• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime and Deviance.

Extracts from this document...


The Strengths and Limitations of Left Realism and Right Realism Theories in Explaining Crime and Deviance. Left Realism is a different perspective on crime and deviance developed in the early 1980s by sociologists, advancing from Marxism and Neo-Marxism. Two prominent supporters of this perspective are Jock Young and John Lea. Young and Lea began to develop an approach to explaining crime and deviance. They argue that crime is rooted in social conditions and argue that crime is closely related to deprivation but reject the view that poverty and unemployment can be directly responsible for crime. In the 1930s unemployment was very high, yet the crime rate remained minimal compared to the 1980s. More recently, Young (1997) has stressed that since World War Two the dramatically improved living standards and the introduction of welfare provisions have gone hand-in-hand with the growth of the crime rate. Young and Lea base their attempts to explain crime around three key concepts: Relative Deprivation- It is not the fact of being deprived which causes crime but the feeling of deprivation. A group or individual will experience relative deprivation when they feel deprived in comparison to similar groups or the people around you. So in today's modern society, where everyday the media report the importance of success and the consumption of consumer goods, this leaves individuals feeling they should be aspiring to a middle-class lifestyle and patterns of consumption. ...read more.


Along with the advantages of Left Realism it also has its weaknesses, the theory neglects to recognise other responses to relative deprivation and marginality other than crime and does not consider other theories such as Merton's Retreatism, Ritualism or Rebellion. The research that Left Realism was founded on is based on Victim Survey's to measure the extent of fear of crime within a community, a method that is not always reliable or accurate. Some crimes are either under- reported or over-reported, making the statistics and figures unreliable and crimes such as white-collar crime aren't paid much attention. The Left Realism theory only explains why the relatively deprived turn to crime, yet it fails to explain why some individuals do not choice a deviant career despite how other could consider them relatively deprived. Whatever its advantages or disadvantages, left realism has undisputedly shaped social policy much more profoundly than any other criminological theory. The Labour government's slogan 'tough on crime, tough on the causes of crime' mirrors the fundamental concepts of left realist thinking, and now, policies have been implemented so that the public can be employed to carry out routine police tasks; giving officers more time for investigation and follow-up work. Right Realism is now, arguable, the greatest influence on currant Home Office Policy of all theories of crime, because of the practical policies for crime prevention which derive from it. ...read more.


Their theories also assume that all criminal acts are thought out and that the offender has carefully weighed up the benefits and cost of their actions, yet some acts are irrational and impulsive having no gain or objective, such as vandalism and violence. The 'zero tolerance' approach taken by police can cause an over-emphasis on minor crimes and divert crucial resources away from tackling more serious offences that cause greater harm to people. The increase policing in an area also has the possibility of just displacing the crime into another area, moving it around instead of reducing it. Despite being two different theories on the explanation of crime and deviance Left and Right Realism do converge, or agree, in certain policy areas. Both sides recognise that there exists an actual crime problem which has destructive effects on communities and take on a pragmatic view, agreeing that as well as discovering the theory behind criminal and deviant behaviour you also need a practical approach applied to tackle the problem. Furthermore, Left and Right Realists address the role of the victim in crime, unlike other theories. In conclusion both left and right realism are good at explaining crime and deviance as they both take on different approaches to look at the subject. Although both are weak theories on their own, if they are used together or are merged, they can be used to give a fuller view on the causes of crime and deviance. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    In a well-integrated society, according to Merton, people use accepted means to achieve the goals society establishes. In other words, the goals and means of the society are in balance. When the means are out of balance with the goals, this produces strain and deviance is likely to occur.

  2. Access the strengths and limitations of Subcultural Theories in explaining deviance.

    Rebellion- Individuals reject the existing goals in society and substitute new ones to create a new society, like revolutionaries or members of some religious sectors. This is Merton's strain theory. While Merton's strain theory clearly explains deviance as arising from the structure of society, there are a few limitations to his explanation of why deviance occurs.

  1. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    The media used images from the New York ghetto, defining street robberies into a new youth, violent street crime called "mugging". The moral panic associated with mugging quickly focused on black youths. The problem was meant to have stemmed from social deprivation and racial inequality.

  2. Assess the usefulness of realist explanations of crime and deviance

    They accused right realism of over-dramatising problems with crime and failing to understand the real causes of crime. They also criticised Marxists and radical criminology of failing to understand working class crime. Unlike right realists, left realists look at the victims of the crime committed.

  1. Outline and Assess Subcultural Theories of Crime and Deviance

    The key thing is that most people control these deviant desires, they may rarely emerge, say at the office party, yet when they do we use techniques of neutralisation to provide justification for our deviant actions. Some examples include the denial of responsibility- it wasn't me, it was the

  2. My hypothesis I expect to find that the official crime statistics in ...

    However I can not compare the national average for crime to my found results and so cannot say the actual crime rate, therefore it may simply be that less crime in my area is reported than in other areas of England, therefore I cannot accept my second hypotheses to be true.

  1. Compare and Contrast the Main Sociological Theories of Deviance.

    People who commit these crimes may not get prosecuted for it may be due to the people who commit these crimes are professionals with a high status, so they know how to prevent themselves from getting caught.

  2. Assess Marxist theories of crime and deviance.

    He found that only 1.5% of these had been prosecuted. This showed that even when the law applied, they were not enforced on capitalists. Marxists also show that even laws that appear to be made by the people, for the people, are in reality made by capitalists so that they can maintain their power and profit.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work