• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

To what extent can it be argued that violent films cause violence in society?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

To what extent can it be argued that violent films cause violence in society? The claim that violent films, as well as violent media, cause violence in society can be both supported and contradicted with reference to sociological studies and theory. Proponents of the Hypodermic Model would argue that the media message, in this case violence, directly affects and changes the behaviour of the audience, hence resulting in violent behaviour. The Cultural Effects Model argues that a media message of violence will eventually socialize the audience to accepting it as normal- resulting, in some cases, with violent behaviour. On the other hand, the Interpretive Model argues that the violent media and films will depend on the audience, while the Structured Interpretation Model argues that a dominant media message of violence can be read in different ways, leading to different reactions. However, it is clear that violent media can have an influence on society- with the theories differing mainly on the extent and form of this effect. It can be said that violent films can cause violence in society. The Hypodermic Model, within which it is argued that the media message directly affects and changes the behaviour of the audience, can be used in support of this argument. It is also backed up by theorists; including Shannon and Weaver (1949) ...read more.

Middle

The Model argues that a constant or consistent media diet of violence will eventually socialize the audience into accepting violence as normal- and hence resulting in greater violence in society. Parke et al (1977) argued that young children not prone to violence could become more aggressive if exposed to a steady stream of violence in the media- clearly supporting the view as well as the Cultural Effects Model. Anderson and Dill, in the 'General Affective Aggression Model' that involved a survey as well as an experiment based on playing a violent video game, and then punishing 'opponents' with a noise blast, argue that violent media content can stimulate aggressive behaviour. Newson claims that a media diet of violence can result in the distortion of emotions and the de-sensitisation of younger viewers. The American Association of Paediatrics, in a study on the impact of screen violence, argued that the continuous viewing of screen violence can lead to the build-up of wrong messages stressing the effectiveness of violence. Real-life examples also justify the view that violent films and media cause violence in society- note the influence of viewing violent films in the Bulger murder, and the Columbine massacre. However, many of these studies are criticized by sociologists, mainly because most of them are psychological studies conducted within a laboratory setting, hence lacking ecological validity. ...read more.

Conclusion

The extent to which a violent media message results in violence in society is also affected by mediating factors. Merton, Katz and Lazarsfeld's 'Two-Step Flow' Model argues that a media message is interpreted by important people who guide our interpretation. In this case, it can be argued that a media message of violence within a film can be interpreted and presented to people as negative by individuals such as parents, preachers and others- hence breaking the assumption that violent films can directly cause violence in society. Structured Interpretation on the other hand argues that there still is a dominant and strong media message- in this case, of violent behaviour, and the extent to which this message is interpreted again depends on the audience. In conclusion, it can be said that violent films and violent media content can influence violence in society, as pointed out in many studies, but cannot directly cause it. The extent to which violence in society is caused by violent media content will depend mainly on the way which the audience interprets it, and the way in which the audience acts on this interpretation and message. However, it can be said that other factors, including socialization as well as personal experiences probably play a greater role in causing violence in society than violent films and violent media messages. ?? ?? ?? ?? Edwin Loo 13K 08/03/2008 Sociology Essay Page 2 of 2 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. To what extent do media representations of refugees and asylum seekers limit their integration ...

    Kaye (1998) also argues that the frequent use of such terms as above socialises the reader to believe that the use of such terms is normal political discourse. Furthermore such language gives credibility to the notion that 'bogus' refugees represent a huge problem, without even questioning the suppositions upon which such assertions are based.

  2. Does Media Violence Lead to Aggression and Societal Violence?

    According to the article Teen Health and the Media, "the average American teen spends about 20 hours a week watching television" (Washington State Department of Health). Indeed, we cannot deny the fact that we are exposed to many types of media violence since childhood.

  1. Whait is society

    Although there may be a leader some people may not agree with the leader which would cause a split between the group in the case that this should happen the society should settle the argument on a vote although this could cause problems as the people who feel this is

  2. "Any sociological explanation of the influence of the mass media needs to take into ...

    He concluded that the media exercises power in the interest of the ruling classes & maintains the dominance of those who have economic power. He further stated that the media's role is to 'socialise mass to a life of subordination.' The Empiricist Tradition/Approach (as first proposed by Prof. Halloran)

  1. What are some of the key messages and ideas presented in the novella, Fahrenheit ...

    Beatty explains this to Montag, "Speed up the film, Montag quick...Digests-digests-digests. Politics! One column, two sentences, a headline.(p.55)" The second factor is implied in Fahrenheit 451 as being the most important factor that led to book banning, which is "minorities" and special interest group's objections to the content of the books.

  2. The Effects of the Media on Criminal Behaviour

    The first is Diversion. This use is for entertainment reasons, i.e. television etc. The second is Personal Relationships where the audience gains companionship with the characters, or through discussion with others about television. The third is Personal Identity, where the user accesses the mass media in order to identify with certain characters, i.e.

  1. Media and The Sexualization of Young Girls

    The fourth tool is consumer advocacy and action. We can and must engage actively with the media. We have the ability to critique, analyze, challenge, and affirm media messages. We also have the option of turning off, boycotting, and disengaging from media that denigrate or insult girls.

  2. Television and How it Affects Society

    That can be a lot for a college student and could be a bad habit to start getting into. Kubey and Csikszentmihalyi also said in their article that some people that were in a study said ?If a television is on, I just can?t keep my eyes off it,? ?I

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work