• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What contribution has Labelling Theory made to our understanding of crime and deviancy and what are the policy implications of

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What contribution has Labelling Theory made to our understanding of crime and deviancy and what are the policy implications of its argument? We can call a label, or define it as; a mark, name, or even badge. Something is only deviant, or becomes deviant because someone has been successful in labelling it as, deviancy is ambiguous, definitions differ from society to society or even culture to culture. Calling something deviant is a reaction to a type of behaviour. The labelling theory is very complex, it asks why some people committing crimes are named deviant but others are not. Labelling theorists believe when you label offenders as criminals, yobs, this has negative consequences, deepening and worsening the criminal behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

The effects on the Individual of labelling are especially important. Having being labelled, as a deviant, the individual according to Becker, then will accept the label, and for example turn to the life of crime, possibly with the help of a deviant subculture, feeling they have no other alternative. The last part of the labelling theory is,' deviant career', this being when the labelled criminal evolves into a complete, absolute deviant. Kai T Erikson (1966) also highlights the way social reaction affects the individual, he supports and reinforces what Becker suggests, he further suggests that deviance in a society is essential, and is beneficial for creating a boundary between good and evil. Furthermore there are a number of policy implications to do with the labelling theory, a vast majority of them are impractical, such as the ...read more.

Conclusion

Labelling theory helps us make sense of crime and deviancy, but it doesn't explain serious offending well, it tends to ignore those serious offences, hence cannot be applied universally. Also it assumes that those labelled do not want the label, whereas a number do, such as terrorists for example who strive for the label. In conclusion labelling theory proposed by Becker (1963) suggests that no behaviour is deviant, criminal, until it is defined or labelled as. By labelling someone, this can be seen to influence actions. As stated before there are many policy implications including, prosecution as a last resort, also law intruding into peoples lives as little as possible. Labelling theory has become a dominant approach in the explanation of crime and deviance, therefore has aided our understanding of the subject greatly, with both positive and negative aspects. WORD COUNT - 542 ?? ?? ?? ?? Ema Olivea K0425678 MODULE CODE CM1118 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    The scientists argued that their fields of study and expertise could account for individual differences with regards to why crime was committed. They did not believe that everyone was the same and should be dealt with on a fixed punishment system.

  2. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    If certain groups are labelled as deviant they will take on the role of the self-filling prophecy, this is when the person or group labelled as deviant carries on committing deviance but also accepts the label, thus proving to friends, family and society as a whole that they are achieving what their label exclaims.

  1. Why are women less inclined towards deviancy and crime than men?

    (Haralambos & Holborn; 1995:442) Hagan (1979) suggest that the strongest forms of control are the informal ones used at home, and that this could explain women's lesser involvement in crime. (Jones; 2000:88) Frances Heidensohn (1996) suggests similar views. She argues that male-dominated patriarchal societies control women more effectively than they

  2. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    When looking at the terrain of France, the relative occurrence of rape is 32% in mountainous areas compared to 70% on level plain, since the latter has a greater population density with a more built up environment meaning greater opportunity for the criminal act to occur in.

  1. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    Most prominent being that it fails to explain why people commit crimes and completely neglects power and social structure and therefore cannot explain why certain types of people are regularly and repeatedly identified as criminal or deviant, although labelling theorists claim to provide a voice for those who are labelled as deviant and are' outsiders' or the 'underdog'.

  2. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    However, this is no the case, they in fact employ what Matza labels 'techniques of neutralisation'. These are arguments which they use in order to justify their actions and get themselves out of trouble such as saying the deviant act was an accident or pointing out that no one got hurt.

  1. Critically Evaluate The Contribution Made By Subcultural Sociologists In Understanding Crime & Deviance

    Rather the response, or modes of adaptation, depends on the individual's attitudes toward cultural goals. Conformity is the most common mode of adaptation. Individuals accept both the goals as well as the prescribed means for achieving those goals and simply downscale their goals in order to achieve them.

  2. subcultural theory

    then they would seek alternative and deviant ways of achieving what they wanted. Merton used Durkheim's concept of "Anomie" to describe this situation. However, for Merton the concept of anomie meant a discontinuity between cultural goals and the legitimate means available for reaching them.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work