• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Briefly explain the economic arguments, which have supported the continued privatisation of the transport sector in the UK since 1979

Extracts from this document...

Introduction

Briefly explain the economic arguments, which have supported the continued privatisation of the transport sector in the UK since 1979. Privatisation refers to a transfer of ownership from the public to private sector. The structural and operational changes in transport since 1979, were initially carried out by a government which has inherited many transport problems and which was determined to pursue certain economic policies. These were based on a deliberate commitment to reduce government involvement in the economy, the public sector services providing 'value for money', and a need to cut back on public expenditure. The first argument is that privatisation will expose the different industries within transport, to market forces, from which will flow the benefits of greater efficiency, faster growth and greater responsiveness to the needs of the consumer. ...read more.

Middle

In doing so it will be competing with other firms for funds, and thus must be seen capable of using the funds profitably. Lastly it will have accountability to shareholders. Shareholders will want a good return on their shares and thus will put pressure on the company to perform well. The market has corporate control and thus provides incentives for private firms to be efficient. In nationalised industries managers may frequently be required to adjust their targets for political reasons. At one time they may keep prices low as part of a government drive against inflation. Privatisation frees the company from these constraints and allows it to make more rational economic decisions and plan future investments with greater certainty. ...read more.

Conclusion

Cuts in taxation are not only popular politically, but also are seen as a means of increasing incentives to work invest and therefore stimulate increased output in the economy. Finally there is the argument of increased share ownership. This is a largely political and ideological argument. The Conservative party believes that the 'true' public ownership is not state ownership. Although in theory everyone in the UK owned the nationalised industries, people did not feel a sense of ownership or participation. Instead the industries were run by 'bureaucrats'. This was not so after privatisation, shares are now owned by members of the public who feel a much greater sense of involvement. In this sense the Conservatives argued that privatisation is really a return of the industries to the public and a form of 'popular capitalism'. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Economy & Economics section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Economy & Economics essays

  1. Free essay

    From an economic perspective should my council do more to recycle a greater proportion ...

    The regular recycling rate from present is estimated at about 50%, which is similar to Epsom and Ewell's latest and protracted rates. Although this is close to the maximum recycling rate of my household, it is expected to occur, as the household members did not find themselves stressed in any

  2. Major Economic Organizational Issues

    the wealthiest economies of the world with a constant growth of economy with only very few major knock backs. More private sector initiatives were taken up during 1980s and 1990s. Liberalization gave way for a new start reducing the burden of the public sector and globalization helped MNCs to function in India.

  1. Industry sector: coffee exporting

    Hence, governmental or legislative changes its new government may introduce can affect both internal and external market and influence the balance of trade between the two countries. There is a possibility that in case Ukraine accepts some unfavorable for the US decision, American companies will simply reduce investing in Ukrainian economy.

  2. What are the Academic arguments for and against public body regulation

    > I feel that public body regulation needs to be in place to protect medium sized banks. The big banks know themselves that the government is not going to leave them go bankrupt if they fall into trouble (AIB in 1990) and the smaller banks themselves know this as well.

  1. Discuss the assertion that the concentration of economic power in the public sector undermines ...

    the country with the lack of proper regulations, and hence the effect of the investments on economic growth is mitigated. The economic growth cannot solely depend on foreign direct investments due to this reason. The concentration of economic power in the public sector also undermines the foundations of economic growth by affecting the labour as a resource.

  2. Retailing In India - A Government Policy Perspective

    Non-food: On the non-food side, large segments of domestic apparel and shoe manufacturing are reserved for small-scale manufacturers. Consequently, product sourcing becomes difficult for retailers of branded goods and own store labels, who have to deal with issues such as poor quality, low volumes and higher costs.

  1. Is residential property in the UK a good investment?

    What I mean by good return is that it will generate more money than you originally started off with - increasing by a significant margin. What this margin may be is something that I will be investigating in my studies.

  2. Bus Transport.

    Following the deregulation of the bus market a number of changes have occurred since the mid 1980's to mid 1990's. Buses have become nearly 50 % more efficient with a 42% drop in cast of running and operating per mile.

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work