• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What are the key differences between positivism and classicist approaches to crime control? Which should form the focus of crime prevention policy?

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What are the key differences between positivism and classicist approaches to crime control? Which should form the focus of crime prevention policy? Crime can be defined as "an illegal act or omission prohibited and punishable by law."1 Initially definitions of crime may seem clear-cut and uncontroversial, however on closer examination all is not as straightforward as it seems. In The Problem of Crime, Muncie and McLaughlin question the accuracy of dictionary definitions implying that these pose questions rather than providing answers. They suggest "to appreciate fully the complexities of the question, 'what is crime?' we need to broaden our enquiry to include some understanding of criminal law, social mores and social order." In today's society crime is an ever-growing concern for all including ordinary civilians and those in power. Escalating levels of crime indicate that action must be taken to resolve this issue. Theorists in both the social and criminal field have provided answers for causes of crime in order to prevent it and discourage individuals in society who may have the propensity to carry out criminal acts. An analysis of the two leading theories in this field, the positivist and the classicist, focusing on the key differences between the two approaches will assist in concluding on which of the two approaches will succeed in becoming the focus on crime prevention policies. ...read more.

Middle

The idea of reform is completely disregarded, there is also a failure to recognise stigmatisation and a heavy reliance falls on punishment. Fundamental differences can be identified between the two theories. The definition of crime provided is the essence of any crime prevention strategy. The classicists and the positivists disagree on this very basic matter. Beccaria states crime to be 'what violates the social contract, concentrating on the act, rather than the person who performs it.' Lombroso however has argued for a wider definition claiming that legal definitions are restricted and an untrue reflection of true consensual values. Contrasting views of human nature can be found as the classicist view is based on free will. An individual acts solely from a decision, which highlights their self-interest rather than societies. "Man is always responsible for every one of his acts, for the sole reason that he lives in society, and for as long as he does." (Ferri 1928) The positivist theory however rejects the concept of free will, asserting that human nature ultimately depends on individual circumstances. "He who is born with weak social instincts runs more danger of becoming criminal. But the certainty that he will become such does not exist - that depends on the environment." (Bonger 1936) Each human being is subject to their individual nature and circumstances so equality in society is non-existent and free will is restrictive. ...read more.

Conclusion

Positivism clearly favours control and it is a lack of this, which is believed to contribute to the escalating number of crimes. It is evident that both the classicist and the positivist theories play an important part in crime prevention. However for the benefit of the question only one can be successful in becoming the focus of crime prevention policy. The differences between both theories as highlighted above are great in number and equal in importance. The key differences including the definitions of crime, the reasons as to why crime occurs, human nature and proposed solutions. Although the classicism approach may be easier to implement it is not necessarily the best answer. Harsher punishments may not be an effective deterrent. They may in fact have the opposite effect. This theory seems to be obsolete whereas the positivist theory is clearly more understanding for society today. Although it may be more challenging, attempts to reform individuals committing crime should be made rather than severely punishing them. Therefore positivism should ultimately form the focus of crime prevention policy as it holds the stronger argument. 1 Collins Concise Dictionary, Harpercollins Publishers, 5th edition, 2001 2 Criminal Justice One, Lecture 4, 'Classicism and Positivism', Darke, Sacha, 2004 3 Snipes, B, Jeffrey, Theoretical Criminology, Oxford University Press, 5th ed, 2002 4 Theoretical Criminology, Vold, B, George, Oxford University Press, 2002, p27 5 Researching Crime and Criminal Justice, Sapsford, R, The Open University, p269 6 Article from lecture supplementary booklet, tutorial 4 Sannia Hussain 03147328 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Deviant careers can be studied sociologically like any other career. People are socialised into new "occupational" roles and encouraged, both materially and psychologically, to engage in deviant behaviour. The concept of a deviant career emphasises that there is a progression through deviance: Deviants are recruited, given or denied rewards, and promoted or demoted.

  2. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    It soon became clear that not all offenders would fit the initial theory. They were not homogeneous and differences occurred between them and the different crimes they committed. This led Lombroso to sub divide the criminal population into types of offender.

  1. Examine the differences between Muslims living in the UK and Muslims living in Saudi ...

    Both sexes follow the same curriculum and take the same annual examinations. This segregation of the sexes is appropriate. I say this because practising Muslims of older age (14+) need to be separate form the opposite sex, so as to stop their desires against females and follow their religion properly.

  2. Assess the right realist view that crime is the result of biological rational factors ...

    On both sides of the Atlantic, New right conservative governments came to power, led by Margaret Thatcher in the UK and Ronald Regan in the US. These policies include people should pay less tax, and the welfare state should go and people should take responsibility for them.

  1. Outline and Assess Sociological Approaches to Social Control Within Crime and Deviance

    However, the HM Prison Service assures the public that the HM Chief Inspectorate of Prisons inspects private prisons in the same way as public sector prisons. However, other sociologists have suggested different elements of contemporary social control. Feeley and Simon call this term actuarialism, and it stems from the insurance

  2. Explain crime

    Instead what Morris (1957) suggested, was that the concentration of delinquents was the result of the council's policy of housing problem families together. These estates had the lowest rents so the poorest tended to choose them. The outcome was those people who were likely to become delinquent were housed in the same area.

  1. subcultural theory

    However, even though they were denied legitimate means of achieving status, young working class males still desired it. This led to "Status frustration", in that they were frustrated and unhappy about their low status in society. Unlike Merton's suggestion that they would now turn to criminal paths to success, they

  2. This paper attempts to analyse Bacceria's (1764) "On Crimes and Punishment" article. In order ...

    He further argued that capital punishment should be abolished and replaced by imprisonment as it "is not authorized by any right... it is neither necessary nor useful (Beccaria 1764:10)".

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work