• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Are scholars justified in using the term 'Golden Age' to describe the economic history of Western Europe during the period between 1950 to 1973

Extracts from this document...


Are scholars justified in using the term 'Golden Age' to describe the economic history of Western Europe during the period between 1950 to 1973? 'Nothing in the history of Western Europe resembles its experience between 1945 and 1968.' Milward, European rescue, pg. 21 In the quarter of a century that followed the Second World War, the achievements of the European economy were so impressive that the period was often referred to as the 'Golden Age'. Since 1913 Europe had experienced two world wars plus the great depression and trade wars of the 1930's, the economy had been stunted and growth was well below trend. In the early post-war years between 1945 and 1947 recovery was frustrated by shortages of food, labour, raw materials and the need to reastablish both financial and political institutions. However this gave Europe a clean slate so to speak and the opportunity for rapid growth through the correction of previous mistakes. Between 1950 and 1973, the real GDP of western Europe grew more than twice as fast as the secular trend, fluctuations in this growth were mild and inflation rates were seen as socially acceptable. But more importantly in the long run, 'by the end of this period the perpetual possibility of serious economic hardship, which had earlier always hovered over the lives of three-quarters of the population now menaced only about one-fifth of it.' ...read more.


In this sense the breaking point was brought about in 1973, not just by the quadrupling of the price in oil but also by the world economic boom which preceded it and drove prices up in all industrial countries across the world. The question economists wanted to know was no more, how long? But rather, why? Ever since it became clear the forecasting of the post war economy, based on previous trends, did not reflect the reality presented by the 'Golden Age', economists started their search for reasons why? Work by such writers as Maddison gave an explanation of the 'Golden Age' through an approach known as "growth accounting". Observing a huge increase in the ratio of investment to GDP and incorporating technical progress, Maddison argued that investment itself was the main cause of Europe's performance in productivity growth. For Maddison the implementation of new favourable policy and the increase in technology transfer led to the growth in total factor productivity. Kindleberger, in his explanation however consentrated on an unlimited supply of labour. Drawing on a growth model derived from Lewis, Kindleberger argued that an elastic labour supply skewed income distribution, favoured profits, and thereby sustained unusually high investment ratios. Lesser known is the exports approach by Lamfalussy which came to be known as the export-led growth explanation of the 'Golden Age'. ...read more.


The answer, in my opinion, would have to point to yes. However the survivors of these decades do not look back on them as a resounding success. 'Those who presided over the Golden Age did not feel at the time that they were singularly blessed and carried in a golden coach'. People are more likely to remember these decades as ones of repeated crises. There were currency uncertainties almost throughout due to balance-of-payments difficulties, and if they think to the economic experiments of the 1960s, they may look on how many were later abandoned. So if the question was asked again in terms of whether the economist using all his tools guided the economy into a 'Golden Age' of success the answer may be somewhat negative. If taken individually, each explanation of the 'Golden Age' reviewed proves to be lacking and inadequate. However taken together they provide an insight to the main factors that helped to sustain the 'Golden Age'. High investment rates were critical to the transfer of technology; exports provided rapidly expanding markets; the abundant labour supply helped the allocation of manpower to the more technologically advanced industries as well as the moderation of wages and stabilised expectations reinforced the investment drive. But why did these ingredients catalyse and produce rapid growth at this point in time, from 1950-1973? 'Economists possess their full share of the common ability to invent and commit errors.... Perhaps their most common error is to believe other economists.' G. J. Stigler ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Development Theories - Describe the Harrod-Domar model of growth

    This might generate a surplus which could them be sold generating income. Those people that moved away from the villages to the towns would earn increased incomes and this crucially according to Lewis generates more savings. The lack of development was due to a lack of savings and investment.

  2. Supply side policies and its economic impact.

    In 1981 the Reagan administration presented an optimistic scenario for growth with low inflation that was supposedly justified by supply-side considerations. Tax rates were to be cut significantly but, it was claimed, the rapid increase in growth would keep the budget close to balance.

  1. An Empirical Investigation into the Causes and Effects of Liquidity in Emerging

    particularly EME debt, thus, it will be interesting to see if it also affects US corporate debt liquidity. Higher inflation erodes the return of bonds. Both EME and US high-yield bonds are dollar denominated, therefore the US Consumer Price Index (CPI)

  2. What were the main characteristics of Early Modern Europe?

    Borders and frontiers became more clearly clarified, which consequently led to the development of a clearer identity for states. European princes chose to fight more intensively, and in a more organised fashion than before, which led to increasingly expensive wars, (often wars of attrition), causing bureaucracies to grow and tax officials to multiply.

  1. Causes of the Great Depression

    In 1924 alone, hotels such as the Mayflower (Washington D.C.), the Parker House (Boston), The Palmer House (Chicago), and the Peabody (Memphis) opened their doors. Lastly, and possibly most importantly, the construction industry benefited tremendously from the automobile. With the growing number of cars, there was a big demand for paved roads.

  2. China or India? Many companies ask themselves this question. Due to saturated markets, increasing ...

    'it limits the internet access for government and university employees' (Hill, 2005, 69) and there 'is no access to foreign newspapers' (Country Profile, BBC). Other media is controlled, as well. The question is how a wider opening of its market and further economic development will be linked to sufficient political

  1. Was the period 1918-39 a period of economic failure for Britain?

    British exports fell from 3800 sq. m to 2000 sq. m. In the years between 1910 and 1920 British cotton production fell by 25%, between 1920 and 1930 by 50%.

  2. Scarcity and Unlimited Wants.

    However, in a pin factory where each worker performs only one task, ten workers using the division of labour principle, could produce a daily total of 48 000 pins. Output per person (productivity) rose from 10 to 4800 when the division of labour principle was used.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work