comparison of still life with a skull (1671) by Phillipe de campaigne and Mortality and Immortality (1876) by William Harnett.

Authors Avatar

The paintings I will be comparing are still life with a skull (1671) by Phillipe de campaigne and Mortality and Immortality (1876) by William Harnett.

Still life with a skull

1671

Oil on canvas

Phillipe de Campaigne

Mortality and Immortality

1876

oil on canvas

William harnett

First impressions:

When I first look at Champaigne’s piece of work, I see the skull dominating the centre of the image, looking at me. The image makes me think about death, as the skull seems to be watching the viewer – awaiting their death. What is strange however is the flower beside the skull.

Harnett’s painting howevr is somewhat different; at first sight, I see more to the image than just a skull.

Basic elements:

The colours used in both paintings however are quite similar in that darker hues are used to create a dark ‘deathly’ atmoshphere.  The colours used in harnett’s painting are slightly warmer than Champaigne’s painting; both however used contrasting hues to create visually striking depictions. The light has been effectively exploited to aid in this.

The texture of Campaigne’s painting seems quite rough whilst Harnett’s seems smoother, this is because the way the paints have been used in Harnett’s work create a smoother feel.

Join now!

Content:

In Campaigne’s painting, there is a skull dominating the image, with a flower to its left and sand timer to its right. Its as if Campaigne wanted to encapsulate life and death within the very same image by having a flower symbolising life whilst having the skull to symbolising death. The timer could possibly  be suggesting time is running out and you will die next. 

Harnett’s image however gives us a clue as to what it is about, because eof its tilte; Mortality and immortality . The books and the violin maybe suggest immortality and human pleasures whilst ...

This is a preview of the whole essay