"The Renaissance Is An Important Landmark In The History Of Art, But In Other Respects It's Significance Is Negligible." Discuss.

“Anamorphous, metalepsis, dissonance, and infinite regress, among many other devices, were used to shock, disorient, and ultimately overwhelm the senses of the spectator, reader, or listener” (Synder).

        Now I will move on to the another important part of the Renaissance, intellectualism and its rebirth. Medieval Classicalism had never been forgotten by the mass of Italian Absolute states and Romanesque ideas still remained in architecture, language and literature before the Renaissance. However this was nothing compared to the revival found in the fourteenth and fifteenth centuries. Originating from such works such as Dante’s ‘Divine Comedy’, Italians began to see themselves as the most natural source of resurgence of the era where they ruled the world accompanied with a persistence to resurrect classicalism.

        This revival was centred around the education and regrouping of Humanism. Whereas Atheism was morally based on what was right and wrong, Humanists used to denote Roman concept in ideal suppositions of wisdom and knowledge. By studying classic works this wisdom could be acquired. It told man to work with god and not disown him. The development of Humanism was in the huge search of documents and the teaching of Greek all of which is mainly attributed to the poet Petrarchand mainly known as the Carolingian Renaissance .These times, as always, were glorified in books buildings and art, such as that of Bruni and his work in assessing the day to day life of the Florentine people in ‘The History of Florence’.

        The Universal Man was a bi-product of the search of Humanism. He who was a Universal man would be of all the sciences.  The gentry folk of the period would strive to have wisdom and become virtuous so they would be a rounded individual and in turn would become famous. As before fame was usually graced upon the deceased, the rich individuals and families wanted to show everyone that they were important; often going to the extremes of producing artworks and medals of themselves to be circulated.

“Having heard the whispers of imagination and desire from those who praised the artists and scholars they searched for their own following” (Hale)

        Under most circumstances Leonardo Da Vinci was seen as the perfect example of the universal man. He encroached in all aspects of the intellectual being. Famous for the Mona Lisa and that smile people yet ignore the way he deals with the geology of the background in that and in most of his early works, the most famous being ‘Virgin of the Rocks’. His depth and vision were amazing as he delved into mathematics such as the platonic solids, exploring the underlying forms of reason. He even studied meteorology and nature while finding the time to come up with technological innovations such as his simple designs for a Helicopter. In his time he was definitely the Universal man, using his reason and experience in his work to show human emotion whether it was maternal or an expression of anger.

         Here we see another significant change in this period outside of the art world; the impact of this learning upon the church. As Humanism moved north it became more concentrated on the study of the bible rather as opposed to the classical works. With the invention of the printing press in the mid fifteenth century new ideas were able to spread thousands of times more quickly and both Church and State found it much harder to control the spread of ideas after this period.

        Humanism was not anti religion, humanist thinkers wanted to investigate the creation of humans, not to undermine god but understand his greater role. This led to a greater study of the bible and other related works such as the position of Platonism. The findings could easily be spread as a result of the printing press. New ideas and challenges came to the position of the church and again they were not attacking but testing religious believe. Foremost there was Petrach and his view of just praying to the gods instead of the saints and his questioning of the power of relics. This was followed by Lorenzo Valla who argued that we were too weak to get into heaven by leading Christian lives so we should rely on divine mercy and his denouncement of the Donation of Constantine.

        The most prolific of all Humanist Christians was Erasmus. A reformer but not a protestant, as he never left the church, he translated the bible in it’s current Latin form and undermined the church edition, not with his writings but the simple word to word translation. He and others referred back to ancient Hebrew and Arabic and found wrongdoings in the current bible which would have disastrous effects on the church in later years. The Renaissance created a melting pot of ideas. The issues of the translated bible had occurred in the past but the Renaissance brought new ideas and intelligence to the debate. The Reformation was a result of the Renaissance but not the result.  

        Another dimension of the Renaissance era, as before mentioned, was the effect it had on commerce in Italy and in the rest of Europe. As Charles Burney, the historian of music put it,

“All the arts seem to have been the companions, if not the produce of successful commerce…that is, like commerce, they will be found, upon enquiry, to have appeared first in Italy; then in the Hanseatic towns; next in the Netherlands”

        Many other social theorists agreed with this view, particularly the Scottish. Adam Ferguson noted that the progress of fine arts had generally made a huge part in the history of prosperous nations while John Millar pointed out that Florence led the way in manufacturing as well as in the arts. In addition Adam Smith planned to write a book about the relationship between the arts and sciences and society in general in which it was very likely – as in his wealth of nations – the city states of Italy would have played a prominent part.

         At as first glance the contemporary Historian would immediately dismiss the claim that in other respects, outside of art, the Renaissance contribution was negligible. Although it is obvious that the artistry of this period is exclusive and at the forefront of most people’s mind, to neglect the various cultural, social and economic aspects of it is a grave mistake in the historical context. The Renaissance was the catalyst for the Reformation, which is ultimately important in revising the impact of religion and its consequences in the last few centuries. Socially it could be said that the renaissance exported the ways and means of education and provided the world with the forbearing university system. Economically, the expansion of commerce brought the beginning of modern day trading and is noted for being responsible for such endeavours as Marco Polo’ expeditions and the discovery of the Americas.

Bibliography

The Italian Renaissance: Culture and Society in Italy, Peter Burke, Polity Press.

Early Modern Italy, John A. Marino, Oxford University Press.

1776-89, Charles Burney, Vol. 2, Oxford.