• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Using the information you've learnt and your own knowledge assess functionalist approaches to the relationship between education and the economy.

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Using the information you've learnt and your own knowledge assess functionalist approaches to the relationship between education and the economy. In the following essay I am going to discuss Functionalist views on education and compare them to Marxist views on how they link to the economy and future job prospects. The essay will explore key ideas in the theory behind functionalism. To fully assess the Functionalist approach on education and economy I need to compare and contrast the ideas to an opposing view of the Marxist. The main theory behind functionalism is that society as a whole evolves around six main aspects and these are as follows : * Government * Religion * Law * Education * Family * Media From these six I am going to focus on Education. One of the functionalists' main views is that education is a meritocracy and a theorist by the name Talcott Parsons concluded this theory. Parsons was an American sociologist writing in the 1950s. He argued that schools act as a focal socialising agency, acting as a bridge between the family and society as a whole, and prepare children for their adult role. ...read more.

Middle

It rewards the most able with better qualifications and therefore better jobs that are functionally more important to society. Bowles and Gintis Marxist view is that the hidden curriculum shapes the future workforce in the following ways. It provides a subservient workforce by penalising creativity, aggressiveness and independence and rewarding perseverance consistency, dependability and punctuality. It also encourages acceptance of hierarchy. Students obey teachers, and this is reflected in the workplace where they obey their employers. At school students are encouraged by external reward just as a workforce in a capitalist society is rewarded by external rewards. School promotes fragmentation of the curriculum, this is reflected in the workplace where different people carry out specific tasks. Further more education makes society feel fair and just. The workers are socialised to believe that equality of opportunity exists and that the system is meritocratic, this is called the legitimisation of inequality. Marxists such as Samuel Bowles and Herbert Gintis would argue that the education system is meritocratic, and deny that this can become so with a capitalist framework. They reject the view that we all compete on equal terms and claim that the children of the wealthy and powerful tend to obtain highly rewarding jobs, irrespective of their abilities. ...read more.

Conclusion

Bowles and Gintis also claim that children of the wealthy and powerful have a higher chance of obtaining a higher and better-paid job. This rejects the Functionalist view by Parson that everyone has equal chances and this is disguised through the myth of meritocracy. Both groups state that education has different purposes. The Functionalists perspective states that schools' transmits society's norms and values. Bowles and Gintis Marxist view states that education's major role as the production of labour power. They agree that education transmits norms and values but of the workplace and through the hidden curriculum. There are elements in both arguments that can be interpreted as being right. I agree that a school transmits societies norms and values but I also believe that family and friends play an important part in transmitting values to the individual. I also reject the Functionalists view that school is meritocratic because not everyone has an equal chance and not everyone will achieve the same even if they have the same ability. Children of the ruling class always have greater chances and opportunities to develop and the structure of society ensures their continued opportunities. Alexander Ford Tutor : Chris Youle ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Work & Leisure section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Work & Leisure essays

  1. Marked by a teacher

    Critically Evaluate the Functionalist Perspective on Education

    5 star(s)

    Through the selection, setting and examinations of the hidden curriculum working-class children are taught to accept failure as their own fault and that the inequalities of wealth are fair. Thus this results in the acceptation of the 'Myth of Meritocracy'.

  2. Marked by a teacher

    Comparison Of Marxist And Functionalist Views On Education

    3 star(s)

    Functionalists see, or stress the need for a meritocratic society, in which people can move freely up and down the occupational hierarchy. As with the Marxist theory on education, Functionalists also look at the economic function. Looking at a pre-industrial society, we find that the range of occupations is low,

  1. Compare and contrast the Marxist and Functionalist views on the role of education in ...

    They believe that it isn't the content of lessons and examinations that is important, but the form that teaching and learning take and the way that schools are organized. The hidden curriculum is what the pupils learn from attending school itself.

  2. Examine sociological explanations of the relationship between education and the economy

    how often does a job require you to know quotes from Shakespeare, some subjects have a limited usefulness to the world of work. The principal of having a general consensus in school is not always the case; different social groups have different sets of values.

  1. Assess Functionalist and Marxist approaches to the relationship between education and economy.

    Hargreaves also noted that schools fail to produce a sense of dignity for working class pupils and therefore fail and may form subcultures, which rejects the values of the school. Hargreave proposed three solutions to the national curriculum. One was for students to follow a field of study where they have a special interest or ability.

  2. Examination of the Functionalist view that schools serve the interests of both society and ...

    the viewpoint that even selection is required within schools with 'support for the hard-working, the inventive and the original'. Parsons therefore, argues that the education system benefits society through effective role selection and allocating people to jobs most suitable to them.

  1. Compare and Contrast functionalist and marxist views on religion

    He has identified two specific areas, religion and life crisis being the first one. This is based around life crises such as birth, death, puberty, that can disrupt general social life.

  2. SOCIAL CLASS DIVISION

    Lads' through a Marxist perspective, therefore other perspective interpretations would very probably produce different conclusions. Interpretivists have made a substantial contribution to a sociological understanding of education.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work