• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

What do the Pluralists say about the media generally?

Extracts from this document...


Pluralism represents another view of how the media function in society. In the US in the 1930s it derived out of dissatisfaction with mass society theory and the views of the Frankfurt School. Theories developed about the same time. The contrast between Pluralist models and Marxist is important to history and dep't of media studies. Spirited arguments in the past LP - It's a bit more difficult to pin down than Marxist theories - more diffuse, but many of the views and principles of pluralism find support with media professionals/journalists - they believe that this is how the media operate - often go back to ideas of freedom of the press upto free market models which were pushed in the 1980s, particularly for broadcasting - no govt intervention - let the market and the paying public decide. But pluralist models are more difficult to pin down because they are less explicit about their concept of society, but they aren't necessarily theoretical i.e. does have theoretical elements. Essentially can be seen like this in relation to dominance/Marxist models: News Sources - competing interests v ruling class or dominant elite Media - many, independent and competing media v concentrated ownership & uniform product Production - creative/original/free v standardised/routinised/controlled Content & Worldview - Diverse and competing, responsive ...read more.


They are also powerful because they set the agenda of what is covered in debate. We are dependent on the media and some media potentially have more power than others e.g. television news which is respected as a truthful source of information. Pluralists argue that modern society has produced discriminating cultural consumers. People are more literate, more aware of what's going on in the world, and class distinctions are now less important in influencing individual choice. People can choose from a wide range of options, and the WC are just as likely to watch Panorama as anyone else, while soap operas are watched by all. To support these arguments pluralists point to the way high culture now reaches a mass audience e.g. opera on TV. They point to the greater affluence of people where they have the money to buy a range of media products. The individual simply has the freedom to make his or her choice based on personal preference. CONCLUSION So on the surface we have very opposing views from the Marxists and Pluralists, but in fact they aren't so incompatible: The perceived differences between Marxist and Pluralist theories are no longer so clear cut. ...read more.


The differences between the two approaches are partly a result of misunderstanding and partly a result of the tendency of both traditions to study the mass media in different contexts. This is a consequence of their differing ideological and theoretical preoccupations. Summary Generally pluralists give media varying degrees of independence or autonomy with regard to other institutions like the state, political parties - and in their production of media content. But also underline dependence - e.g. state depends on mass media to propagate its information and mass media depend on state to provide this information. Pluralist approaches believe the media are not controlled by a few but represent a multiplicity of sources and a diversity of messages. They also believe that the media are only one force or influence in society - there are other influences too which can overrule any independent effect the media might have. According to the pluralist view of the world the established order is not fixed. Institutions and groups compete for power, and power in society is diffused/spread out. It isn't concentrated in the hands of a few. Through the competition of ideas, gradual change can take place. In contrast Marxist analysis emphasizes the established and fixed nature of the distribution of power - which is centered within a few institutions. Both pluralist and Marxist Positions are derived from an understanding of the nature of power and its distribution. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Media section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Media essays

  1. To what extent do media representations of refugees and asylum seekers limit their integration ...

    a racially motivated incident was considerably higher for members of minority ethnic groups than for White people (Office of National Statistics). The highest risk was for Pakistani and Bangladeshi people at 4.2 per cent, this compared with 0.3 per cent for White people (figure 1).

  2. Censorship in school media.

    Sarah Betsy Fuller, author of the Hazelwood v. Kuhlmeier, also states that the Spectrum staff "intended to explore the issues from various perspectives, including statistics about teenage pregnancy; personal accounts of three pregnant Hazelwood East students; the difficulties of teenage marriage; teenage divorce rates; the impact of divorce on children; the reasons teenagers run away from home; juvenile

  1. Are we influenced by TV and film? Briefly discuss the evidence and arguments for ...

    Sociologists began to take an interest in youths when subcultures emerged after the Second World War. As these young people became more affluent they began to develop their own distinctive ideas on dress, music and behaviour. They gathered in similar places, for example bikers usually meet at race meetings, where as ravers meet at dance clubs, and have shared values.

  2. How does the media represent female bodies?

    This was not possible. Content analysis is quicker, cheaper and if carried out with care, can provide useful data. I also thought it was the most ethical and appropriate method to use. Content analysis can be used to present an objective, quantified, account of events, themes, and issues which may not be apparent to a reader.

  1. Ethics in the Media

    As you can see through this small excerpt, Mike Barnicle obviously took his column from George Carlin's book, even though Barnicle claims to have never read Carlin's book. This wasn't the end to Barnicle's unethical ways. In1995 Barnicle wrote a piece about two families with a child at Children's Hospital.

  2. The function of Education is to develop and reinforce social solidarity.

    If these two processes were perfect then society would become static and unchanging, and in reality this is unlikely to occur for long. Parsons recognizes this, stating that he treats "the structure of the system as problematic and subject to change" and that his concept of the tendency towards equilibrium "does not imply the empirical dominance of stability over change".

  1. Why do the mass media in a capitalist society allow no genuine diversity and ...

    On the other hand, men are usually depicted in high status roles, characterized by authoritative, managerial, superior, powerful and successful relative to women. Moreover, the role of women and men are mostly linked to domestic sphere and public sphere respectively.

  2. Assess the pluralist view of media ownership

    DAVIES argues journalists have become ?churnalists?, i.e. processors of unchecked information, who are not interested in the content as much as profit due to commercial pressure. However, Marxists argue the media owners have direct control over editors and indirect control over journalists by having the power to hire and fire,

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work