• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the functionalist, conflict and symbolic interactionist theory of stratification?

Extracts from this document...


´╗┐What are the functionalist, conflict and symbolic interactionist theory of stratification? If sociology was defined by Giddens (2011) as the scientific study of human groups and societies and individuals' behaviour in these groups, one could understand why stratification has been caching the sociologists' attention. Sociologically, stratification according to Kemper (1976) is the formation of a certain human society's individuals into layers and dealing with them in different ways according to this classification. Giddens (2011) adds gender, age, religious affliction and military rank as attributer to stratification. Three of the mail classic social theories which are: Functionalism, conflict theory and symbolic interactionism, have a different point of views when shed their lights on these crucial phenomenon according to their varied perspectives. In this paper, I will try to frame the basics of each of these theories respectively and then shed the light on stratification according to its perspective. To start with functionalism which is associated with its pioneers Herbert Spencer and Emile Durkheim. Functionalists did not agree on depending on Charles Darwin's theory of evolution. While the former applied Darwin's law of ?survival of the fittest?, Durkheim rejected it. They saw that individuals interact within the society in a way a certain balance in achieved. Subsequent to the competition between its members, each would gain a certain position in the structure of the system. ...read more.


Max Weber by his side tried not to focus on the economic factors only and related the conflict to the different interests like Marx but he focused more on the ways that the dominant enforce his role on the ruled in terms of different types of authority (Wallas & Wolf 2011). If life is a conflict, there always be 'winner' and ' defeated' persons. This is one of the main reasons for stratification according to conflict theory. In other words it is not that ideal system that results normally. In other words, it is not a competition with fair roles assure the best person in best position. A conflict theorist would reject the idea on the organs works together for the good of all. In such hierarchical systems the upper powers works basically for their own interests ignoring and exploiting the poorer (Carter, 2012). Rather more, the rulers would do whatever it takes to maintain this situation and would with all the power would biased the legislations to their behave in what Marx call it Base-superstructure theory where the base or the means of production, their owners and the production relations would reflect of the surface many institutions like church, education, mass media... etc. All of these institutions work to legislate the base (Baylis, Smith & Owens, 2008). ...read more.


He would add more and more words of standardized Kurdish as a symbol of his concerning about his forbidden language. On the other hand, when Aram goes to the military services, he comes back with many signs of Alawii dialect of vernacular Arabic. Since the Alawiis are the ruler in Syria and most of the high-rank officers belong to this minority with distinctive dialect, using this dialect in the army would provide Aram with a better chance to get less oppression by using the tongue of the rulers. In all of these cases, Aram and other Kurds had maintained a growing identity and a self though symbolic interaction with the others. In all of the choices he would contribute to the his society stratification. Here the stratification was based on the term on ethnicity basically. In conclusion, stratification as variation of individuals in the society and distribution of them into layers, classes and positions is one of the main sociological phenomenon that different social theories has been examining in different approaches. Functionalists' perspective was justificatory in sake of the balance, harmony and good for all of the members. Conflict theorist rejected this idea and tried to define the nature of the ongoing struggle between the haves and have-nots. And the last one, the symbolic interactionalism shifted the focus toward the individuals and their ways in maintaining identities through interacting with others in symbolic ways. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Sociological Differentiation & Stratification essays

  1. Demography topic revision notes. The study of populations and their characteristics is called ...

    As the number of retired people rises, this increases the dependency ratio and the burden on the working population. However, it would be wrong to assume that 'old' necessarily equals 'economically dependent'. Foe example, the age at which people retire can vary - about one in 10 men in their

  2. Religion is more a cause of conflict than of harmony in society(TM)

    There is a lot of evidence to support the Marxist view of the role of religion in society. The caste system of traditional India was justified by Hindu religious beliefs. In medieval Europe, kings and queens ruled by divine right, the Egyptian Pharaohs went one step further by combining both god and king in the same person.

  1. Effectiveness of Perspectives in Social Stratification

    rather than an inbuilt and permanent aspect of society" (Taylor et al, p15) because these differences in interest are "minor compared to the values and interests they have in common." Functionalism is often criticised for assuming that one part of society could not function without another and therefore everyone's actions or positions are determined by another's.

  2. Sociological theories and Healthcare.

    New rights theorists belief is that if we constantly care for these people then we're not taking responsibility for our own needs and those of their families. Reference: Stretch B, BTECH national health studies, (heinmann 2002) Concept of health Task 2 (P2)

  1. Is the Underachievement of Ethnic Minority Children due to a Racist School System?

    I believe that I lead him in any way by using loaded words or leading questions. However my reliability was low because there was no way of conducting another interview and expecting to have the same results. Yet I understood this when I decided to use unstructured interviews, and as

  2. Sociological Theories

    'Stratification' or 'class' as it is otherwise known, is a big aspect of what Marxism is all about and is central to the Marxist theory. Functionalists however, say little about social strata as their members have shared interests. Marxism also provides a radical alternative to the functionalist's view of the nature of social stratification.

  1. Discuss the similarities and differences between conflict of Marxist theories and functionalist theories in ...

    But according to Marxism, social change is revolutionary. It is inflicted by conflict and can be explained by dialectical materialism which means change in the economic mode inflicts social changes. Karl Marx once even said that ?Bloodshed is sometimes necessary for social change.? Functionalism and Marxism also have opposing views on social stratification.

  2. Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society

    This is where an individual places themselves in the position of another person to understand how to act. For example, a student takes on board the role of a teacher when they sit quietly in class so that the teacher can speak.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work