• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to an understanding of the role of education in society.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

F) Using material from Item A and elsewhere assess the contribution of functionalist sociology to an understanding of the role of education in society. Functionalists have constructed two questions to help them research education. The first question is. "What are the functions of education for society as a whole?" and the second question is. "What are the functional relationships between the education system and other parts of the social system". Firstly, Functionalism is a theory. A theory based on "value consensus". Functionalism is based on the view that society is a system of interdependent parts held together by a shared culture or value consensus (an agreement amongst society's members about what values are important). Functionalist theories assume the different parts of a society each have their own role to play (their own "function"), and work together smoothly in order to form a harmonious whole (macro). The metaphor often used to describe functionalism is that it views society as a body, with the different socialisation agents -government, media, religion, the family, etc., and, of course, education-being like the different organs in a body, each contributing in a different way to keeping the entire body healthy. Emile Durkhiem writing at the turn of the last century found that the major function of schools was the transmission of society's norms and values. Durkhiem stated that without "essential similarities", co-operation and social solidarity social life would be impossible, there needs to be a "degree of homogeneity". ...read more.

Middle

The hidden curriculum shapes the future workforce in the following ways. It provides a subservient workforce by penalising creativity, aggressiveness and independence and rewarding perseverance consistency, dependability and punctuality. It also encourages acceptance of hierarchy, students obey teachers, and this reflects the workplace where they obey their employers. At school students are encouraged be external reward just as a workforce in capitalist society are rewarded by external rewards. School promotes fragmentation of the curriculum; this is reflected in the workplace where specific tasks are carried out by different people. Further more education makes society feel fair and just. The workers are socialised to believe that equality of opportunity exists and that the system is meritocratic, this is called the legitimisation of inequality. Bowles and Ginitis reject the Functionalists perspective of Parsons and Davis and Moore that the education system is meritocratic, and deny that this can become so with a capitalist framework. They reject the view that we all compete on equal terms and claim that the children of wealthy and powerful tend to obtain highly rewarding jobs, irrespective of their abilities. The education system disguises this with its myth of meritocracy. Those who are denied success blame themselves and not the system. Their argument is based on studies that are conducted on people with their average IQs. They say that if education was meritocratic they would have similar outcomes; however they found a wide variety of outcomes. Bowles and Ginitis found that those from higher class backgrounds with average IQs did better that low from lower class with similar classes. ...read more.

Conclusion

However, Functionalists such as Durkhiem believe that schools operate on meritocratic principles. They believe that status is achieved on the basis of merit and that it's fair and equal for all. On the other hand Bowles and Gintis reject that education can be meritocratic within a capitalist framework because they believe that class background is the most important factor influencing levels of attainment. Bowles and Gintis also claim those children of the wealthy and powerful have a higher chance of obtaining a better paid job. This rejects the Functionalist view by Parson that everyone has equal chances and this is disguised through the myth of meritocracy. Both groups state that education has different purposes. The Functionalists prospective state that schools transmits society's norms and values. Bowles and Gintis Marxist view states that education's mayor role as the reproduction of labour power. They agree that education transmits norms and values but of the workplace and through the hidden curriculum. I agree and disagree with both views. I agree that a school transmits society's norms and values but I also believe that family and friends also help. I also reject the Functionalists view that school is meritocratic because not everyone has an equal chance and not everyone will achieve the same even if they have the same ability. Children of the ruling class have greater chances. Although Marxists have a better idea but need to take some ideas from Interactionists to get a clearer picture in my belief. Even though this each perspective has its flaws, we can become clearer on the actual contribution of education in society as whole. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    makes the assumption that all pupils start from the same point - a 'level playing field' - when in fact the class system means that some children begin education with the advantage of cultural capital, such advantages come from the socialisation from middle-class parents due to their knowledge of the

  2. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist views on the role of education in ...

    Also Durkheim believes that it is the education system that prepares pupils for adult life, by keeping to rules introduced to obey in school and respecting rules in

  1. The role of education in today's society.

    Education provides pupils with skills for later life. This comes under the ideology of equal opportunity, whereby everybody has the opportunity to succeed.

  2. Assess the claim that the nuclear family as a dominant form of family structure ...

    She voices a passionate plea for the importance of extending respect and support for all family types in order to develop more inclusive societal views as well as family policies that truly foster well-being for individuals and families. As a post modernist, Judith Stacey believes that the family itself cannot

  1. 'Education is a tool of the ruling class'- Discuss.

    Finally, it is criticised for being 'race-blind' and too economistic. The Functionalist perspective is essentially the direct alternative to the statement that 'education is a tool of the working class.' Functionalism sees society as a set of social institutions, which are interdependent upon one another and perform specific tasks that help to produce stability, order and solidarity.

  2. 'The function of education is to reproduce and legitimate social inequality. Discuss.'

    According to the Functionalist approach, the expansion of formal schooling was a precondition for effective economic growth and development of a meritocratic society. Since industrialisation, society has needed to change in order to function, survive and prosper. The education system provides three vital functions in order to meet the needs of industrialised society.

  1. Assess the role of education form the functionalist perspective

    learn that status is to be achieved not ascribed as in the family. Parsons argues that the school acts as a bridge between the family and wider society, that is between childhood and adulthood, where children stop being judged by the particularistic norms of their families and are judged instead universalistic norms of society.

  2. Religion can both be a conservative force and an initiator of social change. To ...

    Maduro argues that the members of the clergy can develop revolutionary potential where oppressed members of the population have no outlet for their grievances. An example of this is in Latin America, which has developed the idea of "Liberation Theology".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work