• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

This paper attempts to analyse Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. In order to do so, the paper firstly summarises the article, highlighting the key issues raised. This is followed by a brief commentary

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Nishen Kotecha INTRODUCTION This paper attempts to analyse Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. In order to do so, the paper firstly summarises the article, highlighting the key issues raised. This is followed by a brief commentary on the significance of the text in relation to the development of criminology. A definition of two key concepts used in the text will be provided. Finally, the paper compares the article with Wilson and Keeling's (1997) "Broken Windows" and Packer's (1969) "Two Models of the Criminal Process" articles by looking at the theoretical and disciplinary perspectives of all three texts, the types of evidence used and the contribution each of the three has made to the development of Criminology. SUMMARY OF ARGUMENTS In "On Crimes and Punishments", Beccaria proposed a broad prescription for reform of the criminal justice system to make it more logical and rational. He adopted the concept of the "social contract", arguing that citizens agreed to give up some of their personal freedom in order to grant the state powers to enforce laws and punish offenders in order to preserve social harmony. In return, the state must not abuse the fundamental rights of the individual. Because criminal laws place restrictions on individual freedom, they should be restricted in scope. Laws should reflect "the necessary conditions of the social contract, and punishments should exist only to defend the total sacrificed liberties against the usurpation of those liberties by other individuals (Reid 1976:109)". He further claimed that "every punishment which does not arise from absolute necessity is tyrannical (Beccaria 1764:2)". Beccaria also claimed that only laws can make a ruling on crimes and authority for this can reside only with the legislators and not with the judiciary. Judges cannot have the authority to interpret laws. Instead, they should apply syllogism. "The major should be the general law; the minor, the conformity of the action, or its opposition to the laws; the conclusion, liberty, or punishment (Beccaria 1764:3)". ...read more.

Middle

This was attractive to legal authorities because it was based on the social contract theory which supports the uniform enforcement of laws without questioning whether these laws were fair or just. However, Beirne and Messerschmidt (1994) argue that Beccaria's book actually constituted a fundamental break from the concepts of free will and that his intent was to move to a deterministic stance. They claim that Beccaria's arguments, that human behaviour was predictable and controllable, and that public, prompt, minimal and appropriate punishments would result in lower rates of crime, were highly deterministic ones, against the theological assertions about human free will. They further claim that although Beccaria focused on the causal impact of criminal justice policies on criminal behaviour, he also pointed to the factors in larger societies that also had a causal impact on crime, such as education, poverty and economic inequality, but he had done that carefully as he feared retribution. According to Hazlehurst (1996), even more important for the book's acceptance was the fact that the American Revolution of 1776 and the French Revolution of 1789 occurred soon after its publication. Both revolutions were guided by ideas of Naturalism and of the social contract whereas Beccaria's ideas were the basis for the French Code of 1791 and their new criminal justice system. From America and France, Beccaria's ideas spread to the rest of the industrialised world. Beccaria's ideas were adopted and further developed by neo-classicists, positivists and modern agencies of social control (Vold et al 1998, Hazlehurst 1996, Taylor, Walton and Young 1973). Neoclassicists provided the modifications necessary for the administration of the criminal law based on classical theory that resulted from practical experience (Vold et al 1998). Later transition form classical theories to positivist theories marked a continuing development in the direction to which Beccaria pointed. It has been further claimed that Beccaria's view is now "the major model of human behaviour held to by agencies of social control in all advanced industrial societies" (Taylor, Walton and Young 1973:9-10). ...read more.

Conclusion

On the other hand, due process model accepts the possibility of error and attempts to prevent and eliminate mistakes. Packer further claimed that a person is not to be held guilty for a crime by merely showing that in all probability, based upon reliable evidence, he did factually what he is said to have done. Instead, he is to be held guilty if and only if these factual determinations are made in procedurally regular fashion and by authorities acting within competences duly allocated to them. He adds that many requirements such as jurisdiction, venue, statute of limitations, double jeopardy and criminal responsibility have nothing to do with the factual question of whether the person did or did not engage in the conduct that is he/she is being charged for. Packer had also stressed the issue of equality. He claims that the relative financial inability of most persons accused of crime results in treatment very different from that accorded to the small minority of the financially capable. For this reason, its impact has already been substantial and may be expected to be even more so in the future. Finally, Packer argues that there is a wide-spread skepticism about the morality and utility of the criminal sanctions. CONCLUSION The paper has provided a summary of Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. The paper has also provided a brief commentary on the significance of the text in relation to the development of criminology, analysing issues of its contribution to foundations of classical criminology, challenges to and removal of spiritualism, criticism of extensive and cruel punishment and inequality in society, possible fundamental break with the concept of free will and move to a deterministic stance, its contribution to the French and American Revolutions, and its contribution to neo-classicism, positivism and modern agencies of social control. Finally, the paper has compared Beccaria's ideas with those of Wilson and Keeling (1982) and Packer's (1969), in terms of theoretical and disciplinary perspectives employed. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Crime: Social construction or reality?

    Right realists believe it is the individual's free choice to commit crime. Crime is the path the deviants choose to take, having no regard for others feelings. Rising crime statistics show crime is a serious problem. Felson (1998:39) label offenders ordinary people who commit ordinary crimes.

  2. Which is more effective - punishment by imprisonment or with in the community?

    alternative to imprisonment, which involves up to 240 hours of unpaid community work, a combination of these is a Community Punishment and Rehabilitation Order, and finally Drug Treatment and Testing Orders where the offender has a request in his order to receive treatment for a long standing drug dependence which necessitates criminal behaviours.

  1. What are the key differences between positivism and classicist approaches to crime control? Which ...

    The major shortcomings of Lambrosian theory can be summarised as, the failure to have variety and creativeness, denial of individual activity and imposing limitations on the scope of agency in crime. Crime is viewed as abnormal rather than a development from other social factors.

  2. How does positive criminology differ from classical criminology in its approach to understanding criminology ...

    Punishment must not be in proportion to the crime, It should be set on a scale with the most severe penalties corresponding to offences which cause most harm to the society. the most serious crimes are those that threaten the stability of society.

  1. ‘Discuss the use of alternative strategies of crime prevention and reduction.To illustrate your answer ...

    They then catalogued the numbers of crimes committed in the area over a period of time (Laycock, 1991). They discovered, however, that using street lights as an SCP method did not actually have an effect on reported crime rates, but the lights were welcomed by the general public as they reduced the fear of crime (p.viii).

  2. Discuss the effectiveness of the Prison system, and its purpose in relation to its ...

    of borstals (establishments used to house young offender institutions), which was named after Borstal, in Kent where the first such institute was set up in 1901. As a result of the Gladstone committee the early 20th century saw a change in the way prisoners were kept, and led to the development of open prisons.

  1. The Classical School of Criminology

    Severity is the kind of punishment the offender is likely to receive. Certainty is the likelihood of the offender being punished. Some argue that the likelihood of being punished is more significant than the kind of punishment likely to be received (Sacco & Kennedy, 1998, p.131)-in fact, if certainty is high, severity can be lower.

  2. Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors ...

    Murray believes that the absence of a father means a lack of male role-model breaking down crucial primary socialisation. For Murray, the underclass is not only a source of crime, but its very existence threatens social cohesion by undermining the values of hard work and personal responsibility.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work