• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

When attempting to explain the question of what is crime?

Extracts from this document...


TMA7 X3112220 When attempting to explain the question of what is crime? Two predominate theories emerge, that of a structural explanation and that of an agency. These theories form one of the fundamental debates in Social Science and each offers its own perspective on how free individuals are to act as they chose with out social intervention. As such in this essay I intend to illustrate the key points of each explanation and in turn highlight key methods of evidence used to support them. Those who would describe crime with the foundation on social structures, focus on the collective influences, which drive individuals to behave or conform in certain manners. These structures can vary from an individual's family background and genetics to their cultural surroundings and beliefs. Even with in this one branch of explanation there may be several contrasting opinions. ...read more.


With out the claims could be thought of as speculation and could be considered less reliable. Evidence can be produced from a many different research methods. They may take the form of interviews, participant or non- participant observation, questionnaires, case studies, or even experiments. Evidence in social science is vitally important as it can on occasion provide the basis for an opinion or argument as well as provide support for a previously formed idea or opinion. For example David Farrington supported the theory that a persons family can propel them into crime. He used longitudinal studies as a primary method of evidence, which proved to be most effective. The studies focused on several individuals' family circumstances and the criminal behaviour they displayed. He found using these studies that a strong pattern emerged between those who shared similar "problem family" situations and those who committed criminal acts. ...read more.


justifies the ends (i.e. stolen goods). As with the structural opinion this theory can only be considered relative if there is evidence to support the claims. Open questioned interviews with criminals and observation methods are key approaches when trying to compile evidence for the rational choice theory. This is because they ask or observes first hand why criminals commit crime. Again these are qualitative methods of research but the findings can be used to draw out statistical or quantitative evidence if required. Quantitative methods of research are useful when bring information together as it tends to be easier to draw conclusions and percentile information from. X3112220 As you can see although there are many proposed theories for why people turn to or commit crime no one explanation can offer a concrete answer. Nevertheless if supported with credible evidence and equitable research two fundamentally different theories can be considered to provide plausible explanation. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our AS and A Level Crime & Deviance section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related AS and A Level Crime & Deviance essays

  1. Sociological Theories on Crime and Deviance

    Groups such as workers have clear goals, such as better pay and organisations such as trade unions to pressure employers and politicians. Thus they have no need to resort to violence to achieve such goals. Contrastingly unemployed youth are marginalised.

  2. The following essay will explore the question; What is the relationship between policing governance ...

    The accountability of individual police in America is a fundamental issue for police executives in America. American police executives are expected to give high priority to ensuring accountability as this is seen as a reflection of their professional commitment. Compared with the USA a key omitted feature in the UK is local democracy.

  1. Do people choose to commit crime or are they propelled in to criminal activity?'

    Punishment is made in order to deter people from committing crime and it should be greater than the pleasure of criminal gains. Classical theory emphasized a legal definition of crime rather than what defined criminal behaviour. The Declaration of Independence and the US Constitution reflect the Classical movement, thus the law of today is classical in nature.

  2. Forensic Science

    In manslaughter, there is no desire required. For voluntary manslaughter, it must be killing with intent to kill or inflict grievous bodily injury but under the influence if passion caused by a sufficient amount of provoking. In involuntary manslaughter, it is a casual or reckless homicide and is killing in the course of committing a dangerous misdemeanor.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work