• Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

Case Facts / Summary - Mr. Ingram and Mr Christmas were partners in a firm called ` Merry`s `.

Extracts from this document...


Case Facts / Summary Mr. Ingram and Mr Christmas were partners in a firm called ` Merry`s `. Ingram retired in 1947, effectively dissolving the partnership. Christmas promised to give notice of this to those dealing with firm. No advert placed in London Gazette but new notepaper printed omitting retired partner's name. In 1948, Merry`s ordered goods from Tower Cabinet using a piece of `old` notepaper with Ingram's ( retired partner ) name on it. Christmas signed it ` Manager `. Tower Cabinet had never dealt with Merry`s before. The price was never paid so Tower Cabinets obtained judgement against Merry`s. In accordance with the laws of Agency at that time * Merry`s could choose one ( but only one ) of the partners ( agents ) to pursue. They sought to enforce it against Ingram saying that he ( Ingram ) was liable under Partnership Act 1890 and most specifically under following sections of the Act ; section 14 ( 1 )( i.e. "holding out" ) section 36 ss 1(i.e. treated as an "apparent" member / partner of firm) ...read more.


" As this was Tower Cabinet's first transaction with Ingram, which had occurred over eight months after his retirement, it could not be argued that the third party had any previous knowledge or information that Ingram had been a partner of the firm. Apparent in section 36(3) meant " appeared to be members to persons dealing with the firm " Therefore " apparent" could not apply to members who were not known to the person ( third party ) concerned to be a partner of the firm. This latter principal was applied in this case as Ingram was not known by Merry`s prior to his retirement and there was no holding out. The case of Graham v Hope ( 1792 ) Peake 208 set out that, in the case of persons dealing with the firm to whom the retiring partner was not known as a partner, no notice is necessary. However if Tower Cabinet had dealt with Mr Ingram previously as a partner of Merry`s and had not received adequate notice of his retrial they could have sought to rely upon the fact that they had acted in good faith therein binding the partnership. ...read more.


Another affect of this case applies to retired partners who die in that there are obvious implications for the estate of the deceased in that definition of "apparent" would dictate if the estate could be held liable or not. The principals and judgement expounded in the case of Tower Cabinets Ltd v Ingram [1949]2 KB 397 remains central to present day partnership law and it has served to clarify and strengthen the Partnership Act 1890. Bobliography / Points of reference Nocole Busby, Bryan Clark, Richard Mays, Roderick Paisley and Paul Spink. ( 2000 ), Scots Law, A Students Guide Ann Holmes and David Kelly, ( 1997 ), Business Law, second edition Professor Ivamy, ( 1981 ) , Underhill`s Principles of the Law of Partnership. Nicole Busby ( 2001 ), Business Law II, The Law of business organisations, 43L2 & 4L92, Course Manual, Spring Sumester 2002. Internet Resources www.westlaw.com Tower Cabinet Co. Ltd v Ingram ( 1949 ) 2 KB 397 ; [ 1949 ] 1 All ER 1033 1 43L2, Asignment #1, Submission date; 26th April 2002. ...read more.

The above preview is unformatted text

This student written piece of work is one of many that can be found in our GCSE Business, Companies and Organisation, Activity section.

Found what you're looking for?

  • Start learning 29% faster today
  • 150,000+ documents available
  • Just £6.99 a month

Not the one? Search for your essay title...
  • Join over 1.2 million students every month
  • Accelerate your learning by 29%
  • Unlimited access from just £6.99 per month

See related essaysSee related essays

Related GCSE Business, Companies and Organisation, Activity essays

  1. Human Resources Management

    Responsibilities: In all businesses, people are a vital resource - and they need to be managed as such. Ford Motor Company looks its way of recruiting in three main stages: 1. Identifying and defining the requirements. This involves the preparation of job descriptions, job specifications and person specifications 2.

  2. Business Studies

    acknowledge that it CAN occur Radical > Believe conflict in a business is evitable- competing interests of stakeholders * Types of industrial action; Is industrial action allowed: > Under the Workplaces Relations Act industrial action that takes place within the bargaining period is accepted > Methods of action must not

  1. Ann Hopkins Case Analysis

    of the evaluation categories, and comparative rankings of the class candidates (15). Candidacy and review for partnership began when the partners in a local office proposed a candidate to the admissions committee. The committee then invited every partner in the firm to submit written comments on each candidate.

  2. Legally the brothers could now be a partnership emphasised by Jessel MR in Pooley ...

    of Bill and Stan that is carrying on in the usual business way of the kind carried on by the partnership, binds the firm and its partners. Any agreements between the partners inter se, for example on roles within the firm or profit sharing ratios, aren't binding on third parties who are oblivious to them.

  1. company law problem

    Bibliography Keenan, D & Bisacre, J. Company law, 13th Pearson Longman 2005 Morse, G. Partnership Law, 6th Oxford University Press 2006 Other sources of information www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/detail?r.s=sl&type=RESOURCES&itemId=1074433319 www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/layer?r.s=sl&topicId=1073865730 www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdtog/action/layer?r.s=sl&topicId=1074429027 www.lawcom.gov.uk/Ic_reports.htm 1 http://www.businesslink.gov.uk/bdotg/action/layer?r.s=sl&topicId=1073865730 2 Partnership Act 1890 Elizabeth II HMSO section 1(1)

  2. Functional Areas

    people checking the companies' burgers on quality Quality Assurance The maintenance of quality in every process and system within McDonalds It is important to appreciate that quality is not only desirable in the finished product it should be applicable in every process and system within the business.

  1. Importance of Human Resources Management

    On whatever basis of work they deal with three types of discrimination: - Direct Discrimination - If an employer treats a black worker differently from how they would treat a white worker in the same circumstances. - Indirect Discrimination - Takes place where the employer treats all workers the same

  2. English for business

    others motivate themselves and think � be approachable, so they encouraged to admit mistakes and not cover them up � be careful of rewarding over achievement � check that they are progressing in the right direction; stop them focusing on quality at the expense of getting the job done �

  • Over 160,000 pieces
    of student written work
  • Annotated by
    experienced teachers
  • Ideas and feedback to
    improve your own work