things that have to be decided by the group such as who has the brains, maturity and people skills to be in charge of such a large group, if there is a leader selected than the leader has to decide who is going to do

  2. Would you agree that Louis stabilised France in the period 1815-1824?

    This resulted in the Chamber consisting of a large majority of young, inexperienced and extreme royalists who became known as the Ultras.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work