• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What contribution has Labelling Theory made to our understanding of crime and deviancy and what are the policy implications of

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What contribution has Labelling Theory made to our understanding of crime and deviancy and what are the policy implications of its argument? We can call a label, or define it as; a mark, name, or even badge. Something is only deviant, or becomes deviant because someone has been successful in labelling it as, deviancy is ambiguous, definitions differ from society to society or even culture to culture. Calling something deviant is a reaction to a type of behaviour. The labelling theory is very complex, it asks why some people committing crimes are named deviant but others are not. Labelling theorists believe when you label offenders as criminals, yobs, this has negative consequences, deepening and worsening the criminal behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

The effects on the Individual of labelling are especially important. Having being labelled, as a deviant, the individual according to Becker, then will accept the label, and for example turn to the life of crime, possibly with the help of a deviant subculture, feeling they have no other alternative. The last part of the labelling theory is,' deviant career', this being when the labelled criminal evolves into a complete, absolute deviant. Kai T Erikson (1966) also highlights the way social reaction affects the individual, he supports and reinforces what Becker suggests, he further suggests that deviance in a society is essential, and is beneficial for creating a boundary between good and evil. Furthermore there are a number of policy implications to do with the labelling theory, a vast majority of them are impractical, such as the ...read more.

Conclusion

Labelling theory helps us make sense of crime and deviancy, but it doesn't explain serious offending well, it tends to ignore those serious offences, hence cannot be applied universally. Also it assumes that those labelled do not want the label, whereas a number do, such as terrorists for example who strive for the label. In conclusion labelling theory proposed by Becker (1963) suggests that no behaviour is deviant, criminal, until it is defined or labelled as. By labelling someone, this can be seen to influence actions. As stated before there are many policy implications including, prosecution as a last resort, also law intruding into peoples lives as little as possible. Labelling theory has become a dominant approach in the explanation of crime and deviance, therefore has aided our understanding of the subject greatly, with both positive and negative aspects. WORD COUNT - 542 ?? ?? ?? ?? Ema Olivea K0425678 MODULE CODE CM1118 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Assess The Contribution Of Control Theory To Our Understanding Of Crime And Criminality

    as that of the classical school came down to us as a political science rather than a behavioural science. The nineteenth century saw the development of the biological and medical sciences and the scientists clashed with the classical school of thought.

  2. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    Furthermore, working with Malinowski, Becker's 'The Outsiders' provides a very clear illustration of the labelling theory applied to the idea of crime and deviance. Malinowski describes how a youth killed himself when he had become publically accused of incest. Malinowski first inquired about the case, and found that the Islanders,

  1. Why are women less inclined towards deviancy and crime than men?

    (Haralambos & Holborn; 1995:442) Hagan (1979) suggest that the strongest forms of control are the informal ones used at home, and that this could explain women's lesser involvement in crime. (Jones; 2000:88) Frances Heidensohn (1996) suggests similar views. She argues that male-dominated patriarchal societies control women more effectively than they

  2. Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    He argued that the way in which the police perceived the two different classes of juveniles heavily influenced the action taken in regards to the crimes that they had committed. The difference between primary and secondary deviance was distinguished between Lemert (1972)

  1. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    The conflict subculture, this subculture tends to develop in areas in which there is great economic success where illegitimate opportunity structure does not exist. These areas tend to have a high turnover of population and a low level of social unity; this disables established patterns of adult crime developing.

  2. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    These values are however also held widely by the rest of society. The only difference being whereas most of society expresses these values through non-criminal activity such as sport some individuals, especially adolescent males, slip into delinquent behaviour in order to achieve their 'thrills'.

  1. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    deviant Here a 'secret deviant' is one breaking the rules, but their acts go unnoticed and therefore they see their action as non-problematic. However, an extreme case of the problem of a deviant act being made aware can be demonstrated in a case study cited in Becker from the Trobriand

  2. 2 Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    This has encouraged men to accept that women are equals and not just mothers and housewives. The decline of the close-knit extended family and greater mobility socially and geographically. This has made it easier for couples to adopt new roles in their relationships as there is less pressure from their kin to keep traditional roles.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work