• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What can be learned about the extent of crime from official

Extracts from this document...


What can be learned about the extent of crime from official statistics? In order to enlighten the general public and policy makers about the extent of crime, the crime dilemma itself must first be measured. Therefore it can be seen, that the research carried out towards crime is a fundamental subject in itself. There are a diversity of methods used in order to study the extent of crime, such methods include; statistics, surveys, questionnaires, biographies, interviews etc... The research methods used can be both quantitative and qualitative. There are two primary sources of data used in order to assist the general public in learning about the extent of crime; these are generally termed 'official' and 'unofficial statistics'. However, the objectives of these methods are similar but the findings from them are generally not. Official statistics are those published by the central Government. This source of statistical information informs the general public about the extent of 'notifiable offences'. Official statistics are easy and cheap to access as you can observe them on the Home Office web page. The second source of statistical information comes from the British Crime Survey (BCS). These statistics are 'unofficial' and the procedures used to gather information are completely different to the first, as the statistical data comes from surveys carried out by the public themselves. ...read more.


They have altered some notifiable offences to summary offences, for instance 'criminal damage of �20 or less was not counted before 1997, but is now notifiable' Therefore, this led to a '7%' increase in recorded crimes (Jones, 2003; 52). Such figures are then disingenuous when comparing one year to another, in this case it would mislead the public in believing that criminal offences have rose by 7% as they do not explain such changes in the published official statistics. There is also a problematic issue with the counting of criminal offences. The way in they are counted has changed several times over the past years. The method used for counting criminal offences used to be a complicated one 'if several offences were committed in one incident, only the most serious would be counted unless the offences were of violent or sexual nature' (Jones, 20003; 53). This then led to problems with misinterpretation as many police forces looked at it differently. Due to this the counting rules were amended again in 1998 where one crime was recorded per victim. This then led to an immense increase of '7%' in recorded crime rates, in effect making the extent of crime appear much higher (Williams, 2004, cited in Simmons 2001; 45). ...read more.


What can actually be learned about the extent of crime in Britain from the official crime statistics is much distorted. Not only do they give a distorted figure of the extent of crime the information provided from them is also very vague. They do not provide information on the number of crimes solved, who is sent to prison, and who commits crimes. As Williams (2004) points out: "The more involved the incident becomes with the criminal justice system, the less representative it is of the offence" (Williams, 2004; 85). They also give an inaccurate representation of the actual crime levels as not all crimes are reported and not all them reported are recorded. They also only include information about 'noifiable offences', subsequently more than half of the crimes taken place are not incorporated in the official crime statistics. How can statistical information be relied upon when it does not give a true representation? Is there an essential value of official statistics? Critics would say no to these questions, as some see the official crime statistics as been totally 'useless'. However in comparison to other forms of crime research methods, it seems to be that they all have there uses and drawbacks. In order to balance the probabilities of such research methods being more accurate, maybe one must consider using all the research methods in a grouping format. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. How Accurate are Official Crime Statistics?

    Is there an accurate way of measuring crime levels? There are two other methods that may be used as an alternative to official crime statistics; firstly self-report studies, these are like a questionnaire, which are given to individuals, who tick next to the crimes they have committed.

  2. Criminal Investigation Procedures

    We began the interview insuring the suspect was not under arrest however he still needed to cautioned. We applied the health and safety guidelines making sure the suspect needed no assistance with the interview and ensuring the suspect that the suspect could stop the interview at any time.

  1. Does the media heighten fear of crime?

    The media displays violent crime in disproportion to the other more minor crimes to which they proportionately neglect. In addition, theres is also distortion in relation to the profiling of offenders in the media. Ultlimately causing a misunderstanding of crime and offending behaviour.

  2. "What can be learned about crime by studying theofficial statistics?"

    They include the number of crimes recorded by police, the number of crimes solved, who was sent to prison, who commits a specific crime, and who the victims of crime are. Official crime statistics are generally a relatively cheap way of gaining information concerning crimes due to their easy accessibility.

  1. Inequalities within the 'Criminal JUSTICE System/Process'

    * The presence of discretion in the CJS. 'The crime problem'. Box (1983 p17) argues that: 'The majority of people are continually exposed to a portrait of crime in which the background consists of murder, rape, robbery and theft, and the foreground is full of characters mainly drawn from the poor, disorganised, lower class neighbourhoods.

  2. "Deviance is normal" - In what sense is this true?

    as an expression of a capitalist class" (pg 483 Soc in Focus) The empathies of the Marxist view point is that crime occurs because of coercion and conflict and class struggle. Where as in contrast to this a Functionlist prospective places the emphasis on that members of society should be

  1. Official Crime Statistics Analysis

    Self-report studies > Respondents are asked if they have committed a crime within the past year. > Cross-sectional > Types of crimes committed. Evaluation (+) Bilton et al (1997): studies reveal that 50-90% of people admit to illegal behaviour which may of resulted in a court appearance.

  2. Using the example of violent crime show the strengths and weaknesses of police recorded ...

    useful assessment of the gap between crimes committed and their recording by the police" (Comparing BCS estimates and police counts of crime 2004 p3). Therefore, it could be assumed that the government has recognised the limits of crime statistics and are formulating policies to rectify this.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work