• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What contribution has Labelling Theory made to our understanding of crime and deviancy and what are the policy implications of

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

What contribution has Labelling Theory made to our understanding of crime and deviancy and what are the policy implications of its argument? We can call a label, or define it as; a mark, name, or even badge. Something is only deviant, or becomes deviant because someone has been successful in labelling it as, deviancy is ambiguous, definitions differ from society to society or even culture to culture. Calling something deviant is a reaction to a type of behaviour. The labelling theory is very complex, it asks why some people committing crimes are named deviant but others are not. Labelling theorists believe when you label offenders as criminals, yobs, this has negative consequences, deepening and worsening the criminal behaviour. ...read more.

Middle

The effects on the Individual of labelling are especially important. Having being labelled, as a deviant, the individual according to Becker, then will accept the label, and for example turn to the life of crime, possibly with the help of a deviant subculture, feeling they have no other alternative. The last part of the labelling theory is,' deviant career', this being when the labelled criminal evolves into a complete, absolute deviant. Kai T Erikson (1966) also highlights the way social reaction affects the individual, he supports and reinforces what Becker suggests, he further suggests that deviance in a society is essential, and is beneficial for creating a boundary between good and evil. Furthermore there are a number of policy implications to do with the labelling theory, a vast majority of them are impractical, such as the ...read more.

Conclusion

Labelling theory helps us make sense of crime and deviancy, but it doesn't explain serious offending well, it tends to ignore those serious offences, hence cannot be applied universally. Also it assumes that those labelled do not want the label, whereas a number do, such as terrorists for example who strive for the label. In conclusion labelling theory proposed by Becker (1963) suggests that no behaviour is deviant, criminal, until it is defined or labelled as. By labelling someone, this can be seen to influence actions. As stated before there are many policy implications including, prosecution as a last resort, also law intruding into peoples lives as little as possible. Labelling theory has become a dominant approach in the explanation of crime and deviance, therefore has aided our understanding of the subject greatly, with both positive and negative aspects. WORD COUNT - 542 ?? ?? ?? ?? Ema Olivea K0425678 MODULE CODE CM1118 1 ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Critically assess the contribution of labelling theory to an understanding of crime and deviance

    These values are however also held widely by the rest of society. The only difference being whereas most of society expresses these values through non-criminal activity such as sport some individuals, especially adolescent males, slip into delinquent behaviour in order to achieve their 'thrills'.

  2. 2 Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    Female partner's earnings now have more importance in helping to maintain a high standard of living, this may have encouraged men to help more with household duties. 'The New Man' is said to have integrated conjugal roles when it comes to housework.

  1. Critically evaluate the contribution that the Labelling theory has made to our understanding of ...

    Most prominent being that it fails to explain why people commit crimes and completely neglects power and social structure and therefore cannot explain why certain types of people are regularly and repeatedly identified as criminal or deviant, although labelling theorists claim to provide a voice for those who are labelled as deviant and are' outsiders' or the 'underdog'.

  2. Free essay

    Assess the view that crime and deviance is the result of labelling, the media ...

    The third and final subculture is the retreatist one with members thought too be double failures. These people failed to achieve success in mainstream society and other subcultures so turn within themselves to drugs and alcohol. While they agree with Cohen that delinquent subcultures are the source of much deviance,

  1. Compare and evaluate Subcultural theory and labelling theory

    Cloward and Ohlin (1961), argue that Merton and Cohen fail to explain why some subcultures have different norms and values, why do some only have their main concern as theft and others main concerns are violence, they developed the ideology that it depends on what social setting they have grown up in.

  2. Examine critically the contribution of labelling theory to our understanding of deviance.

    A phenomenological approach of understanding how law-enforcers interpret what they see come from Cicourel (1968) he suggested the labels which they attached were heavily affected by their subjective perceptions and stereotypes, and how these led to the social construction of crime statistics.

  1. subcultural theory

    then they would seek alternative and deviant ways of achieving what they wanted. Merton used Durkheim's concept of "Anomie" to describe this situation. However, for Merton the concept of anomie meant a discontinuity between cultural goals and the legitimate means available for reaching them.

  2. What have theories of deviance added to our understanding of crime? Why are there ...

    They see deviance more as a collective endeavour than the adaptation of an individual, and also suggest that deviants may blame the system rather than themselves for their actions. Interestingly this all seems to contradict Downes' (1995) view that deviants are segregated and "rarely engage in collective efforts" to interpret their behaviour, doing rather than thinking about their actions.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work